Cargando…

The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics

In this study, we recruited 50 chronic pain (neuropathic and nociceptive) and 43 pain-free controls to identify specific blood biomarkers of chronic neuropathic pain (CNP). Affymetrix microarray was carried out on a subset of samples selected 10 CNP and 10 pain-free control participants. The most si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, Barira, Stephenson, John, Young, Bethan, Manca, Maurizio, Buckley, David A., Radford, Helen, Zis, Panagiotis, Johnson, Mark I., Finn, David P., McHugh, Patrick C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12017-021-08694-8
_version_ 1784773192939732992
author Islam, Barira
Stephenson, John
Young, Bethan
Manca, Maurizio
Buckley, David A.
Radford, Helen
Zis, Panagiotis
Johnson, Mark I.
Finn, David P.
McHugh, Patrick C.
author_facet Islam, Barira
Stephenson, John
Young, Bethan
Manca, Maurizio
Buckley, David A.
Radford, Helen
Zis, Panagiotis
Johnson, Mark I.
Finn, David P.
McHugh, Patrick C.
author_sort Islam, Barira
collection PubMed
description In this study, we recruited 50 chronic pain (neuropathic and nociceptive) and 43 pain-free controls to identify specific blood biomarkers of chronic neuropathic pain (CNP). Affymetrix microarray was carried out on a subset of samples selected 10 CNP and 10 pain-free control participants. The most significant genes were cross-validated using the entire dataset by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). In comparative analysis of controls and CNP patients, WLS (P = 4.80 × 10(–7)), CHPT1 (P = 7.74 × 10(–7)) and CASP5 (P = 2.30 × 10(–5)) were highly significant, whilst FGFBP2 (P = 0.00162), STAT1 (P = 0.00223), FCRL6 (P = 0.00335), MYC (P = 0.00335), XCL2 (P = 0.0144) and GZMA (P = 0.0168) were significant in all CNP patients. A three-arm comparative analysis was also carried out with control as the reference group and CNP samples differentiated into two groups of high and low S-LANSS score using a cut-off of 12. STAT1, XCL2 and GZMA were not significant but KIR3DL2 (P = 0.00838), SH2D1B (P = 0.00295) and CXCR31 (P = 0.0136) were significant in CNP high S-LANSS group (S-LANSS score > 12), along with WLS (P = 8.40 × 10(–5)), CHPT1 (P = 7.89 × 10(–4)), CASP5 (P = 0.00393), FGFBP2 (P = 8.70 × 10(–4)) and FCRL6 (P = 0.00199), suggesting involvement of immune pathways in CNP mechanisms. None of the genes was significant in CNP samples with low (< 12) S-LANSS score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analysis showed that combination of MYC, STAT1, TLR4, CASP5 and WLS gene expression could be potentially used as a biomarker signature of CNP (AUROC − 0.852, (0.773, 0.931 95% CI)). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12017-021-08694-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9402512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94025122022-08-26 The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics Islam, Barira Stephenson, John Young, Bethan Manca, Maurizio Buckley, David A. Radford, Helen Zis, Panagiotis Johnson, Mark I. Finn, David P. McHugh, Patrick C. Neuromolecular Med Original Paper In this study, we recruited 50 chronic pain (neuropathic and nociceptive) and 43 pain-free controls to identify specific blood biomarkers of chronic neuropathic pain (CNP). Affymetrix microarray was carried out on a subset of samples selected 10 CNP and 10 pain-free control participants. The most significant genes were cross-validated using the entire dataset by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). In comparative analysis of controls and CNP patients, WLS (P = 4.80 × 10(–7)), CHPT1 (P = 7.74 × 10(–7)) and CASP5 (P = 2.30 × 10(–5)) were highly significant, whilst FGFBP2 (P = 0.00162), STAT1 (P = 0.00223), FCRL6 (P = 0.00335), MYC (P = 0.00335), XCL2 (P = 0.0144) and GZMA (P = 0.0168) were significant in all CNP patients. A three-arm comparative analysis was also carried out with control as the reference group and CNP samples differentiated into two groups of high and low S-LANSS score using a cut-off of 12. STAT1, XCL2 and GZMA were not significant but KIR3DL2 (P = 0.00838), SH2D1B (P = 0.00295) and CXCR31 (P = 0.0136) were significant in CNP high S-LANSS group (S-LANSS score > 12), along with WLS (P = 8.40 × 10(–5)), CHPT1 (P = 7.89 × 10(–4)), CASP5 (P = 0.00393), FGFBP2 (P = 8.70 × 10(–4)) and FCRL6 (P = 0.00199), suggesting involvement of immune pathways in CNP mechanisms. None of the genes was significant in CNP samples with low (< 12) S-LANSS score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analysis showed that combination of MYC, STAT1, TLR4, CASP5 and WLS gene expression could be potentially used as a biomarker signature of CNP (AUROC − 0.852, (0.773, 0.931 95% CI)). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12017-021-08694-8. Springer US 2021-11-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9402512/ /pubmed/34741226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12017-021-08694-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Islam, Barira
Stephenson, John
Young, Bethan
Manca, Maurizio
Buckley, David A.
Radford, Helen
Zis, Panagiotis
Johnson, Mark I.
Finn, David P.
McHugh, Patrick C.
The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics
title The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics
title_full The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics
title_fullStr The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics
title_full_unstemmed The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics
title_short The Identification of Blood Biomarkers of Chronic Neuropathic Pain by Comparative Transcriptomics
title_sort identification of blood biomarkers of chronic neuropathic pain by comparative transcriptomics
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9402512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12017-021-08694-8
work_keys_str_mv AT islambarira theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT stephensonjohn theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT youngbethan theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT mancamaurizio theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT buckleydavida theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT radfordhelen theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT zispanagiotis theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT johnsonmarki theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT finndavidp theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT mchughpatrickc theidentificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT islambarira identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT stephensonjohn identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT youngbethan identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT mancamaurizio identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT buckleydavida identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT radfordhelen identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT zispanagiotis identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT johnsonmarki identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT finndavidp identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics
AT mchughpatrickc identificationofbloodbiomarkersofchronicneuropathicpainbycomparativetranscriptomics