Cargando…
Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier?
We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100161 |
_version_ | 1784773792658096128 |
---|---|
author | Isaacson, Stuart H. Pagan, Fernando L. Lew, Mark F. Pahwa, Rajesh |
author_facet | Isaacson, Stuart H. Pagan, Fernando L. Lew, Mark F. Pahwa, Rajesh |
author_sort | Isaacson, Stuart H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that “on-demand” treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with “ON-extenders”) have failed. Current treatment approaches combine “ON-extenders” with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel “on-demand” treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel “on-demand” treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9405081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94050812022-08-26 Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? Isaacson, Stuart H. Pagan, Fernando L. Lew, Mark F. Pahwa, Rajesh Clin Park Relat Disord Review We discuss a shift in the treatment paradigm for OFF episode management in patients with Parkinson’s disease, based on clinical experience in the United States (US). Three “on-demand” treatments are currently available in the US as follows: subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa inhalation powder, and sublingual apomorphine. We empirically propose that “on-demand” treatments can be utilized as a complementary treatment when OFF episodes emerge and can be utilized when needed rather than reserving these treatments only until other treatment approaches (adjustment of baseline treatment and/or addition of adjunctive treatment with “ON-extenders”) have failed. Current treatment approaches combine “ON-extenders” with increasing levodopa dosing and/or frequency to treat OFF episodes. Yet, OFF episodes often persist, with a substantial amount of daily OFF time. OFF episode treatment is hindered by variable gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of oral levodopa, reflecting GI dysmotility and protein competition. Novel “on-demand” treatments bypass the gut and can improve OFF symptoms more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. With the emergence of novel “on-demand” treatments, we conclude that a shift in treatment paradigm to the earlier, complementary use of these medications be considered. Elsevier 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9405081/ /pubmed/36033905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100161 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Isaacson, Stuart H. Pagan, Fernando L. Lew, Mark F. Pahwa, Rajesh Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? |
title | Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? |
title_full | Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? |
title_fullStr | Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? |
title_short | Should “on-demand” treatments for Parkinson’s disease OFF episodes be used earlier? |
title_sort | should “on-demand” treatments for parkinson’s disease off episodes be used earlier? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36033905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT isaacsonstuarth shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier AT paganfernandol shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier AT lewmarkf shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier AT pahwarajesh shouldondemandtreatmentsforparkinsonsdiseaseoffepisodesbeusedearlier |