Cargando…
Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is necessary. This study arm to investigate the value of 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI),...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060584 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-189 |
_version_ | 1784773410232991744 |
---|---|
author | Meng, Nan Fu, Fangfang Sun, Jing Feng, Pengyang Luo, Yu Wu, Yaping Li, Xiaochen Yuan, Jianmin Yang, Yang Liu, Hui Wang, Zhe Wang, Meiyun |
author_facet | Meng, Nan Fu, Fangfang Sun, Jing Feng, Pengyang Luo, Yu Wu, Yaping Li, Xiaochen Yuan, Jianmin Yang, Yang Liu, Hui Wang, Zhe Wang, Meiyun |
author_sort | Meng, Nan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Noninvasive assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is necessary. This study arm to investigate the value of 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) in the assessment of PD-L1 status in NSCLC. METHODS: This is a prospective diagnostic study. A total of 76 patients with NSCLC underwent chest (18)F-FDG PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), quantitate the metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f), and magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry at 3.5 ppm [MTRasym (3.5 ppm)] from (18)F-FDG PET, DWI, IVIM, and APTWI, respectively, were compared. The optimal combination of parameters was investigated using logistic regression models and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The bootstrap with 1,000 samples was used for model validation. RESULTS: SUV(max), MTV, TLG, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) were higher and D and f were lower in PD-L1 positive NSCLC than in PD-L1 negative NSCLC (all P<0.05). Logistic analysis showed that the combination of MTRasym (3.5 ppm), D, and SUV(max) had the strongest predictive value for the differentiation of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative NSCLC [AUC, 0.946; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.869–0.985; sensitivity, 85.29%; specificity, 91.67%; P all <0.001]. The verification model showed the combination of MTRasym (3.5 ppm), D, and SUV(max) had the strongest predictive value, and its ROC curve and calibration curve showed good accuracy (AUC, 0.919, 95% CI: 0.891–0.937) and consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-parametric (18)F-FDG PET/MRI is beneficial for the non-invasive assessment of PD-L1 status in NSCLC patients, and the combination of SUV(max), D, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) may serve as a prognostic biomarker to guide immunotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9403585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94035852022-09-01 Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET Meng, Nan Fu, Fangfang Sun, Jing Feng, Pengyang Luo, Yu Wu, Yaping Li, Xiaochen Yuan, Jianmin Yang, Yang Liu, Hui Wang, Zhe Wang, Meiyun Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Noninvasive assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is necessary. This study arm to investigate the value of 2-[(18)F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) in the assessment of PD-L1 status in NSCLC. METHODS: This is a prospective diagnostic study. A total of 76 patients with NSCLC underwent chest (18)F-FDG PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)), quantitate the metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f), and magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry at 3.5 ppm [MTRasym (3.5 ppm)] from (18)F-FDG PET, DWI, IVIM, and APTWI, respectively, were compared. The optimal combination of parameters was investigated using logistic regression models and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The bootstrap with 1,000 samples was used for model validation. RESULTS: SUV(max), MTV, TLG, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) were higher and D and f were lower in PD-L1 positive NSCLC than in PD-L1 negative NSCLC (all P<0.05). Logistic analysis showed that the combination of MTRasym (3.5 ppm), D, and SUV(max) had the strongest predictive value for the differentiation of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative NSCLC [AUC, 0.946; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.869–0.985; sensitivity, 85.29%; specificity, 91.67%; P all <0.001]. The verification model showed the combination of MTRasym (3.5 ppm), D, and SUV(max) had the strongest predictive value, and its ROC curve and calibration curve showed good accuracy (AUC, 0.919, 95% CI: 0.891–0.937) and consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-parametric (18)F-FDG PET/MRI is beneficial for the non-invasive assessment of PD-L1 status in NSCLC patients, and the combination of SUV(max), D, and MTRasym (3.5 ppm) may serve as a prognostic biomarker to guide immunotherapy. AME Publishing Company 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9403585/ /pubmed/36060584 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-189 Text en 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Meng, Nan Fu, Fangfang Sun, Jing Feng, Pengyang Luo, Yu Wu, Yaping Li, Xiaochen Yuan, Jianmin Yang, Yang Liu, Hui Wang, Zhe Wang, Meiyun Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET |
title | Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET |
title_full | Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET |
title_short | Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)F-FDG PET |
title_sort | sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and (18)f-fdg pet |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060584 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengnan sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT fufangfang sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT sunjing sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT fengpengyang sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT luoyu sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT wuyaping sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT lixiaochen sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT yuanjianmin sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT yangyang sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT liuhui sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT wangzhe sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet AT wangmeiyun sensitivityandspecificityofamideprotontransferweightedimagingforassessingprogrammeddeathligand1statusinnonsmallcelllungcanceracomparativestudywithintravoxelincoherentmotionand18ffdgpet |