Cargando…
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
OBJECTIVE: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. MA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.963675 |
_version_ | 1784773285502779392 |
---|---|
author | Ge, Zhitong Wang, Yahong Wang, Ying Fang, Song Wang, Hongyan Li, Jianchu |
author_facet | Ge, Zhitong Wang, Yahong Wang, Ying Fang, Song Wang, Hongyan Li, Jianchu |
author_sort | Ge, Zhitong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From December 2016 to March 2021, 93 patients admitted to our hospital with inferior vena cava (IVC) occupying lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent detailed ultrasound multi-modality examinations, including conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans. The diagnostic value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (CU) in IVL was compared, and the specific IVL signs were summarized. RESULTS: Among the 93 patients with inferior vena cava mass, 67 were IVL while 26 were non-IVL. The inter-observer agreement of the two senior doctors was good, with Kappa coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.572–0.885). The area under the ROC curve of CU for IVL diagnosis was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.528–0.776), and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 61.1%, 69.2%, 63.4%, 83.7%, 40.9%, 38.8%, and 30.8%, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) for IVL diagnosis by CEUS was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.701–0.911), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 82.0%, 84.6%, 82.8%, 93.2%, 64.7%, 15.4%, and 17.9%, respectively. In CEUS mode, “sieve hole sign” and “multi-track sign” were detected in 57 lesions, and the detected rate was higher than that of CU (https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1014187 < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CEUS can better show the fine blood flow inside the IVL, which is important for IVL differential diagnosis. Moreover, CEUS can obtain more information about IVL diagnosis than CU, compensating for the shortcomings of CU in detecting more blood flow within the lesion. Thus, this technique has great significance for IVL diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9403056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94030562022-08-26 Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences Ge, Zhitong Wang, Yahong Wang, Ying Fang, Song Wang, Hongyan Li, Jianchu Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From December 2016 to March 2021, 93 patients admitted to our hospital with inferior vena cava (IVC) occupying lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent detailed ultrasound multi-modality examinations, including conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans. The diagnostic value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (CU) in IVL was compared, and the specific IVL signs were summarized. RESULTS: Among the 93 patients with inferior vena cava mass, 67 were IVL while 26 were non-IVL. The inter-observer agreement of the two senior doctors was good, with Kappa coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.572–0.885). The area under the ROC curve of CU for IVL diagnosis was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.528–0.776), and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 61.1%, 69.2%, 63.4%, 83.7%, 40.9%, 38.8%, and 30.8%, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) for IVL diagnosis by CEUS was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.701–0.911), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 82.0%, 84.6%, 82.8%, 93.2%, 64.7%, 15.4%, and 17.9%, respectively. In CEUS mode, “sieve hole sign” and “multi-track sign” were detected in 57 lesions, and the detected rate was higher than that of CU (https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1014187 < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CEUS can better show the fine blood flow inside the IVL, which is important for IVL differential diagnosis. Moreover, CEUS can obtain more information about IVL diagnosis than CU, compensating for the shortcomings of CU in detecting more blood flow within the lesion. Thus, this technique has great significance for IVL diagnosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9403056/ /pubmed/36033528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.963675 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ge, Wang, Wang, Fang, Wang and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ge, Zhitong Wang, Yahong Wang, Ying Fang, Song Wang, Hongyan Li, Jianchu Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
title | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
title_full | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
title_short | Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
title_sort | diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.963675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gezhitong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences AT wangyahong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences AT wangying diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences AT fangsong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences AT wanghongyan diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences AT lijianchu diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences |