Cargando…

Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls

SIMPLE SUMMARY: We analyzed the ectoparasite community of a monomorphic and non-social bird, the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia, breeding in rural and urban habitats. Such community was composed by two lice, one mite and one flea species. Rural individuals had more fleas and less mites than urban...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles, López-Montoya, Antonio J., Luna, Álvaro, Romero-Vidal, Pedro, Palma, Antonio, Tella, José L., Carrete, Martina, Liébanas, Gracia M., Pérez, Jesús M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141
_version_ 1784773823223037952
author Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles
López-Montoya, Antonio J.
Luna, Álvaro
Romero-Vidal, Pedro
Palma, Antonio
Tella, José L.
Carrete, Martina
Liébanas, Gracia M.
Pérez, Jesús M.
author_facet Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles
López-Montoya, Antonio J.
Luna, Álvaro
Romero-Vidal, Pedro
Palma, Antonio
Tella, José L.
Carrete, Martina
Liébanas, Gracia M.
Pérez, Jesús M.
author_sort Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: We analyzed the ectoparasite community of a monomorphic and non-social bird, the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia, breeding in rural and urban habitats. Such community was composed by two lice, one mite and one flea species. Rural individuals had more fleas and less mites than urban ones. Adult birds harbored less ectoparasites than young ones and females harbored more lice than males. The presence of lice was positively related to the presence of fleas. On the contrary, the presence of mites was negatively related to the presence of fleas and lice. The study of parasite communities in urban and rural populations of the same species can shed light on how urban stressor factors impact the physiology of wildlife inhabiting cities and, therefore, the host-parasite relationships. ABSTRACT: Urbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird–ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9405203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94052032022-08-26 Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles López-Montoya, Antonio J. Luna, Álvaro Romero-Vidal, Pedro Palma, Antonio Tella, José L. Carrete, Martina Liébanas, Gracia M. Pérez, Jesús M. Biology (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: We analyzed the ectoparasite community of a monomorphic and non-social bird, the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia, breeding in rural and urban habitats. Such community was composed by two lice, one mite and one flea species. Rural individuals had more fleas and less mites than urban ones. Adult birds harbored less ectoparasites than young ones and females harbored more lice than males. The presence of lice was positively related to the presence of fleas. On the contrary, the presence of mites was negatively related to the presence of fleas and lice. The study of parasite communities in urban and rural populations of the same species can shed light on how urban stressor factors impact the physiology of wildlife inhabiting cities and, therefore, the host-parasite relationships. ABSTRACT: Urbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird–ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research. MDPI 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9405203/ /pubmed/36009768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles
López-Montoya, Antonio J.
Luna, Álvaro
Romero-Vidal, Pedro
Palma, Antonio
Tella, José L.
Carrete, Martina
Liébanas, Gracia M.
Pérez, Jesús M.
Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
title Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
title_full Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
title_fullStr Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
title_short Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
title_sort drivers of the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns in rural and urban burrowing owls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141
work_keys_str_mv AT saezventuraangeles driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT lopezmontoyaantonioj driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT lunaalvaro driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT romerovidalpedro driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT palmaantonio driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT tellajosel driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT carretemartina driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT liebanasgraciam driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls
AT perezjesusm driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls