Cargando…
In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed fol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080388 |
_version_ | 1784773739980783616 |
---|---|
author | Touya, Nicolas Washio, Ayako Kitamura, Chiaki Naveau, Adrien Tabata, Yasuhiko Devillard, Raphaël Kérourédan, Olivia |
author_facet | Touya, Nicolas Washio, Ayako Kitamura, Chiaki Naveau, Adrien Tabata, Yasuhiko Devillard, Raphaël Kérourédan, Olivia |
author_sort | Touya, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO method. After the initial selection, 51 articles were included. Silicon in ink formulations was mostly found to be in either the native material, but associated with a secondary role, or to be a crucial additive element used to dope an existing material. The inks and materials presented here were essentially extrusion-based 3D-printed (80%), and, overall, the most investigated animal model was the rabbit (65%) with a femoral defect (51%). Quality (ARRIVE 2.0) and risk of bias (SYRCLE) assessments outlined that although a large majority of ARRIVE items were “reported”, most risks of bias were left “unclear” due to a lack of precise information. Almost all studies, despite a broad range of strategies and formulations, reported their silica-derived material to improve bone regeneration. The rising number of publications over the past few years highlights Si as a leverage element for bone tissue engineering to closely consider in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9404869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94048692022-08-26 In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review Touya, Nicolas Washio, Ayako Kitamura, Chiaki Naveau, Adrien Tabata, Yasuhiko Devillard, Raphaël Kérourédan, Olivia Bioengineering (Basel) Systematic Review As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO method. After the initial selection, 51 articles were included. Silicon in ink formulations was mostly found to be in either the native material, but associated with a secondary role, or to be a crucial additive element used to dope an existing material. The inks and materials presented here were essentially extrusion-based 3D-printed (80%), and, overall, the most investigated animal model was the rabbit (65%) with a femoral defect (51%). Quality (ARRIVE 2.0) and risk of bias (SYRCLE) assessments outlined that although a large majority of ARRIVE items were “reported”, most risks of bias were left “unclear” due to a lack of precise information. Almost all studies, despite a broad range of strategies and formulations, reported their silica-derived material to improve bone regeneration. The rising number of publications over the past few years highlights Si as a leverage element for bone tissue engineering to closely consider in the future. MDPI 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9404869/ /pubmed/36004914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080388 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Touya, Nicolas Washio, Ayako Kitamura, Chiaki Naveau, Adrien Tabata, Yasuhiko Devillard, Raphaël Kérourédan, Olivia In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review |
title | In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review |
title_full | In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review |
title_short | In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review |
title_sort | in vivo application of silica-derived inks for bone tissue engineering: a 10-year systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT touyanicolas invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview AT washioayako invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview AT kitamurachiaki invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview AT naveauadrien invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview AT tabatayasuhiko invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview AT devillardraphael invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview AT kerouredanolivia invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview |