Cargando…

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. MA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Zhitong, Wang, Yahong, Wang, Ying, Fang, Song, Wang, Hongyan, Li, Jianchu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.963675
_version_ 1784773285502779392
author Ge, Zhitong
Wang, Yahong
Wang, Ying
Fang, Song
Wang, Hongyan
Li, Jianchu
author_facet Ge, Zhitong
Wang, Yahong
Wang, Ying
Fang, Song
Wang, Hongyan
Li, Jianchu
author_sort Ge, Zhitong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From December 2016 to March 2021, 93 patients admitted to our hospital with inferior vena cava (IVC) occupying lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent detailed ultrasound multi-modality examinations, including conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans. The diagnostic value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (CU) in IVL was compared, and the specific IVL signs were summarized. RESULTS: Among the 93 patients with inferior vena cava mass, 67 were IVL while 26 were non-IVL. The inter-observer agreement of the two senior doctors was good, with Kappa coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.572–0.885). The area under the ROC curve of CU for IVL diagnosis was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.528–0.776), and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 61.1%, 69.2%, 63.4%, 83.7%, 40.9%, 38.8%, and 30.8%, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) for IVL diagnosis by CEUS was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.701–0.911), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 82.0%, 84.6%, 82.8%, 93.2%, 64.7%, 15.4%, and 17.9%, respectively. In CEUS mode, “sieve hole sign” and “multi-track sign” were detected in 57 lesions, and the detected rate was higher than that of CU (https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1014187 < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CEUS can better show the fine blood flow inside the IVL, which is important for IVL differential diagnosis. Moreover, CEUS can obtain more information about IVL diagnosis than CU, compensating for the shortcomings of CU in detecting more blood flow within the lesion. Thus, this technique has great significance for IVL diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9403056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94030562022-08-26 Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences Ge, Zhitong Wang, Yahong Wang, Ying Fang, Song Wang, Hongyan Li, Jianchu Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a rare disease, and few studies have focused on the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in this condition. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS in IVL and summarize the specific CEUS characteristics of IVL. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From December 2016 to March 2021, 93 patients admitted to our hospital with inferior vena cava (IVC) occupying lesions were prospectively enrolled and underwent detailed ultrasound multi-modality examinations, including conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans. The diagnostic value of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (CU) in IVL was compared, and the specific IVL signs were summarized. RESULTS: Among the 93 patients with inferior vena cava mass, 67 were IVL while 26 were non-IVL. The inter-observer agreement of the two senior doctors was good, with Kappa coefficient = 0.71 (95% CI: 0.572–0.885). The area under the ROC curve of CU for IVL diagnosis was 0.652 (95% CI: 0.528–0.776), and its sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 61.1%, 69.2%, 63.4%, 83.7%, 40.9%, 38.8%, and 30.8%, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) for IVL diagnosis by CEUS was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.701–0.911), and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 82.0%, 84.6%, 82.8%, 93.2%, 64.7%, 15.4%, and 17.9%, respectively. In CEUS mode, “sieve hole sign” and “multi-track sign” were detected in 57 lesions, and the detected rate was higher than that of CU (https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1014187 < 0.01). CONCLUSION: CEUS can better show the fine blood flow inside the IVL, which is important for IVL differential diagnosis. Moreover, CEUS can obtain more information about IVL diagnosis than CU, compensating for the shortcomings of CU in detecting more blood flow within the lesion. Thus, this technique has great significance for IVL diagnosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9403056/ /pubmed/36033528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.963675 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ge, Wang, Wang, Fang, Wang and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ge, Zhitong
Wang, Yahong
Wang, Ying
Fang, Song
Wang, Hongyan
Li, Jianchu
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
title Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
title_full Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
title_short Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
title_sort diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in intravenous leiomyomatosis: a single-center experiences
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.963675
work_keys_str_mv AT gezhitong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences
AT wangyahong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences
AT wangying diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences
AT fangsong diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences
AT wanghongyan diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences
AT lijianchu diagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundinintravenousleiomyomatosisasinglecenterexperiences