Cargando…

WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review

BACKGROUND: Preventive public health has been suggested as methods for reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Safety and efficacy of one such public health measure: WASH intervention for COVID-19 has not been systematically reviewed. We undertook a rapid review to assess the effect of WASH intervent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli, Sinha, Anju, Mishra, Gaurav, Quazi, Syed Ziauddin, Gaidhane, Shilpa, Saxena, Deepak, Gaidhane, Abhay M., Bhardwaj, Pankaj, Sawleshwarkar, Shailendra, Zahiruddin, Quazi Syed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.976423
_version_ 1784773349259345920
author Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli
Sinha, Anju
Mishra, Gaurav
Quazi, Syed Ziauddin
Gaidhane, Shilpa
Saxena, Deepak
Gaidhane, Abhay M.
Bhardwaj, Pankaj
Sawleshwarkar, Shailendra
Zahiruddin, Quazi Syed
author_facet Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli
Sinha, Anju
Mishra, Gaurav
Quazi, Syed Ziauddin
Gaidhane, Shilpa
Saxena, Deepak
Gaidhane, Abhay M.
Bhardwaj, Pankaj
Sawleshwarkar, Shailendra
Zahiruddin, Quazi Syed
author_sort Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preventive public health has been suggested as methods for reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Safety and efficacy of one such public health measure: WASH intervention for COVID-19 has not been systematically reviewed. We undertook a rapid review to assess the effect of WASH intervention in reducing the incidence of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We undertook screening of studies in two stages and extracted data and assessed the quality of evidence for the primary outcome using GRADE recommendations. MAIN RESULTS: We included a total of 13 studies with three studies on COVID-19 and 10 on SARS. The study found that hand washing, sterilization of hands, gargling, cleaning/shower after attending patients of COVID-19, or SARS was protective. Evidence also found that frequent washes can prevent SARS transmission among HCWs. However; one study reported that due to enhanced infection-prevention measures, front-line HCWs are more prone to hand-skin damage. The certainty of the evidence for our primary outcome as per GRADE was very low. We did not find any studies that assessed the effect of WASH on hospitalizations, and mortality due to COVID-19. Also; we did not find any study that compared WASH interventions with any other public health measures. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence of WASH interventions for COVID-19 is limited as it is largely based on indirect evidence from SARS. Findings from the included studies consistently show that WASH is important in reducing the number of cases during a pandemic. Timely implementation of WASH along with other public health interventions can be vital to ensure the desired success. Further good-quality studies providing direct evidence of the efficacy of WASH on COVID-19 are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9403322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94033222022-08-26 WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli Sinha, Anju Mishra, Gaurav Quazi, Syed Ziauddin Gaidhane, Shilpa Saxena, Deepak Gaidhane, Abhay M. Bhardwaj, Pankaj Sawleshwarkar, Shailendra Zahiruddin, Quazi Syed Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Preventive public health has been suggested as methods for reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Safety and efficacy of one such public health measure: WASH intervention for COVID-19 has not been systematically reviewed. We undertook a rapid review to assess the effect of WASH intervention in reducing the incidence of COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted searches in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We undertook screening of studies in two stages and extracted data and assessed the quality of evidence for the primary outcome using GRADE recommendations. MAIN RESULTS: We included a total of 13 studies with three studies on COVID-19 and 10 on SARS. The study found that hand washing, sterilization of hands, gargling, cleaning/shower after attending patients of COVID-19, or SARS was protective. Evidence also found that frequent washes can prevent SARS transmission among HCWs. However; one study reported that due to enhanced infection-prevention measures, front-line HCWs are more prone to hand-skin damage. The certainty of the evidence for our primary outcome as per GRADE was very low. We did not find any studies that assessed the effect of WASH on hospitalizations, and mortality due to COVID-19. Also; we did not find any study that compared WASH interventions with any other public health measures. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence of WASH interventions for COVID-19 is limited as it is largely based on indirect evidence from SARS. Findings from the included studies consistently show that WASH is important in reducing the number of cases during a pandemic. Timely implementation of WASH along with other public health interventions can be vital to ensure the desired success. Further good-quality studies providing direct evidence of the efficacy of WASH on COVID-19 are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9403322/ /pubmed/36033810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.976423 Text en Copyright © 2022 Khatib, Sinha, Mishra, Quazi, Gaidhane, Saxena, Gaidhane, Bhardwaj, Sawleshwarkar and Zahiruddin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Khatib, Mahalaqua Nazli
Sinha, Anju
Mishra, Gaurav
Quazi, Syed Ziauddin
Gaidhane, Shilpa
Saxena, Deepak
Gaidhane, Abhay M.
Bhardwaj, Pankaj
Sawleshwarkar, Shailendra
Zahiruddin, Quazi Syed
WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review
title WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review
title_full WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review
title_fullStr WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review
title_full_unstemmed WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review
title_short WASH to control COVID-19: A rapid review
title_sort wash to control covid-19: a rapid review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.976423
work_keys_str_mv AT khatibmahalaquanazli washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT sinhaanju washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT mishragaurav washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT quazisyedziauddin washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT gaidhaneshilpa washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT saxenadeepak washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT gaidhaneabhaym washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT bhardwajpankaj washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT sawleshwarkarshailendra washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview
AT zahiruddinquazisyed washtocontrolcovid19arapidreview