Cargando…
Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions
BACKGROUND: Although treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer (LPC) are preference-sensitive, the extent to which individuals with LPC receive preference-concordant treatment is unclear. In a sample of individuals with LPC, the purpose of this study was to (a) assess concordance between the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01972-w |
_version_ | 1784773674714267648 |
---|---|
author | Pozzar, Rachel A. Xiong, Niya Hong, Fangxin Filson, Christopher P. Chang, Peter Halpenny, Barbara Berry, Donna L. |
author_facet | Pozzar, Rachel A. Xiong, Niya Hong, Fangxin Filson, Christopher P. Chang, Peter Halpenny, Barbara Berry, Donna L. |
author_sort | Pozzar, Rachel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer (LPC) are preference-sensitive, the extent to which individuals with LPC receive preference-concordant treatment is unclear. In a sample of individuals with LPC, the purpose of this study was to (a) assess concordance between the influence of potential adverse treatment outcomes and treatment choice; (b) determine whether receipt of a decision aid predicts higher odds of concordance; and (c) identify predictors of concordance from a set of participant characteristics and influential personal factors. METHODS: Participants reported the influence of potential adverse treatment outcomes and personal factors on treatment decisions at baseline. Preference-concordant treatment was defined as (a) any treatment if risk of adverse outcomes did not have a lot of influence, (b) active surveillance if risk of adverse outcomes had a lot of influence, or (c) radical prostatectomy or active surveillance if risk of adverse bowel outcomes had a lot of influence and risk of other adverse outcomes did not have a lot of influence. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 224 participants, 137 (61%) pursued treatment concordant with preferences related to adverse treatment outcomes. Receipt of a decision aid did not predict higher odds of concordance. Low tumor risk and age ≥ 60 years predicted higher odds of concordance, while attributing a lot of influence to the impact of treatment on recreation predicted lower odds of concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of potential adverse treatment outcomes may not be the foremost consideration of some patients with LPC. Assessment of the relative importance of patients’ stated values and preferences is warranted in the setting of LPC treatment decision making. Clinical trial registration: NCT01844999 (www.clinicaltrials.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01972-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9404592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94045922022-08-26 Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions Pozzar, Rachel A. Xiong, Niya Hong, Fangxin Filson, Christopher P. Chang, Peter Halpenny, Barbara Berry, Donna L. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Although treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer (LPC) are preference-sensitive, the extent to which individuals with LPC receive preference-concordant treatment is unclear. In a sample of individuals with LPC, the purpose of this study was to (a) assess concordance between the influence of potential adverse treatment outcomes and treatment choice; (b) determine whether receipt of a decision aid predicts higher odds of concordance; and (c) identify predictors of concordance from a set of participant characteristics and influential personal factors. METHODS: Participants reported the influence of potential adverse treatment outcomes and personal factors on treatment decisions at baseline. Preference-concordant treatment was defined as (a) any treatment if risk of adverse outcomes did not have a lot of influence, (b) active surveillance if risk of adverse outcomes had a lot of influence, or (c) radical prostatectomy or active surveillance if risk of adverse bowel outcomes had a lot of influence and risk of other adverse outcomes did not have a lot of influence. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 224 participants, 137 (61%) pursued treatment concordant with preferences related to adverse treatment outcomes. Receipt of a decision aid did not predict higher odds of concordance. Low tumor risk and age ≥ 60 years predicted higher odds of concordance, while attributing a lot of influence to the impact of treatment on recreation predicted lower odds of concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of potential adverse treatment outcomes may not be the foremost consideration of some patients with LPC. Assessment of the relative importance of patients’ stated values and preferences is warranted in the setting of LPC treatment decision making. Clinical trial registration: NCT01844999 (www.clinicaltrials.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01972-w. BioMed Central 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9404592/ /pubmed/36002847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01972-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pozzar, Rachel A. Xiong, Niya Hong, Fangxin Filson, Christopher P. Chang, Peter Halpenny, Barbara Berry, Donna L. Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
title | Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
title_full | Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
title_fullStr | Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
title_short | Concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
title_sort | concordance between influential adverse treatment outcomes and localized prostate cancer treatment decisions |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36002847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01972-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pozzarrachela concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions AT xiongniya concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions AT hongfangxin concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions AT filsonchristopherp concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions AT changpeter concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions AT halpennybarbara concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions AT berrydonnal concordancebetweeninfluentialadversetreatmentoutcomesandlocalizedprostatecancertreatmentdecisions |