Disease Localization and Severity Assessment in Chest X-Ray Images using Multi-Stage Superpixels Classification

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chest X-ray (CXR) is a non-invasive imaging modality used in the prognosis and management of chronic lung disorders like tuberculosis (TB), pneumonia, coronavirus disease (COVID-19), etc. The radiomic features associated with different disease manifestations assist in detection, localization, and grading the severity of infected lung regions. The majority of the existing computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system used these features for the classification task, and only a few works have been dedicated to disease-localization and severity scoring. Moreover, the existing deep learning approaches use class activation map and Saliency map, which generate a rough localization. This study aims to generate a compact disease boundary, infection map, and grade the infection severity using proposed multistage superpixel classification-based disease localization and severity assessment framework. METHODS: : The proposed method uses a simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) technique to subdivide the lung field into small superpixels. Initially, the different radiomic texture and proposed shape features are extracted and combined to train different benchmark classifiers in a multistage framework. Subsequently, the predicted class labels are used to generate an infection map, mark disease boundary, and grade the infection severity. The performance is evaluated using a publicly available Montgomery dataset and validated using Friedman average ranking and Holm and Nemenyi post-hoc procedures. RESULTS: : The proposed multistage classification approach achieved accuracy (ACC)= 95.52%, F-Measure (FM)= 95.48%, area under the curve (AUC)= 0.955 for Stage-I and ACC=85.35%, FM=85.20%, AUC=0.853 for Stage-II using calibration dataset and ACC = 93.41%, FM = 95.32%, AUC = 0.936 for Stage-I and ACC = 84.02%, FM = 71.01%, AUC = 0.795 for Stage-II using validation dataset. Also, the model has demonstrated the average Jaccard Index (JI) of 0.82 and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9589. CONCLUSIONS: : The obtained classification results using calibration and validation dataset confirms the promising performance of the proposed framework. Also, the average JI shows promising potential to localize the disease, and better agreement between radiologist score and predicted severity score (r) confirms the robustness of the method. Finally, the statistical test justified the significance of the obtained results.