Cargando…

Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?

We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isaacson, Stuart H., Pagan, Fernando L., Lew, Mark F., Pahwa, Rajesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100161
_version_ 1784773792658096128
author Isaacson, Stuart H.
Pagan, Fernando L.
Lew, Mark F.
Pahwa, Rajesh
author_facet Isaacson, Stuart H.
Pagan, Fernando L.
Lew, Mark F.
Pahwa, Rajesh
author_sort Isaacson, Stuart H.
collection PubMed
description We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that “on-demand” treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with “ON-extenders”) have failed. Current treatment approaches combine “ON-extenders” with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel “on-demand” treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel “on-demand” treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9405081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94050812022-08-26 Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? Isaacson, Stuart H. Pagan, Fernando L. Lew, Mark F. Pahwa, Rajesh Clin Park Relat Disord Review We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that “on-demand” treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with “ON-extenders”) have failed. Current treatment approaches combine “ON-extenders” with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel “on-demand” treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel “on-demand” treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered. Elsevier 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9405081/ /pubmed/36033905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100161 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Isaacson, Stuart H.
Pagan, Fernando L.
Lew, Mark F.
Pahwa, Rajesh
Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
title Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
title_full Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
title_fullStr Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
title_full_unstemmed Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
title_short Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
title_sort should “on-demand” treatments for parkinson’s disease off episodes be used earlier?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100161
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacsonstuarth shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier
AT paganfernandol shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier
AT lewmarkf shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier
AT pahwarajesh shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier