Cargando…

Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption

Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a widely used material in prosthetics and is used to fabricate denture bases. The main disadvantage of this material is its polymerization shrinkage which causes clinical problems during use. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the microhardness, surf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moslehifard, Elnaz, Ghaffari, Tahereh, Abolghasemi, Hamidreza, Maleki Dizaj, Solmaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7069507
_version_ 1784773157739036672
author Moslehifard, Elnaz
Ghaffari, Tahereh
Abolghasemi, Hamidreza
Maleki Dizaj, Solmaz
author_facet Moslehifard, Elnaz
Ghaffari, Tahereh
Abolghasemi, Hamidreza
Maleki Dizaj, Solmaz
author_sort Moslehifard, Elnaz
collection PubMed
description Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a widely used material in prosthetics and is used to fabricate denture bases. The main disadvantage of this material is its polymerization shrinkage which causes clinical problems during use. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the microhardness, surface roughness, and water sorption of a commercial acrylic resin denture, which were processed by two different methods including conventional and pressure-packed injection molding techniques. A total of 60 polymethyl methacrylate samples were prepared in two groups: conventional acrylic resin (vertex) for the compression molding method and injection acrylic resin (vertex) for the injection molding method (10 samples of each material per test). The microhardness test was performed using a Vickers microhardness test device, the surface roughness test was performed by using a profilometer, and the water sorption test was performed using a digital scale. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 17. The significant level was considered to be 0.05. According to the results, there was a significant difference between microhardness, surface roughness, and water sorption of the samples in the two groups. The results of the independent t-test showed that the microhardness of injection vertex acrylic resin samples was significantly higher than that of conventional pressure-packed vertex acrylic resin samples (P value<0.05). Also, the surface roughness and water sorption of injection vertex acrylic resin samples were significantly lower than those of conventional pressure-packed vertex acrylic resin samples (P value <0.05). According to the obtained results, denture fabrication by the injection molding method can improve the quality and durability of dentures due to the increased microhardness, the decreased surface roughness, and the decreased water absorption of the denture base compared with the conventional method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9402357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94023572022-08-25 Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption Moslehifard, Elnaz Ghaffari, Tahereh Abolghasemi, Hamidreza Maleki Dizaj, Solmaz Int J Dent Research Article Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a widely used material in prosthetics and is used to fabricate denture bases. The main disadvantage of this material is its polymerization shrinkage which causes clinical problems during use. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the microhardness, surface roughness, and water sorption of a commercial acrylic resin denture, which were processed by two different methods including conventional and pressure-packed injection molding techniques. A total of 60 polymethyl methacrylate samples were prepared in two groups: conventional acrylic resin (vertex) for the compression molding method and injection acrylic resin (vertex) for the injection molding method (10 samples of each material per test). The microhardness test was performed using a Vickers microhardness test device, the surface roughness test was performed by using a profilometer, and the water sorption test was performed using a digital scale. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 17. The significant level was considered to be 0.05. According to the results, there was a significant difference between microhardness, surface roughness, and water sorption of the samples in the two groups. The results of the independent t-test showed that the microhardness of injection vertex acrylic resin samples was significantly higher than that of conventional pressure-packed vertex acrylic resin samples (P value<0.05). Also, the surface roughness and water sorption of injection vertex acrylic resin samples were significantly lower than those of conventional pressure-packed vertex acrylic resin samples (P value <0.05). According to the obtained results, denture fabrication by the injection molding method can improve the quality and durability of dentures due to the increased microhardness, the decreased surface roughness, and the decreased water absorption of the denture base compared with the conventional method. Hindawi 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9402357/ /pubmed/36034479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7069507 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elnaz Moslehifard et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moslehifard, Elnaz
Ghaffari, Tahereh
Abolghasemi, Hamidreza
Maleki Dizaj, Solmaz
Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption
title Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption
title_full Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption
title_fullStr Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption
title_short Comparison of Conventional Pressure-packed and Injection Molding Processing Methods for an Acrylic Resin Denture based on Microhardness, Surface Roughness, and Water Sorption
title_sort comparison of conventional pressure-packed and injection molding processing methods for an acrylic resin denture based on microhardness, surface roughness, and water sorption
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7069507
work_keys_str_mv AT moslehifardelnaz comparisonofconventionalpressurepackedandinjectionmoldingprocessingmethodsforanacrylicresindenturebasedonmicrohardnesssurfaceroughnessandwatersorption
AT ghaffaritahereh comparisonofconventionalpressurepackedandinjectionmoldingprocessingmethodsforanacrylicresindenturebasedonmicrohardnesssurfaceroughnessandwatersorption
AT abolghasemihamidreza comparisonofconventionalpressurepackedandinjectionmoldingprocessingmethodsforanacrylicresindenturebasedonmicrohardnesssurfaceroughnessandwatersorption
AT malekidizajsolmaz comparisonofconventionalpressurepackedandinjectionmoldingprocessingmethodsforanacrylicresindenturebasedonmicrohardnesssurfaceroughnessandwatersorption