Cargando…
Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants
IMPORTANCE: Variants of SARS-CoV-2 have sequence variations in the viral genome that may alter the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the analytical and clinical accuracy of 2 rapid diagnostic tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 during 3 phases of variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PART...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36001317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28143 |
_version_ | 1784773455757967360 |
---|---|
author | Drain, Paul K. Bemer, Meagan Morton, Jennifer F. Dalmat, Ronit Abdille, Hussein Thomas, Katherine K. Uppal, Timsy K. Hau, Derrick Green, Heather R. Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. AuCoin, David P. Verma, Subhash C. |
author_facet | Drain, Paul K. Bemer, Meagan Morton, Jennifer F. Dalmat, Ronit Abdille, Hussein Thomas, Katherine K. Uppal, Timsy K. Hau, Derrick Green, Heather R. Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. AuCoin, David P. Verma, Subhash C. |
author_sort | Drain, Paul K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Variants of SARS-CoV-2 have sequence variations in the viral genome that may alter the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the analytical and clinical accuracy of 2 rapid diagnostic tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 during 3 phases of variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This diagnostic study included participants aged 18 years or older who reported onset of COVID-19–like symptoms within the prior 5 days and were tested at multiple COVID-19 testing locations in King County, Washington, from February 17, 2021, to January 11, 2022, during 3 distinct phases of SARS-CoV-2 infection (pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron). INTERVENTIONS: Two anterior nasal swab specimens were collected from each participant—1 for onsite testing by the SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test and 1 for reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The analytical limit of detection of the 2 rapid diagnostic tests (SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test and BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card) was assessed using Omicron (B.1.1.529/BA.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and a wild-type (USA-WA1/2020) variant. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of clinical testing for the rapid antigen tests were compared with that of RT-PCR testing. RESULTS: A total of 802 participants were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 37.3 [13.3] years; 467 [58.2%] female), 424 (52.9%) of whom had not received COVID-19 vaccination and presented a median of 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days) from symptom onset. Overall, no significant differences were found in the analytical limit of detection or clinical diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen testing across SARS-CoV-2 variants. The estimated limit of detection for both rapid nucleocapsid antigen tests was at or below a 50% tissue culture infectious dose of 62.5, and the positive percent agreement of the SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test ranged from 81.2% (95% CI, 69.5%-89.9%) to 90.7% (95% CI, 77.9%-97.4%) across the 3 phases of variants. The diagnostic sensitivity increased for nasal swabs with a lower cycle threshold by RT-PCR, which correlates with a higher viral load. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this diagnostic study, analytical and clinical performance data demonstrated accuracy of 2 rapid antigen tests among adults with COVID-19 symptoms across 3 phases of SARS-CoV-2 variants. The findings suggest that home-based rapid antigen testing programs may be an important intervention to reduce global SARS-CoV-2 transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9403778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94037782022-09-06 Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Drain, Paul K. Bemer, Meagan Morton, Jennifer F. Dalmat, Ronit Abdille, Hussein Thomas, Katherine K. Uppal, Timsy K. Hau, Derrick Green, Heather R. Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. AuCoin, David P. Verma, Subhash C. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Variants of SARS-CoV-2 have sequence variations in the viral genome that may alter the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests. OBJECTIVE: To assess the analytical and clinical accuracy of 2 rapid diagnostic tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 during 3 phases of variants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This diagnostic study included participants aged 18 years or older who reported onset of COVID-19–like symptoms within the prior 5 days and were tested at multiple COVID-19 testing locations in King County, Washington, from February 17, 2021, to January 11, 2022, during 3 distinct phases of SARS-CoV-2 infection (pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron). INTERVENTIONS: Two anterior nasal swab specimens were collected from each participant—1 for onsite testing by the SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test and 1 for reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The analytical limit of detection of the 2 rapid diagnostic tests (SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test and BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card) was assessed using Omicron (B.1.1.529/BA.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and a wild-type (USA-WA1/2020) variant. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of clinical testing for the rapid antigen tests were compared with that of RT-PCR testing. RESULTS: A total of 802 participants were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 37.3 [13.3] years; 467 [58.2%] female), 424 (52.9%) of whom had not received COVID-19 vaccination and presented a median of 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days) from symptom onset. Overall, no significant differences were found in the analytical limit of detection or clinical diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen testing across SARS-CoV-2 variants. The estimated limit of detection for both rapid nucleocapsid antigen tests was at or below a 50% tissue culture infectious dose of 62.5, and the positive percent agreement of the SCoV-2 Ag Detect Rapid Self-Test ranged from 81.2% (95% CI, 69.5%-89.9%) to 90.7% (95% CI, 77.9%-97.4%) across the 3 phases of variants. The diagnostic sensitivity increased for nasal swabs with a lower cycle threshold by RT-PCR, which correlates with a higher viral load. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this diagnostic study, analytical and clinical performance data demonstrated accuracy of 2 rapid antigen tests among adults with COVID-19 symptoms across 3 phases of SARS-CoV-2 variants. The findings suggest that home-based rapid antigen testing programs may be an important intervention to reduce global SARS-CoV-2 transmission. American Medical Association 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9403778/ /pubmed/36001317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28143 Text en Copyright 2022 Drain PK et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Drain, Paul K. Bemer, Meagan Morton, Jennifer F. Dalmat, Ronit Abdille, Hussein Thomas, Katherine K. Uppal, Timsy K. Hau, Derrick Green, Heather R. Gates-Hollingsworth, Marcellene A. AuCoin, David P. Verma, Subhash C. Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants |
title | Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants |
title_full | Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants |
title_short | Accuracy of 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During 3 Phases of SARS-CoV-2 Variants |
title_sort | accuracy of 2 rapid antigen tests during 3 phases of sars-cov-2 variants |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36001317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drainpaulk accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT bemermeagan accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT mortonjenniferf accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT dalmatronit accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT abdillehussein accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT thomaskatherinek accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT uppaltimsyk accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT hauderrick accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT greenheatherr accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT gateshollingsworthmarcellenea accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT aucoindavidp accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants AT vermasubhashc accuracyof2rapidantigentestsduring3phasesofsarscov2variants |