Cargando…

Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies

BACKGROUND: Transosseous tunnel (TO) repair is considered the gold standard for patellar tendon rupture; however, suture anchor (SA) repair has emerged as a viable alternative in recent years. Although both these techniques are used widely in clinical practice, the most biomechanically optimal const...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imbergamo, Casey, Sequeira, Sean, Bano, Joseph, Rate, William R., Gould, Heath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221120212
_version_ 1784773381994840064
author Imbergamo, Casey
Sequeira, Sean
Bano, Joseph
Rate, William R.
Gould, Heath
author_facet Imbergamo, Casey
Sequeira, Sean
Bano, Joseph
Rate, William R.
Gould, Heath
author_sort Imbergamo, Casey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transosseous tunnel (TO) repair is considered the gold standard for patellar tendon rupture; however, suture anchor (SA) repair has emerged as a viable alternative in recent years. Although both these techniques are used widely in clinical practice, the most biomechanically optimal construct for patellar tendon repair remains unknown. PURPOSE: To examine published studies on the biomechanical properties of TO and SA fixation for patellar tendon repair in terms of ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap formation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in either outcome measure between the groups. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of SA and TO techniques for repair of a ruptured patellar tendon. The search phrase implemented was “patellar tendon repair.” Meta-analysis was performed to provide a quantitative comparison of the 2 techniques with regard to ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap displacement. Weighted averages were calculated for all quantitative outcomes, and outcomes were summarized in a forest plot. A random-effects model was used to account for the heterogeneity among the included studies in the final statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 875 studies initially screened, the inclusion criteria were met by 7 studies, including 128 cadaveric specimens (66 SA, 62 TO). The pooled analysis from 6 studies reporting on gap displacement revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of SA versus TO fixation (P < .001). Pooled analysis from 7 studies reporting on ultimate load to failure did not reveal a statistically significant difference between the use of SA and TO for tendon repair (P = .465). CONCLUSION: Our systematic review revealed that the use of SA fixation for patellar tendon repair was associated with lower cyclic gap displacement when compared with TO fixation. There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the repair techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9403461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94034612022-08-26 Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies Imbergamo, Casey Sequeira, Sean Bano, Joseph Rate, William R. Gould, Heath Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Transosseous tunnel (TO) repair is considered the gold standard for patellar tendon rupture; however, suture anchor (SA) repair has emerged as a viable alternative in recent years. Although both these techniques are used widely in clinical practice, the most biomechanically optimal construct for patellar tendon repair remains unknown. PURPOSE: To examine published studies on the biomechanical properties of TO and SA fixation for patellar tendon repair in terms of ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap formation. The null hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in either outcome measure between the groups. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of SA and TO techniques for repair of a ruptured patellar tendon. The search phrase implemented was “patellar tendon repair.” Meta-analysis was performed to provide a quantitative comparison of the 2 techniques with regard to ultimate load to failure and cyclic gap displacement. Weighted averages were calculated for all quantitative outcomes, and outcomes were summarized in a forest plot. A random-effects model was used to account for the heterogeneity among the included studies in the final statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of 875 studies initially screened, the inclusion criteria were met by 7 studies, including 128 cadaveric specimens (66 SA, 62 TO). The pooled analysis from 6 studies reporting on gap displacement revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of SA versus TO fixation (P < .001). Pooled analysis from 7 studies reporting on ultimate load to failure did not reveal a statistically significant difference between the use of SA and TO for tendon repair (P = .465). CONCLUSION: Our systematic review revealed that the use of SA fixation for patellar tendon repair was associated with lower cyclic gap displacement when compared with TO fixation. There was no significant difference in ultimate load to failure between the repair techniques. SAGE Publications 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9403461/ /pubmed/36035892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221120212 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Imbergamo, Casey
Sequeira, Sean
Bano, Joseph
Rate, William R.
Gould, Heath
Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies
title Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies
title_full Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies
title_fullStr Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies
title_full_unstemmed Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies
title_short Failure Rates of Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transosseous Tunnel Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies
title_sort failure rates of suture anchor fixation versus transosseous tunnel technique for patellar tendon repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36035892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221120212
work_keys_str_mv AT imbergamocasey failureratesofsutureanchorfixationversustransosseoustunneltechniqueforpatellartendonrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalstudies
AT sequeirasean failureratesofsutureanchorfixationversustransosseoustunneltechniqueforpatellartendonrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalstudies
AT banojoseph failureratesofsutureanchorfixationversustransosseoustunneltechniqueforpatellartendonrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalstudies
AT ratewilliamr failureratesofsutureanchorfixationversustransosseoustunneltechniqueforpatellartendonrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalstudies
AT gouldheath failureratesofsutureanchorfixationversustransosseoustunneltechniqueforpatellartendonrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofbiomechanicalstudies