Cargando…
Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis
Our aim was to assess whether newer carbapenems with a better administration profile than meropenem (ertapenem, faropenem and tebipenem) were more effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis including M/XDRTB and determine if there was a synergistic/antagonistic effect with amoxicillin or clavulana...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081070 |
_version_ | 1784773698163572736 |
---|---|
author | Gonzalo, Ximena Drobniewski, Francis |
author_facet | Gonzalo, Ximena Drobniewski, Francis |
author_sort | Gonzalo, Ximena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aim was to assess whether newer carbapenems with a better administration profile than meropenem (ertapenem, faropenem and tebipenem) were more effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis including M/XDRTB and determine if there was a synergistic/antagonistic effect with amoxicillin or clavulanate (inhibitor of beta-lactamases that MTB possesses) in vitro. Whilst meropenem is given three times a day intravenously, ertapenem, though given parenterally, is given once a day, faropenem and tebipenem are given orally. Eighty-two clinical drug-sensitive and -resistant MTB strains and a laboratory strain, H37Rv, were assessed by a microdilution methodology against ertapenem, faropenem, tebipenem and meropenem with and without amoxicillin or clavulanic acid. Ertapenem showed a limited activity. The addition of amoxicillin and clavulanate did not translate into significant improvements in susceptibility. Sixty-two isolates (75.6%) exhibited susceptibility to faropenem; the addition of amoxicillin and clavulanate further reduced the MIC in some isolates. Faropenem showed a limited activity (MIC of 8 mg/L or lower) in 21 strains completely resistant to meropenem (MIC of 16 mg/L or higher). Fifteen of the meropenem-resistant strains were susceptible to tebipenem. Carbapenems’ activity has been reported extensively. However, there remains uncertainty as to which of them is most active against TB and what the testing methodology should be. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9404707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94047072022-08-26 Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis Gonzalo, Ximena Drobniewski, Francis Antibiotics (Basel) Article Our aim was to assess whether newer carbapenems with a better administration profile than meropenem (ertapenem, faropenem and tebipenem) were more effective against Mycobacterium tuberculosis including M/XDRTB and determine if there was a synergistic/antagonistic effect with amoxicillin or clavulanate (inhibitor of beta-lactamases that MTB possesses) in vitro. Whilst meropenem is given three times a day intravenously, ertapenem, though given parenterally, is given once a day, faropenem and tebipenem are given orally. Eighty-two clinical drug-sensitive and -resistant MTB strains and a laboratory strain, H37Rv, were assessed by a microdilution methodology against ertapenem, faropenem, tebipenem and meropenem with and without amoxicillin or clavulanic acid. Ertapenem showed a limited activity. The addition of amoxicillin and clavulanate did not translate into significant improvements in susceptibility. Sixty-two isolates (75.6%) exhibited susceptibility to faropenem; the addition of amoxicillin and clavulanate further reduced the MIC in some isolates. Faropenem showed a limited activity (MIC of 8 mg/L or lower) in 21 strains completely resistant to meropenem (MIC of 16 mg/L or higher). Fifteen of the meropenem-resistant strains were susceptible to tebipenem. Carbapenems’ activity has been reported extensively. However, there remains uncertainty as to which of them is most active against TB and what the testing methodology should be. MDPI 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9404707/ /pubmed/36009939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081070 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gonzalo, Ximena Drobniewski, Francis Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis |
title | Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis |
title_full | Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis |
title_fullStr | Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis |
title_short | Are the Newer Carbapenems of Any Value against Tuberculosis |
title_sort | are the newer carbapenems of any value against tuberculosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009939 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzaloximena arethenewercarbapenemsofanyvalueagainsttuberculosis AT drobniewskifrancis arethenewercarbapenemsofanyvalueagainsttuberculosis |