Cargando…

基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析

Different nectar plants contain various secondary metabolites. Herein, the differences in the contents of endogenous metabolites in honeys from eight botanical origins (i. e., acacia, jujube, vitex, linden, buckwheat, manuka, wolfberry, and motherwort honeys) were investigated by a non-targeted meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SHEN, Shi, YANG, Yi, WANG, Jingbo, CHEN, Xi, LIU, Tingting, ZHUO, Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.06029
_version_ 1784773461512552448
author SHEN, Shi
YANG, Yi
WANG, Jingbo
CHEN, Xi
LIU, Tingting
ZHUO, Qin
author_facet SHEN, Shi
YANG, Yi
WANG, Jingbo
CHEN, Xi
LIU, Tingting
ZHUO, Qin
author_sort SHEN, Shi
collection PubMed
description Different nectar plants contain various secondary metabolites. Herein, the differences in the contents of endogenous metabolites in honeys from eight botanical origins (i. e., acacia, jujube, vitex, linden, buckwheat, manuka, wolfberry, and motherwort honeys) were investigated by a non-targeted metabolomics-based method. This method involved solid-phase extraction pretreatment and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS(E)). An oasis HLB cartridge was used for the removal of many saccharides. Chromatographic experiments were performed on an HSS T3 column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) using a mobile phase that consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile and water. Mass spectrometry was conducted in the positive and negative modes by electrospray ionization (ESI). Metabolic information about the honeys from different botanical origins was acquired using a multivariate statistical analysis model. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were conducted for pattern recognition and difference analysis. PCA was performed for 10557 and 2706 data variables in the positive and negative ion modes, respectively. The distribution of honeys from different botanical origins was investigated in 88 honey samples. The three principal components exhibited 48.05% and 57.88% of the total variance in positive and negative ion modes, respectively. The samples studied were divided into six different groups on the basis of their botanical origins and metabolic compounds: linden, vitex, buckwheat, manuka, jujube, and acacia honeys. A permutation test (n=200) was conducted to verify the fit of the model. The differential metabolites were screened on the basis of variable importance in project (VIP; >1), analysis of variance (ANOVA; p<0.05), and maximum fold change (>1.5) by using the PLS-DA model. The compounds were identified based on the data retrieved from the Chemspider and HMDB databases according to the quality information of precursor ions and fragment ions. Thirty-two differential metabolites were screened and primarily identified according to the characteristic fragmentation rules of specific structure types and data retrieval, including 18 flavonoids, 7 phenolic acids, 6 phenyl and terpenoid glycosides, and 1 steroid. Various flavonoids in buckwheat and manuka honeys, such as quercetin, sakuranetin, 7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, luteolin-7-methyl ether, and pollenitin, were found. In buckwheat honey, the contents of 3-methoxy-2-(4-methylbenzoyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 2-hydroxy-3,4-diphenylpentanedioic acid, 3'-methoxydihydroformononetin, phenylpyruvic acid, 2-O-p-coumaroyltartronic acid, 2-(3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 4-[(2E)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-yl]-3-methoxyphenol, and 7-hydroxy-5-methoxyflavan were the highest; these compounds are the characteristic metabolites of buckwheat honey. In addition, manuka honey possessed the highest contents of gnaphaliin and galangin 3-methyl ether. Moreover, linden honey contained the characteristic phenyl glycosides of (S)-multifidol 2-[apiosyl-(1➝6)-glucoside], 2-phenylethyl-β-D-glucopyranoside, benzyl O-[arabinofuranosyl-(1➝6)-glucoside], crosatoside B, and terpenoid glycosides of isopentyl gentiobioside and 6-O-oleuropeoylsucrose. Vitex honey was found to be rich in quinic acid derivatives such as caffeoyl-3-O-feruloyl-quinic acid/1-feruloyl-5-caffeoylquinic acid, 3-O-caffeoyl-4-O-methyl-quinic acid/3-feruloylquinic acid, and 3-O-caffeoyl-1-O-methyl-quinic acid, in addition to the flavonoids of vitexin, namely, 6″-(3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate) and apigenin-7-[galactosyl-(1➝4)-mannoside]. Moreover, ponasteroside A was a characteristic marker of jujube honey, and the contents of 6-C-fucosylluteolin and kaempferol 3-(2″-rhamnosylrutinoside) were the highest in acacia honey. In conclusion, the method based on non-targeted metabolomics involving UPLC-Q-TOF-MS(E) for different unifloral honeys was found to be fast, effective, specific, and accurate. The differences in metabolite contents and the characteristic compounds in various unifloral honeys were preliminarily illustrated. This study provides an effective analytical strategy for honey traceability and quality analysis of unifloral honey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9403802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94038022022-09-14 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析 SHEN, Shi YANG, Yi WANG, Jingbo CHEN, Xi LIU, Tingting ZHUO, Qin Se Pu Articles Different nectar plants contain various secondary metabolites. Herein, the differences in the contents of endogenous metabolites in honeys from eight botanical origins (i. e., acacia, jujube, vitex, linden, buckwheat, manuka, wolfberry, and motherwort honeys) were investigated by a non-targeted metabolomics-based method. This method involved solid-phase extraction pretreatment and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS(E)). An oasis HLB cartridge was used for the removal of many saccharides. Chromatographic experiments were performed on an HSS T3 column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) using a mobile phase that consisted of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile and water. Mass spectrometry was conducted in the positive and negative modes by electrospray ionization (ESI). Metabolic information about the honeys from different botanical origins was acquired using a multivariate statistical analysis model. Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were conducted for pattern recognition and difference analysis. PCA was performed for 10557 and 2706 data variables in the positive and negative ion modes, respectively. The distribution of honeys from different botanical origins was investigated in 88 honey samples. The three principal components exhibited 48.05% and 57.88% of the total variance in positive and negative ion modes, respectively. The samples studied were divided into six different groups on the basis of their botanical origins and metabolic compounds: linden, vitex, buckwheat, manuka, jujube, and acacia honeys. A permutation test (n=200) was conducted to verify the fit of the model. The differential metabolites were screened on the basis of variable importance in project (VIP; >1), analysis of variance (ANOVA; p<0.05), and maximum fold change (>1.5) by using the PLS-DA model. The compounds were identified based on the data retrieved from the Chemspider and HMDB databases according to the quality information of precursor ions and fragment ions. Thirty-two differential metabolites were screened and primarily identified according to the characteristic fragmentation rules of specific structure types and data retrieval, including 18 flavonoids, 7 phenolic acids, 6 phenyl and terpenoid glycosides, and 1 steroid. Various flavonoids in buckwheat and manuka honeys, such as quercetin, sakuranetin, 7-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, luteolin-7-methyl ether, and pollenitin, were found. In buckwheat honey, the contents of 3-methoxy-2-(4-methylbenzoyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 2-hydroxy-3,4-diphenylpentanedioic acid, 3'-methoxydihydroformononetin, phenylpyruvic acid, 2-O-p-coumaroyltartronic acid, 2-(3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one, 4-[(2E)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-yl]-3-methoxyphenol, and 7-hydroxy-5-methoxyflavan were the highest; these compounds are the characteristic metabolites of buckwheat honey. In addition, manuka honey possessed the highest contents of gnaphaliin and galangin 3-methyl ether. Moreover, linden honey contained the characteristic phenyl glycosides of (S)-multifidol 2-[apiosyl-(1➝6)-glucoside], 2-phenylethyl-β-D-glucopyranoside, benzyl O-[arabinofuranosyl-(1➝6)-glucoside], crosatoside B, and terpenoid glycosides of isopentyl gentiobioside and 6-O-oleuropeoylsucrose. Vitex honey was found to be rich in quinic acid derivatives such as caffeoyl-3-O-feruloyl-quinic acid/1-feruloyl-5-caffeoylquinic acid, 3-O-caffeoyl-4-O-methyl-quinic acid/3-feruloylquinic acid, and 3-O-caffeoyl-1-O-methyl-quinic acid, in addition to the flavonoids of vitexin, namely, 6″-(3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate) and apigenin-7-[galactosyl-(1➝4)-mannoside]. Moreover, ponasteroside A was a characteristic marker of jujube honey, and the contents of 6-C-fucosylluteolin and kaempferol 3-(2″-rhamnosylrutinoside) were the highest in acacia honey. In conclusion, the method based on non-targeted metabolomics involving UPLC-Q-TOF-MS(E) for different unifloral honeys was found to be fast, effective, specific, and accurate. The differences in metabolite contents and the characteristic compounds in various unifloral honeys were preliminarily illustrated. This study provides an effective analytical strategy for honey traceability and quality analysis of unifloral honey. Editorial board of Chinese Journal of Chromatography 2021-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9403802/ /pubmed/34227310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.06029 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/本文是开放获取文章,遵循CC BY 4.0协议 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
SHEN, Shi
YANG, Yi
WANG, Jingbo
CHEN, Xi
LIU, Tingting
ZHUO, Qin
基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
title 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
title_full 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
title_fullStr 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
title_full_unstemmed 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
title_short 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
title_sort 基于超高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱的非靶向代谢组学用于不同来源单花蜜的差异分析
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.06029
work_keys_str_mv AT shenshi jīyúchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔsìjígānfēixíngshíjiānzhìpǔdefēibǎxiàngdàixièzǔxuéyòngyúbùtóngláiyuándānhuāmìdechàyìfēnxī
AT yangyi jīyúchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔsìjígānfēixíngshíjiānzhìpǔdefēibǎxiàngdàixièzǔxuéyòngyúbùtóngláiyuándānhuāmìdechàyìfēnxī
AT wangjingbo jīyúchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔsìjígānfēixíngshíjiānzhìpǔdefēibǎxiàngdàixièzǔxuéyòngyúbùtóngláiyuándānhuāmìdechàyìfēnxī
AT chenxi jīyúchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔsìjígānfēixíngshíjiānzhìpǔdefēibǎxiàngdàixièzǔxuéyòngyúbùtóngláiyuándānhuāmìdechàyìfēnxī
AT liutingting jīyúchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔsìjígānfēixíngshíjiānzhìpǔdefēibǎxiàngdàixièzǔxuéyòngyúbùtóngláiyuándānhuāmìdechàyìfēnxī
AT zhuoqin jīyúchāogāoxiàoyèxiāngsèpǔsìjígānfēixíngshíjiānzhìpǔdefēibǎxiàngdàixièzǔxuéyòngyúbùtóngláiyuándānhuāmìdechàyìfēnxī