Cargando…

Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)

BACKGROUND: Healthcare is facing a growing threat of cyberattacks. Myriad data sources illustrate the same trends that healthcare is one of the industries with the highest risk of cyber infiltration and is seeing a surge in security incidents within just a few years. The circumstances thus begged th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wasserman, Liat, Wasserman, Yair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221
_version_ 1784773285971492864
author Wasserman, Liat
Wasserman, Yair
author_facet Wasserman, Liat
Wasserman, Yair
author_sort Wasserman, Liat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare is facing a growing threat of cyberattacks. Myriad data sources illustrate the same trends that healthcare is one of the industries with the highest risk of cyber infiltration and is seeing a surge in security incidents within just a few years. The circumstances thus begged the question: are US hospitals prepared for the risks that accompany clinical medicine in cyberspace? OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify the major topics and concerns present in today's hospital cybersecurity field, intended for non-cyber professionals working in hospital settings. METHODS: Via structured literature searches of the National Institutes of Health's PubMed and Tel Aviv University's DaTa databases, 35 journal articles were identified to form the core of the study. Databases were chosen for accessibility and academic rigor. Eighty-seven additional sources were examined to supplement the findings. RESULTS: The review revealed a basic landscape of hospital cybersecurity, including primary reasons hospitals are frequent targets, top attack methods, and consequences hospitals face following attacks. Cyber technologies common in healthcare and their risks were examined, including medical devices, telemedicine software, and electronic data. By infiltrating any of these components of clinical care, attackers can access mounds of information and manipulate, steal, ransom, or otherwise compromise the records, or can use the access to catapult themselves to deeper parts of a hospital's network. Issues that can increase healthcare cyber risks, like interoperability and constant accessibility, were also identified. Finally, strategies that hospitals tend to employ to combat these risks, including technical, financial, and regulatory, were explored and found to be weak. There exist serious vulnerabilities within hospitals' technologies that many hospitals presently fail to address. The COVID-19 pandemic was used to further illustrate this issue. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the risks, strategies, and gaps revealed that many US hospitals are unprepared for cyberattacks. Efforts are largely misdirected, with external—often governmental—efforts negligible. Policy changes, e.g., training employees in cyber protocols, adding advanced technical protections, and collaborating with several experts, are necessary. Overall, hospitals must recognize that, in cyber incidents, the real victims are the patients. They are at risk physically and digitally when medical devices or treatments are compromised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9403058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94030582022-08-26 Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional) Wasserman, Liat Wasserman, Yair Front Digit Health Digital Health BACKGROUND: Healthcare is facing a growing threat of cyberattacks. Myriad data sources illustrate the same trends that healthcare is one of the industries with the highest risk of cyber infiltration and is seeing a surge in security incidents within just a few years. The circumstances thus begged the question: are US hospitals prepared for the risks that accompany clinical medicine in cyberspace? OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify the major topics and concerns present in today's hospital cybersecurity field, intended for non-cyber professionals working in hospital settings. METHODS: Via structured literature searches of the National Institutes of Health's PubMed and Tel Aviv University's DaTa databases, 35 journal articles were identified to form the core of the study. Databases were chosen for accessibility and academic rigor. Eighty-seven additional sources were examined to supplement the findings. RESULTS: The review revealed a basic landscape of hospital cybersecurity, including primary reasons hospitals are frequent targets, top attack methods, and consequences hospitals face following attacks. Cyber technologies common in healthcare and their risks were examined, including medical devices, telemedicine software, and electronic data. By infiltrating any of these components of clinical care, attackers can access mounds of information and manipulate, steal, ransom, or otherwise compromise the records, or can use the access to catapult themselves to deeper parts of a hospital's network. Issues that can increase healthcare cyber risks, like interoperability and constant accessibility, were also identified. Finally, strategies that hospitals tend to employ to combat these risks, including technical, financial, and regulatory, were explored and found to be weak. There exist serious vulnerabilities within hospitals' technologies that many hospitals presently fail to address. The COVID-19 pandemic was used to further illustrate this issue. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the risks, strategies, and gaps revealed that many US hospitals are unprepared for cyberattacks. Efforts are largely misdirected, with external—often governmental—efforts negligible. Policy changes, e.g., training employees in cyber protocols, adding advanced technical protections, and collaborating with several experts, are necessary. Overall, hospitals must recognize that, in cyber incidents, the real victims are the patients. They are at risk physically and digitally when medical devices or treatments are compromised. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9403058/ /pubmed/36033634 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wasserman and Wasserman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Wasserman, Liat
Wasserman, Yair
Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)
title Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)
title_full Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)
title_fullStr Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)
title_full_unstemmed Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)
title_short Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional)
title_sort hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: review (for the non-cyber professional)
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033634
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221
work_keys_str_mv AT wassermanliat hospitalcybersecurityrisksandgapsreviewforthenoncyberprofessional
AT wassermanyair hospitalcybersecurityrisksandgapsreviewforthenoncyberprofessional