Cargando…

Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications

PURPOSE: To obtain a quantifiable measure of the frequency with which a shoulder instability article is discussed online and the association with its corresponding bibliometric impact, based on the Scopus Cite Score (SCS) or Web of Science Impact Factor (WSIF). METHODS: The top 100 most-mentioned ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdullah, Youssef, Mathew, Abraham J., Alokozai, Aaron, Stamm, Michaela A., Mulcahey, Mary K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.023
_version_ 1784773184908689408
author Abdullah, Youssef
Mathew, Abraham J.
Alokozai, Aaron
Stamm, Michaela A.
Mulcahey, Mary K.
author_facet Abdullah, Youssef
Mathew, Abraham J.
Alokozai, Aaron
Stamm, Michaela A.
Mulcahey, Mary K.
author_sort Abdullah, Youssef
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To obtain a quantifiable measure of the frequency with which a shoulder instability article is discussed online and the association with its corresponding bibliometric impact, based on the Scopus Cite Score (SCS) or Web of Science Impact Factor (WSIF). METHODS: The top 100 most-mentioned articles on shoulder instability based on Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) were extracted from the Altmetric Database. Mentions within blogs, news articles and outlets, public policy, and social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, were included. Study impact was assessed using SCS or WSIF. The degree of association between AAS and impact was determined using Spearman correlation, logarithmic regression, and multivariate regression. RESULTS: The most common study designs were “Clinical Trial,” with 52 articles (49.5%), “Systematic Review” with 16 articles (15.2%), and “Review” with 10 articles (9.5%). Twitter provided more online mentions than other platforms, with the average article being discussed 27.7 times (range 0-220 times). A significant positive effect (estimate = 2.616, P = .0075) was observed between the AAS and WSIF, based on the logarithmic regression. Multivariate regression revealed that blogs help raise both WSIF and SCS (estimate = 7.272, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Social media and other online platforms are a strong way to disseminate information to patients. A positive association was observed between overall online attention and the bibliometric impact of an article related to shoulder instability. Clinical trials related to shoulder instability that receive online mentions, especially discussion in blogs, are more likely to be cited in the future than their counterparts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of our study can guide authors as they aim to disseminate their articles. Twitter may be used as a tool to reach patients who may not venture into academic journals with current peer-reviewed articles. Further, blogs may be used to reach academic audiences and raise bibliometric impact broadly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9402471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94024712022-08-26 Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications Abdullah, Youssef Mathew, Abraham J. Alokozai, Aaron Stamm, Michaela A. Mulcahey, Mary K. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Systematic Review PURPOSE: To obtain a quantifiable measure of the frequency with which a shoulder instability article is discussed online and the association with its corresponding bibliometric impact, based on the Scopus Cite Score (SCS) or Web of Science Impact Factor (WSIF). METHODS: The top 100 most-mentioned articles on shoulder instability based on Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) were extracted from the Altmetric Database. Mentions within blogs, news articles and outlets, public policy, and social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, were included. Study impact was assessed using SCS or WSIF. The degree of association between AAS and impact was determined using Spearman correlation, logarithmic regression, and multivariate regression. RESULTS: The most common study designs were “Clinical Trial,” with 52 articles (49.5%), “Systematic Review” with 16 articles (15.2%), and “Review” with 10 articles (9.5%). Twitter provided more online mentions than other platforms, with the average article being discussed 27.7 times (range 0-220 times). A significant positive effect (estimate = 2.616, P = .0075) was observed between the AAS and WSIF, based on the logarithmic regression. Multivariate regression revealed that blogs help raise both WSIF and SCS (estimate = 7.272, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Social media and other online platforms are a strong way to disseminate information to patients. A positive association was observed between overall online attention and the bibliometric impact of an article related to shoulder instability. Clinical trials related to shoulder instability that receive online mentions, especially discussion in blogs, are more likely to be cited in the future than their counterparts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of our study can guide authors as they aim to disseminate their articles. Twitter may be used as a tool to reach patients who may not venture into academic journals with current peer-reviewed articles. Further, blogs may be used to reach academic audiences and raise bibliometric impact broadly. Elsevier 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9402471/ /pubmed/36033192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.023 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Abdullah, Youssef
Mathew, Abraham J.
Alokozai, Aaron
Stamm, Michaela A.
Mulcahey, Mary K.
Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications
title Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications
title_full Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications
title_fullStr Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications
title_full_unstemmed Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications
title_short Positive Association Between Online Attention and the Bibliometric Impact of Shoulder Instability Publications
title_sort positive association between online attention and the bibliometric impact of shoulder instability publications
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2022.04.023
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahyoussef positiveassociationbetweenonlineattentionandthebibliometricimpactofshoulderinstabilitypublications
AT mathewabrahamj positiveassociationbetweenonlineattentionandthebibliometricimpactofshoulderinstabilitypublications
AT alokozaiaaron positiveassociationbetweenonlineattentionandthebibliometricimpactofshoulderinstabilitypublications
AT stammmichaelaa positiveassociationbetweenonlineattentionandthebibliometricimpactofshoulderinstabilitypublications
AT mulcaheymaryk positiveassociationbetweenonlineattentionandthebibliometricimpactofshoulderinstabilitypublications