Cargando…

In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review

As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Touya, Nicolas, Washio, Ayako, Kitamura, Chiaki, Naveau, Adrien, Tabata, Yasuhiko, Devillard, Raphaël, Kérourédan, Olivia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080388
_version_ 1784773739980783616
author Touya, Nicolas
Washio, Ayako
Kitamura, Chiaki
Naveau, Adrien
Tabata, Yasuhiko
Devillard, Raphaël
Kérourédan, Olivia
author_facet Touya, Nicolas
Washio, Ayako
Kitamura, Chiaki
Naveau, Adrien
Tabata, Yasuhiko
Devillard, Raphaël
Kérourédan, Olivia
author_sort Touya, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO method. After the initial selection, 51 articles were included. Silicon in ink formulations was mostly found to be in either the native material, but associated with a secondary role, or to be a crucial additive element used to dope an existing material. The inks and materials presented here were essentially extrusion-based 3D-printed (80%), and, overall, the most investigated animal model was the rabbit (65%) with a femoral defect (51%). Quality (ARRIVE 2.0) and risk of bias (SYRCLE) assessments outlined that although a large majority of ARRIVE items were “reported”, most risks of bias were left “unclear” due to a lack of precise information. Almost all studies, despite a broad range of strategies and formulations, reported their silica-derived material to improve bone regeneration. The rising number of publications over the past few years highlights Si as a leverage element for bone tissue engineering to closely consider in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9404869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94048692022-08-26 In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review Touya, Nicolas Washio, Ayako Kitamura, Chiaki Naveau, Adrien Tabata, Yasuhiko Devillard, Raphaël Kérourédan, Olivia Bioengineering (Basel) Systematic Review As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO method. After the initial selection, 51 articles were included. Silicon in ink formulations was mostly found to be in either the native material, but associated with a secondary role, or to be a crucial additive element used to dope an existing material. The inks and materials presented here were essentially extrusion-based 3D-printed (80%), and, overall, the most investigated animal model was the rabbit (65%) with a femoral defect (51%). Quality (ARRIVE 2.0) and risk of bias (SYRCLE) assessments outlined that although a large majority of ARRIVE items were “reported”, most risks of bias were left “unclear” due to a lack of precise information. Almost all studies, despite a broad range of strategies and formulations, reported their silica-derived material to improve bone regeneration. The rising number of publications over the past few years highlights Si as a leverage element for bone tissue engineering to closely consider in the future. MDPI 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9404869/ /pubmed/36004914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080388 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Touya, Nicolas
Washio, Ayako
Kitamura, Chiaki
Naveau, Adrien
Tabata, Yasuhiko
Devillard, Raphaël
Kérourédan, Olivia
In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
title In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
title_full In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
title_fullStr In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
title_short In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review
title_sort in vivo application of silica-derived inks for bone tissue engineering: a 10-year systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004914
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9080388
work_keys_str_mv AT touyanicolas invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview
AT washioayako invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview
AT kitamurachiaki invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview
AT naveauadrien invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview
AT tabatayasuhiko invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview
AT devillardraphael invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview
AT kerouredanolivia invivoapplicationofsilicaderivedinksforbonetissueengineeringa10yearsystematicreview