Cargando…
The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of rectal carcinoma is surgical resection according to the total mesorectal excision principle, either by open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal technique. No clear consensus exists regarding the length of the learning curve for the minimal invasive techni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35697853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z |
_version_ | 1784773190465093632 |
---|---|
author | Burghgraef, Thijs A. Sikkenk, Daan J. Verheijen, Paul M. Moumni, Mostafa El Hompes, Roel Consten, Esther C. J. |
author_facet | Burghgraef, Thijs A. Sikkenk, Daan J. Verheijen, Paul M. Moumni, Mostafa El Hompes, Roel Consten, Esther C. J. |
author_sort | Burghgraef, Thijs A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of rectal carcinoma is surgical resection according to the total mesorectal excision principle, either by open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal technique. No clear consensus exists regarding the length of the learning curve for the minimal invasive techniques. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current literature regarding the learning curve of minimal invasive TME. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies with the primary or secondary aim to assess the learning curve of either laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal TME for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was length of the learning curve per minimal invasive technique. Descriptive statistics were used to present results and the MINORS tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: 45 studies, with 7562 patients, were included in this systematic review. Length of the learning curve based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, pathological outcomes, or a composite endpoint using a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis was 50 procedures for the laparoscopic technique, 32–75 procedures for the robot-assisted technique and 36–54 procedures for the transanal technique. Due to the low quality of studies and a high level of heterogeneity a meta-analysis could not be performed. Heterogeneity was caused by patient-related factors, surgeon-related factors and differences in statistical methods. CONCLUSION: Current high-quality literature regarding length of the learning curve of minimal invasive TME techniques is scarce. Available literature suggests equal lengths of the learning curves of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal TME. Well-designed studies, using adequate statistical methods are required to properly assess the learning curve, while taking into account patient-related and surgeon-related factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9402498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94024982022-08-26 The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review Burghgraef, Thijs A. Sikkenk, Daan J. Verheijen, Paul M. Moumni, Mostafa El Hompes, Roel Consten, Esther C. J. Surg Endosc Review Article BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of rectal carcinoma is surgical resection according to the total mesorectal excision principle, either by open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal technique. No clear consensus exists regarding the length of the learning curve for the minimal invasive techniques. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current literature regarding the learning curve of minimal invasive TME. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies with the primary or secondary aim to assess the learning curve of either laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal TME for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was length of the learning curve per minimal invasive technique. Descriptive statistics were used to present results and the MINORS tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: 45 studies, with 7562 patients, were included in this systematic review. Length of the learning curve based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, pathological outcomes, or a composite endpoint using a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis was 50 procedures for the laparoscopic technique, 32–75 procedures for the robot-assisted technique and 36–54 procedures for the transanal technique. Due to the low quality of studies and a high level of heterogeneity a meta-analysis could not be performed. Heterogeneity was caused by patient-related factors, surgeon-related factors and differences in statistical methods. CONCLUSION: Current high-quality literature regarding length of the learning curve of minimal invasive TME techniques is scarce. Available literature suggests equal lengths of the learning curves of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal TME. Well-designed studies, using adequate statistical methods are required to properly assess the learning curve, while taking into account patient-related and surgeon-related factors. Springer US 2022-06-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9402498/ /pubmed/35697853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Burghgraef, Thijs A. Sikkenk, Daan J. Verheijen, Paul M. Moumni, Mostafa El Hompes, Roel Consten, Esther C. J. The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
title | The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
title_full | The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
title_short | The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
title_sort | learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35697853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burghgraefthijsa thelearningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT sikkenkdaanj thelearningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT verheijenpaulm thelearningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT moumnimostafael thelearningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT hompesroel thelearningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT constenesthercj thelearningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT burghgraefthijsa learningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT sikkenkdaanj learningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT verheijenpaulm learningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT moumnimostafael learningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT hompesroel learningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview AT constenesthercj learningcurveoflaparoscopicrobotassistedandtransanaltotalmesorectalexcisionsasystematicreview |