Cargando…
Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls
SIMPLE SUMMARY: We analyzed the ectoparasite community of a monomorphic and non-social bird, the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia, breeding in rural and urban habitats. Such community was composed by two lice, one mite and one flea species. Rural individuals had more fleas and less mites than urban...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141 |
_version_ | 1784773823223037952 |
---|---|
author | Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles López-Montoya, Antonio J. Luna, Álvaro Romero-Vidal, Pedro Palma, Antonio Tella, José L. Carrete, Martina Liébanas, Gracia M. Pérez, Jesús M. |
author_facet | Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles López-Montoya, Antonio J. Luna, Álvaro Romero-Vidal, Pedro Palma, Antonio Tella, José L. Carrete, Martina Liébanas, Gracia M. Pérez, Jesús M. |
author_sort | Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: We analyzed the ectoparasite community of a monomorphic and non-social bird, the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia, breeding in rural and urban habitats. Such community was composed by two lice, one mite and one flea species. Rural individuals had more fleas and less mites than urban ones. Adult birds harbored less ectoparasites than young ones and females harbored more lice than males. The presence of lice was positively related to the presence of fleas. On the contrary, the presence of mites was negatively related to the presence of fleas and lice. The study of parasite communities in urban and rural populations of the same species can shed light on how urban stressor factors impact the physiology of wildlife inhabiting cities and, therefore, the host-parasite relationships. ABSTRACT: Urbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird–ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9405203 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94052032022-08-26 Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles López-Montoya, Antonio J. Luna, Álvaro Romero-Vidal, Pedro Palma, Antonio Tella, José L. Carrete, Martina Liébanas, Gracia M. Pérez, Jesús M. Biology (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: We analyzed the ectoparasite community of a monomorphic and non-social bird, the burrowing owl, Athene cunicularia, breeding in rural and urban habitats. Such community was composed by two lice, one mite and one flea species. Rural individuals had more fleas and less mites than urban ones. Adult birds harbored less ectoparasites than young ones and females harbored more lice than males. The presence of lice was positively related to the presence of fleas. On the contrary, the presence of mites was negatively related to the presence of fleas and lice. The study of parasite communities in urban and rural populations of the same species can shed light on how urban stressor factors impact the physiology of wildlife inhabiting cities and, therefore, the host-parasite relationships. ABSTRACT: Urbanization creates new ecological conditions that can affect biodiversity at all levels, including the diversity and prevalence of parasites of species that may occupy these environments. However, few studies have compared bird–ectoparasite interactions between urban and rural individuals. Here, we analyze the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns of urban and rural burrowing owls, Athene cunicularia, to assess the influence of host traits (i.e., sex, age, and weight), and environmental factors (i.e., number of conspecifics per nest, habitat type and aridity) on its composition. Ectoparasites of burrowing owls included two lice, one flea, and one mite. The overall prevalence for mites, lice and fleas was 1.75%, 8.76% and 3.50%, respectively. A clear pattern of co-infection was detected between mites and fleas and, to less extent, between mites and lice. Adult owls harbored fewer ectoparasites than nestlings, and adult females harbored more lice than males. Our results also show that mite and flea numbers were higher when more conspecifics cohabited the same burrow, while lice showed the opposite pattern. Rural individuals showed higher flea parasitism and lower mite parasitism than urban birds. Moreover, mite numbers were negatively correlated with aridity and host weight. Although the ectoparasitic load of burrowing owls appears to be influenced by individual age, sex, number of conspecifics per nest, and habitat characteristics, the pattern of co-infection found among ectoparasites could also be mediated by unexplored factors such as host immune response, which deserves further research. MDPI 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9405203/ /pubmed/36009768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sáez-Ventura, Ángeles López-Montoya, Antonio J. Luna, Álvaro Romero-Vidal, Pedro Palma, Antonio Tella, José L. Carrete, Martina Liébanas, Gracia M. Pérez, Jesús M. Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls |
title | Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls |
title_full | Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls |
title_fullStr | Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls |
title_full_unstemmed | Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls |
title_short | Drivers of the Ectoparasite Community and Co-Infection Patterns in Rural and Urban Burrowing Owls |
title_sort | drivers of the ectoparasite community and co-infection patterns in rural and urban burrowing owls |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405203/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology11081141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saezventuraangeles driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT lopezmontoyaantonioj driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT lunaalvaro driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT romerovidalpedro driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT palmaantonio driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT tellajosel driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT carretemartina driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT liebanasgraciam driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls AT perezjesusm driversoftheectoparasitecommunityandcoinfectionpatternsinruralandurbanburrowingowls |