Cargando…

Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization

PURPOSE: To evaluate the completeness of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reporting using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Patient-Reported Outcome (CONSORT-PRO) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving rotator cuff injuries. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brock, Lydia, Hightower, Brooke, Moore, Ty, Nees, Danya, Heigle, Benjamin, Shepard, Samuel, Kee, Micah, Ottwell, Ryan, Hartwell, Micah, Vassar, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.032
_version_ 1784773184670662656
author Brock, Lydia
Hightower, Brooke
Moore, Ty
Nees, Danya
Heigle, Benjamin
Shepard, Samuel
Kee, Micah
Ottwell, Ryan
Hartwell, Micah
Vassar, Matt
author_facet Brock, Lydia
Hightower, Brooke
Moore, Ty
Nees, Danya
Heigle, Benjamin
Shepard, Samuel
Kee, Micah
Ottwell, Ryan
Hartwell, Micah
Vassar, Matt
author_sort Brock, Lydia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the completeness of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reporting using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Patient-Reported Outcome (CONSORT-PRO) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving rotator cuff injuries. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for published RCTs focused on rotator cuff injuries that included at least one PRO measure. We included RCTs published from 2006 to 2020. Investigators extracted data from RCTs using the CONSORT-PRO and evaluated each RCT using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Our primary objective was to evaluate the mean completion percentage of CONSORT-PRO. Our secondary objective used bivariate regression analyses to explore the relationship between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting. RESULTS: The initial search returned 467 results, with 33 published RCTs meeting the prespecified inclusion criteria. The mean CONSORT-PRO completeness across all included RCTs was 49.7% (standard deviation 15.43). An increase in sample size was associated with an increase in mean completeness of reporting (t = 2.31; P = .028). The Risk of Bias assessment found 29 (of 33, 87.88%) RCTs had “some concerns” for bias. We did not find any additional significant associations between completeness of reporting and trial characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized controlled trials involving rotator cuff injuries frequently use PRO measures as primary outcomes. Reporting of these PRO measures is suboptimal and may benefit from rigorous standardization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PRO measures are increasingly incorporated as primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs. Appropriate reporting and use of state-of-the-art PRO measures may improve the dissemination of clinical knowledge from RCTs to guide treatment and determine intervention effectiveness. With increased adoption of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System and adherence to CONSORT-PRO, orthopaedic literature may improve PRO reporting to optimize the interpretability of PROs and facilitate patient-centered care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9402470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94024702022-08-26 Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization Brock, Lydia Hightower, Brooke Moore, Ty Nees, Danya Heigle, Benjamin Shepard, Samuel Kee, Micah Ottwell, Ryan Hartwell, Micah Vassar, Matt Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the completeness of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reporting using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Patient-Reported Outcome (CONSORT-PRO) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving rotator cuff injuries. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for published RCTs focused on rotator cuff injuries that included at least one PRO measure. We included RCTs published from 2006 to 2020. Investigators extracted data from RCTs using the CONSORT-PRO and evaluated each RCT using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Our primary objective was to evaluate the mean completion percentage of CONSORT-PRO. Our secondary objective used bivariate regression analyses to explore the relationship between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting. RESULTS: The initial search returned 467 results, with 33 published RCTs meeting the prespecified inclusion criteria. The mean CONSORT-PRO completeness across all included RCTs was 49.7% (standard deviation 15.43). An increase in sample size was associated with an increase in mean completeness of reporting (t = 2.31; P = .028). The Risk of Bias assessment found 29 (of 33, 87.88%) RCTs had “some concerns” for bias. We did not find any additional significant associations between completeness of reporting and trial characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Randomized controlled trials involving rotator cuff injuries frequently use PRO measures as primary outcomes. Reporting of these PRO measures is suboptimal and may benefit from rigorous standardization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PRO measures are increasingly incorporated as primary or secondary outcomes of RCTs. Appropriate reporting and use of state-of-the-art PRO measures may improve the dissemination of clinical knowledge from RCTs to guide treatment and determine intervention effectiveness. With increased adoption of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System and adherence to CONSORT-PRO, orthopaedic literature may improve PRO reporting to optimize the interpretability of PROs and facilitate patient-centered care. Elsevier 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9402470/ /pubmed/36033194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.032 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Brock, Lydia
Hightower, Brooke
Moore, Ty
Nees, Danya
Heigle, Benjamin
Shepard, Samuel
Kee, Micah
Ottwell, Ryan
Hartwell, Micah
Vassar, Matt
Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization
title Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization
title_full Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization
title_fullStr Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization
title_full_unstemmed Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization
title_short Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials on Shoulder Rotator Cuff Injuries Is Suboptimal and Requires Standardization
title_sort reporting of patient-reported outcome measures in randomized controlled trials on shoulder rotator cuff injuries is suboptimal and requires standardization
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.032
work_keys_str_mv AT brocklydia reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT hightowerbrooke reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT moorety reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT neesdanya reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT heiglebenjamin reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT shepardsamuel reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT keemicah reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT ottwellryan reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT hartwellmicah reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization
AT vassarmatt reportingofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresinrandomizedcontrolledtrialsonshoulderrotatorcuffinjuriesissuboptimalandrequiresstandardization