Cargando…

Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report

BACKGROUND: The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Matthew L., Javidan, Pooya, Early, Sam, Bugbee, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00134-7
_version_ 1784773675195564032
author Brown, Matthew L.
Javidan, Pooya
Early, Sam
Bugbee, William
author_facet Brown, Matthew L.
Javidan, Pooya
Early, Sam
Bugbee, William
author_sort Brown, Matthew L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revision change. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason for revision TKA at our institution among early and late failures and assess if the etiology has changed over a 10-year time-period. METHODS: We identified 258 revision TKAs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Reasons for revision TKA were categorized according to diagnosis. We also conducted subgroup analysis for TKA revisions performed within two years of the primary TKA (early failures) and those performed after two years (late failures). Revision TKAs were also grouped by year of primary TKA (before and after 2000) and time period in which the revision TKA was performed (2005–2009 and 2010–2014). RESULTS: The most common reason for revision TKA was infection (29.3%), followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%), which together accounted for half of all revisions. Other indications for revision were instability (11.6%), osteolysis (10.4%), arthrofibrosis (8.1%), polyethylene (PE) wear (7.7%), malalignment/malposition (5.4%), patellar complication (3.1%), periprosthetic fracture (2.3%), pain (1.5%), and extensor mechanism deficiency (0.8%). Nearly half of early failures (47%) were due to infection. Osteolysis and PE wear made of a significantly higher proportion of revisions of TKAs performed prior to 2000 compared to index TKAs performed after 2000. CONCLUSION: At our institution, infection was the most common reason for revision TKA. Infection had a higher rate of early revisions. Proportion of TKAs revised for osteolysis and PE wear was higher for TKAs performed prior to 2000. Proportion of revision TKA for infection and instability were higher with TKAs performed after 2000.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9404596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94045962022-08-26 Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report Brown, Matthew L. Javidan, Pooya Early, Sam Bugbee, William Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revision change. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason for revision TKA at our institution among early and late failures and assess if the etiology has changed over a 10-year time-period. METHODS: We identified 258 revision TKAs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Reasons for revision TKA were categorized according to diagnosis. We also conducted subgroup analysis for TKA revisions performed within two years of the primary TKA (early failures) and those performed after two years (late failures). Revision TKAs were also grouped by year of primary TKA (before and after 2000) and time period in which the revision TKA was performed (2005–2009 and 2010–2014). RESULTS: The most common reason for revision TKA was infection (29.3%), followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%), which together accounted for half of all revisions. Other indications for revision were instability (11.6%), osteolysis (10.4%), arthrofibrosis (8.1%), polyethylene (PE) wear (7.7%), malalignment/malposition (5.4%), patellar complication (3.1%), periprosthetic fracture (2.3%), pain (1.5%), and extensor mechanism deficiency (0.8%). Nearly half of early failures (47%) were due to infection. Osteolysis and PE wear made of a significantly higher proportion of revisions of TKAs performed prior to 2000 compared to index TKAs performed after 2000. CONCLUSION: At our institution, infection was the most common reason for revision TKA. Infection had a higher rate of early revisions. Proportion of TKAs revised for osteolysis and PE wear was higher for TKAs performed prior to 2000. Proportion of revision TKA for infection and instability were higher with TKAs performed after 2000. BioMed Central 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9404596/ /pubmed/36008846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00134-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Brown, Matthew L.
Javidan, Pooya
Early, Sam
Bugbee, William
Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
title Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
title_full Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
title_fullStr Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
title_full_unstemmed Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
title_short Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
title_sort evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36008846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00134-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brownmatthewl evolvingetiologiesandratesofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastya10yearinstitutionalreport
AT javidanpooya evolvingetiologiesandratesofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastya10yearinstitutionalreport
AT earlysam evolvingetiologiesandratesofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastya10yearinstitutionalreport
AT bugbeewilliam evolvingetiologiesandratesofrevisiontotalkneearthroplastya10yearinstitutionalreport