Cargando…
The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury
The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081878 |
_version_ | 1784773974660481024 |
---|---|
author | Lauer, Henrik Prahm, Cosima Thiel, Johannes Tobias Kolbenschlag, Jonas Daigeler, Adrien Hercher, David Heinzel, Johannes C. |
author_facet | Lauer, Henrik Prahm, Cosima Thiel, Johannes Tobias Kolbenschlag, Jonas Daigeler, Adrien Hercher, David Heinzel, Johannes C. |
author_sort | Lauer, Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to the lesion type. According to PRISMA-guidelines, research was performed, including the databases PubMed and Web of Science. Groups were: (1) crush injury, (2) transection with end-to-end or with (3) end-to-side coaptation and (4) isogenic or acellular allogenic grafting. Total and respective number, as well as rat strain, type of nerve defect, length of isogenic or acellular allogenic allografts, time at first signs of motor recovery (FSR) and maximal recovery grasping strength (MRGS), were evaluated. In total, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria. Group I showed earliest signs of motor recovery. Slow recovery was observable in group III and in graft length above 25 mm. Isografts recovered faster compared to other grafts. The onset and course of recovery is heavily dependent from the type of nerve injury. The grasping test should be used complementary in addition to other volitional and non-volitional tests. Repetitive examinations should be planned carefully to optimize assessment of valid and reliable data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9405835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94058352022-08-26 The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury Lauer, Henrik Prahm, Cosima Thiel, Johannes Tobias Kolbenschlag, Jonas Daigeler, Adrien Hercher, David Heinzel, Johannes C. Biomedicines Systematic Review The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to the lesion type. According to PRISMA-guidelines, research was performed, including the databases PubMed and Web of Science. Groups were: (1) crush injury, (2) transection with end-to-end or with (3) end-to-side coaptation and (4) isogenic or acellular allogenic grafting. Total and respective number, as well as rat strain, type of nerve defect, length of isogenic or acellular allogenic allografts, time at first signs of motor recovery (FSR) and maximal recovery grasping strength (MRGS), were evaluated. In total, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria. Group I showed earliest signs of motor recovery. Slow recovery was observable in group III and in graft length above 25 mm. Isografts recovered faster compared to other grafts. The onset and course of recovery is heavily dependent from the type of nerve injury. The grasping test should be used complementary in addition to other volitional and non-volitional tests. Repetitive examinations should be planned carefully to optimize assessment of valid and reliable data. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9405835/ /pubmed/36009423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081878 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Lauer, Henrik Prahm, Cosima Thiel, Johannes Tobias Kolbenschlag, Jonas Daigeler, Adrien Hercher, David Heinzel, Johannes C. The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury |
title | The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury |
title_full | The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury |
title_fullStr | The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury |
title_short | The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury |
title_sort | grasping test revisited: a systematic review of functional recovery in rat models of median nerve injury |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10081878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lauerhenrik thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT prahmcosima thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT thieljohannestobias thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT kolbenschlagjonas thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT daigeleradrien thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT hercherdavid thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT heinzeljohannesc thegraspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT lauerhenrik graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT prahmcosima graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT thieljohannestobias graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT kolbenschlagjonas graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT daigeleradrien graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT hercherdavid graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury AT heinzeljohannesc graspingtestrevisitedasystematicreviewoffunctionalrecoveryinratmodelsofmediannerveinjury |