Cargando…
Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients
Background: The eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation are constantly evolving, following the continuous progress in technology, knowledge about cochlear implant (CI) fitting, and the possibility to preserve residual hearing. Appropriate attention should be given to asymmetric hearing loss (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12040042 |
_version_ | 1784773755116978176 |
---|---|
author | Achena, Andrea Achena, Francesco Dragonetti, Alberto Giulio Sechi, Serena Pili, Andrea Walter Locci, Maria Cristina Turnu, Giuseppe Maniaci, Antonino Ferlito, Salvatore |
author_facet | Achena, Andrea Achena, Francesco Dragonetti, Alberto Giulio Sechi, Serena Pili, Andrea Walter Locci, Maria Cristina Turnu, Giuseppe Maniaci, Antonino Ferlito, Salvatore |
author_sort | Achena, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation are constantly evolving, following the continuous progress in technology, knowledge about cochlear implant (CI) fitting, and the possibility to preserve residual hearing. Appropriate attention should be given to asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and single-side deafness (SSD) subjects. This study aimed to analyze cochlear implant indications and evaluate the longitudinal performance outcomes for patients with different kinds and degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Methods: A total of 69 adult hearing loss CI recipients were included and divided into four subgroups according to our CI indication criteria. We performed objective and subjective measures, including speech perception analysis in silence and with background noise, comparing the outcomes obtained in the four groups. Results: After cochlear implant surgery, concerning the preimplantation daily listening condition, a significantly improved speech perception score in silence and noise was found in all four groups (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: CI could represent an efficient solution for patients with AHL and SSD classes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9404933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94049332022-08-26 Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients Achena, Andrea Achena, Francesco Dragonetti, Alberto Giulio Sechi, Serena Pili, Andrea Walter Locci, Maria Cristina Turnu, Giuseppe Maniaci, Antonino Ferlito, Salvatore Audiol Res Article Background: The eligibility criteria for cochlear implantation are constantly evolving, following the continuous progress in technology, knowledge about cochlear implant (CI) fitting, and the possibility to preserve residual hearing. Appropriate attention should be given to asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and single-side deafness (SSD) subjects. This study aimed to analyze cochlear implant indications and evaluate the longitudinal performance outcomes for patients with different kinds and degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Methods: A total of 69 adult hearing loss CI recipients were included and divided into four subgroups according to our CI indication criteria. We performed objective and subjective measures, including speech perception analysis in silence and with background noise, comparing the outcomes obtained in the four groups. Results: After cochlear implant surgery, concerning the preimplantation daily listening condition, a significantly improved speech perception score in silence and noise was found in all four groups (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: CI could represent an efficient solution for patients with AHL and SSD classes. MDPI 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9404933/ /pubmed/36004950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12040042 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Achena, Andrea Achena, Francesco Dragonetti, Alberto Giulio Sechi, Serena Pili, Andrea Walter Locci, Maria Cristina Turnu, Giuseppe Maniaci, Antonino Ferlito, Salvatore Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients |
title | Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients |
title_full | Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients |
title_fullStr | Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients |
title_short | Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients |
title_sort | cochlear implant evolving indications: our outcomes in adult patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36004950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/audiolres12040042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT achenaandrea cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT achenafrancesco cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT dragonettialbertogiulio cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT sechiserena cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT piliandreawalter cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT loccimariacristina cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT turnugiuseppe cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT maniaciantonino cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients AT ferlitosalvatore cochlearimplantevolvingindicationsouroutcomesinadultpatients |