Cargando…

Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation

During the pre-vaccine period, the success of containing the spread of COVID-19 depends upon how communities respond to non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies such as social distancing, wearing of masks, retail and dining constraints, crowd limitation, and shelter-in-place orders. Of these policies,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Meng-Hao, Haynes, Kingsley, Kulkarni, Rajendra, Siddique, Abu Bakkar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115308
_version_ 1784773539728982016
author Li, Meng-Hao
Haynes, Kingsley
Kulkarni, Rajendra
Siddique, Abu Bakkar
author_facet Li, Meng-Hao
Haynes, Kingsley
Kulkarni, Rajendra
Siddique, Abu Bakkar
author_sort Li, Meng-Hao
collection PubMed
description During the pre-vaccine period, the success of containing the spread of COVID-19 depends upon how communities respond to non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies such as social distancing, wearing of masks, retail and dining constraints, crowd limitation, and shelter-in-place orders. Of these policies, shelter-in-place and social distancing are of central importance. By using county-level mobility data as a measure of a community's voluntary compliance with social distancing policies, this study found that counties who received strong state social distancing policy directives and who had a high pro-social character showed lower mobility on retail and recreation mobility and grocery and pharmacy mobility (better social distancing) after states reopened from shelter-in-place orders. Counties that experienced a longer duration of shelter-in-place orders showed higher mobility (less social distancing), implying that the duration of the shelter-in-place order deteriorated social distancing response after reopening. This may be because reopening sent a “safe” signal to these counties or resulted in a response to the pent-up demand inducing higher mobility. The results indicate that implementing shelter-in-place and social distancing policies to slow down the transmission of COVID-19 were not necessarily effective in motivating a county to reduce mobility voluntarily. A county's pro-social character and the duration of shelter-in-place order should be considered when designing COVID-19 mitigation policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9404080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94040802022-08-25 Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation Li, Meng-Hao Haynes, Kingsley Kulkarni, Rajendra Siddique, Abu Bakkar Soc Sci Med Article During the pre-vaccine period, the success of containing the spread of COVID-19 depends upon how communities respond to non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies such as social distancing, wearing of masks, retail and dining constraints, crowd limitation, and shelter-in-place orders. Of these policies, shelter-in-place and social distancing are of central importance. By using county-level mobility data as a measure of a community's voluntary compliance with social distancing policies, this study found that counties who received strong state social distancing policy directives and who had a high pro-social character showed lower mobility on retail and recreation mobility and grocery and pharmacy mobility (better social distancing) after states reopened from shelter-in-place orders. Counties that experienced a longer duration of shelter-in-place orders showed higher mobility (less social distancing), implying that the duration of the shelter-in-place order deteriorated social distancing response after reopening. This may be because reopening sent a “safe” signal to these counties or resulted in a response to the pent-up demand inducing higher mobility. The results indicate that implementing shelter-in-place and social distancing policies to slow down the transmission of COVID-19 were not necessarily effective in motivating a county to reduce mobility voluntarily. A county's pro-social character and the duration of shelter-in-place order should be considered when designing COVID-19 mitigation policies. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-10 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9404080/ /pubmed/36041237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115308 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Meng-Hao
Haynes, Kingsley
Kulkarni, Rajendra
Siddique, Abu Bakkar
Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation
title Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation
title_full Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation
title_fullStr Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation
title_short Determinants of voluntary compliance: COVID-19 mitigation
title_sort determinants of voluntary compliance: covid-19 mitigation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115308
work_keys_str_mv AT limenghao determinantsofvoluntarycompliancecovid19mitigation
AT hayneskingsley determinantsofvoluntarycompliancecovid19mitigation
AT kulkarnirajendra determinantsofvoluntarycompliancecovid19mitigation
AT siddiqueabubakkar determinantsofvoluntarycompliancecovid19mitigation