Cargando…

Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food

This study used a two-part questionnaire to investigate consumer knowledge and attitudes toward bacteriophage applications in pet food, pet food safety, and environmental sustainability. Part 1 included questions about pet food safety, sustainability, and knowledge and attitudes toward bacteriophage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eagan, Bailey H., Wang, Siyun, Hall, Nathaniel, Protopopova, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.921508
_version_ 1784773394392154112
author Eagan, Bailey H.
Wang, Siyun
Hall, Nathaniel
Protopopova, Alexandra
author_facet Eagan, Bailey H.
Wang, Siyun
Hall, Nathaniel
Protopopova, Alexandra
author_sort Eagan, Bailey H.
collection PubMed
description This study used a two-part questionnaire to investigate consumer knowledge and attitudes toward bacteriophage applications in pet food, pet food safety, and environmental sustainability. Part 1 included questions about pet food safety, sustainability, and knowledge and attitudes toward bacteriophages. Next, participants reviewed educational materials about each, and Part 2 assessed if this increased knowledge of, or changed attitudes toward, bacteriophage application. Participants (n = 80), were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MT) (n = 45) and Social Media (SM) (n = 35). Mean responses in Part 1 and Part 2 were compared by paired t-tests, and mean responses between MT and SM were compared by t-tests. Participants reported pet food safety was important to them (combined proportion strongly agree or agree, mean ± SD) (75/80, 94%, MT 4.66 ± 0.60, SM 4.71 ± 0.95) and were most concerned with raw pet food safety (51/80, 64%, MT 3.88 ± 0.80, SM 3.17 ± 1.40). Participants rated environmental sustainability as important (61/80, 76%, MT 3.86 ± 0.94, SM 3.97 ± 0.66); however, it was not a strong driver of pet food purchasing (26/80, 33%, MT 3.31 ± 1.25, SM 2.82 ± 0.82). Overall, data showed an increase in knowledge of bacteriophages following a review of educational material. However, in the SM group, no statistically significant difference was observed in the comfort eating food with bacteriophage additives (SM Part 1 3.37 ± 1.05, SM Part 2 3.48 ± 1.12, p = 0.279), whereas the MT group did show an increase (MT Part 1 3.57 ± 1.01, MT Part 2 4.08 ± 0.92, p < 0.001). In the SM group, no statistically significant difference was observed in comfort feeding their pet food with bacteriophage additives (SM Part 1 3.40 ± 1.03, SM Part 2 3.45 ± 1.14, p = 0.571), whereas the MT group did show an increase (MT Part 1 3.57 ± 0.98, MT Part 2 4.31 ± 0.84, p < 0.001). The strongest objections related to safety concerns (20/53, 38%, MT 2.83 ± 0.96, SM 3.27 ± 0.84). These results demonstrate that despite increasing knowledge, there is still hesitancy among some consumers toward bacteriophage applications in pet food.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9403512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94035122022-08-26 Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food Eagan, Bailey H. Wang, Siyun Hall, Nathaniel Protopopova, Alexandra Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science This study used a two-part questionnaire to investigate consumer knowledge and attitudes toward bacteriophage applications in pet food, pet food safety, and environmental sustainability. Part 1 included questions about pet food safety, sustainability, and knowledge and attitudes toward bacteriophages. Next, participants reviewed educational materials about each, and Part 2 assessed if this increased knowledge of, or changed attitudes toward, bacteriophage application. Participants (n = 80), were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MT) (n = 45) and Social Media (SM) (n = 35). Mean responses in Part 1 and Part 2 were compared by paired t-tests, and mean responses between MT and SM were compared by t-tests. Participants reported pet food safety was important to them (combined proportion strongly agree or agree, mean ± SD) (75/80, 94%, MT 4.66 ± 0.60, SM 4.71 ± 0.95) and were most concerned with raw pet food safety (51/80, 64%, MT 3.88 ± 0.80, SM 3.17 ± 1.40). Participants rated environmental sustainability as important (61/80, 76%, MT 3.86 ± 0.94, SM 3.97 ± 0.66); however, it was not a strong driver of pet food purchasing (26/80, 33%, MT 3.31 ± 1.25, SM 2.82 ± 0.82). Overall, data showed an increase in knowledge of bacteriophages following a review of educational material. However, in the SM group, no statistically significant difference was observed in the comfort eating food with bacteriophage additives (SM Part 1 3.37 ± 1.05, SM Part 2 3.48 ± 1.12, p = 0.279), whereas the MT group did show an increase (MT Part 1 3.57 ± 1.01, MT Part 2 4.08 ± 0.92, p < 0.001). In the SM group, no statistically significant difference was observed in comfort feeding their pet food with bacteriophage additives (SM Part 1 3.40 ± 1.03, SM Part 2 3.45 ± 1.14, p = 0.571), whereas the MT group did show an increase (MT Part 1 3.57 ± 0.98, MT Part 2 4.31 ± 0.84, p < 0.001). The strongest objections related to safety concerns (20/53, 38%, MT 2.83 ± 0.96, SM 3.27 ± 0.84). These results demonstrate that despite increasing knowledge, there is still hesitancy among some consumers toward bacteriophage applications in pet food. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9403512/ /pubmed/36032294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.921508 Text en Copyright © 2022 Eagan, Wang, Hall and Protopopova. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Eagan, Bailey H.
Wang, Siyun
Hall, Nathaniel
Protopopova, Alexandra
Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
title Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
title_full Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
title_fullStr Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
title_full_unstemmed Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
title_short Consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
title_sort consumer attitudes toward bacteriophage applications to pet food
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36032294
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.921508
work_keys_str_mv AT eaganbaileyh consumerattitudestowardbacteriophageapplicationstopetfood
AT wangsiyun consumerattitudestowardbacteriophageapplicationstopetfood
AT hallnathaniel consumerattitudestowardbacteriophageapplicationstopetfood
AT protopopovaalexandra consumerattitudestowardbacteriophageapplicationstopetfood