Cargando…

The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury

The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauer, Henrik, Prahm, Cosima, Thiel, Johannes Tobias, Kolbenschlag, Jonas, Daigeler, Adrien, Hercher, David, Heinzel, Johannes C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081878
_version_ 1784773974660481024
author Lauer, Henrik
Prahm, Cosima
Thiel, Johannes Tobias
Kolbenschlag, Jonas
Daigeler, Adrien
Hercher, David
Heinzel, Johannes C.
author_facet Lauer, Henrik
Prahm, Cosima
Thiel, Johannes Tobias
Kolbenschlag, Jonas
Daigeler, Adrien
Hercher, David
Heinzel, Johannes C.
author_sort Lauer, Henrik
collection PubMed
description The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to the lesion type. According to PRISMA-guidelines, research was performed, including the databases PubMed and Web of Science. Groups were: (1) crush injury, (2) transection with end-to-end or with (3) end-to-side coaptation and (4) isogenic or acellular allogenic grafting. Total and respective number, as well as rat strain, type of nerve defect, length of isogenic or acellular allogenic allografts, time at first signs of motor recovery (FSR) and maximal recovery grasping strength (MRGS), were evaluated. In total, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria. Group I showed earliest signs of motor recovery. Slow recovery was observable in group III and in graft length above 25 mm. Isografts recovered faster compared to other grafts. The onset and course of recovery is heavily dependent from the type of nerve injury. The grasping test should be used complementary in addition to other volitional and non-volitional tests. Repetitive examinations should be planned carefully to optimize assessment of valid and reliable data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9405835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94058352022-08-26 The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury Lauer, Henrik Prahm, Cosima Thiel, Johannes Tobias Kolbenschlag, Jonas Daigeler, Adrien Hercher, David Heinzel, Johannes C. Biomedicines Systematic Review The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to the lesion type. According to PRISMA-guidelines, research was performed, including the databases PubMed and Web of Science. Groups were: (1) crush injury, (2) transection with end-to-end or with (3) end-to-side coaptation and (4) isogenic or acellular allogenic grafting. Total and respective number, as well as rat strain, type of nerve defect, length of isogenic or acellular allogenic allografts, time at first signs of motor recovery (FSR) and maximal recovery grasping strength (MRGS), were evaluated. In total, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria. Group I showed earliest signs of motor recovery. Slow recovery was observable in group III and in graft length above 25 mm. Isografts recovered faster compared to other grafts. The onset and course of recovery is heavily dependent from the type of nerve injury. The grasping test should be used complementary in addition to other volitional and non-volitional tests. Repetitive examinations should be planned carefully to optimize assessment of valid and reliable data. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9405835/ /pubmed/36009423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081878 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Lauer, Henrik
Prahm, Cosima
Thiel, Johannes Tobias
Kolbenschlag, Jonas
Daigeler, Adrien
Hercher, David
Heinzel, Johannes C.
The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
title The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
title_full The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
title_fullStr The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
title_full_unstemmed The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
title_short The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
title_sort grasping test revisited: a systematic review of functional recovery in rat models of median nerve injury
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081878
work_keys_str_mv AT lauerhenrik thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT prahmcosima thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT thieljohannestobias thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT kolbenschlagjonas thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT daigeleradrien thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT hercherdavid thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT heinzeljohannesc thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT lauerhenrik graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT prahmcosima graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT thieljohannestobias graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT kolbenschlagjonas graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT daigeleradrien graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT hercherdavid graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury
AT heinzeljohannesc graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury