Cargando…
Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences
Task fMRI provides an opportunity to analyze the working mechanisms of the human brain during specific experimental paradigms. Deep learning models have increasingly been applied for decoding and encoding purposes study to representations in task fMRI data. More recently, graph neural networks, or n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081094 |
_version_ | 1784773992945549312 |
---|---|
author | Saeidi, Maham Karwowski, Waldemar Farahani, Farzad V. Fiok, Krzysztof Hancock, P. A. Sawyer, Ben D. Christov-Moore, Leonardo Douglas, Pamela K. |
author_facet | Saeidi, Maham Karwowski, Waldemar Farahani, Farzad V. Fiok, Krzysztof Hancock, P. A. Sawyer, Ben D. Christov-Moore, Leonardo Douglas, Pamela K. |
author_sort | Saeidi, Maham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Task fMRI provides an opportunity to analyze the working mechanisms of the human brain during specific experimental paradigms. Deep learning models have increasingly been applied for decoding and encoding purposes study to representations in task fMRI data. More recently, graph neural networks, or neural networks models designed to leverage the properties of graph representations, have recently shown promise in task fMRI decoding studies. Here, we propose an end-to-end graph convolutional network (GCN) framework with three convolutional layers to classify task fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project dataset. We compared the predictive performance of our GCN model across four of the most widely used node embedding algorithms—NetMF, RandNE, Node2Vec, and Walklets—to automatically extract the structural properties of the nodes in the functional graph. The empirical results indicated that our GCN framework accurately predicted individual differences (0.978 and 0.976) with the NetMF and RandNE embedding methods, respectively. Furthermore, to assess the effects of individual differences, we tested the classification performance of the model on sub-datasets divided according to gender and fluid intelligence. Experimental results indicated significant differences in the classification predictions of gender, but not high/low fluid intelligence fMRI data. Our experiments yielded promising results and demonstrated the superior ability of our GCN in modeling task fMRI data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9405908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94059082022-08-26 Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences Saeidi, Maham Karwowski, Waldemar Farahani, Farzad V. Fiok, Krzysztof Hancock, P. A. Sawyer, Ben D. Christov-Moore, Leonardo Douglas, Pamela K. Brain Sci Article Task fMRI provides an opportunity to analyze the working mechanisms of the human brain during specific experimental paradigms. Deep learning models have increasingly been applied for decoding and encoding purposes study to representations in task fMRI data. More recently, graph neural networks, or neural networks models designed to leverage the properties of graph representations, have recently shown promise in task fMRI decoding studies. Here, we propose an end-to-end graph convolutional network (GCN) framework with three convolutional layers to classify task fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project dataset. We compared the predictive performance of our GCN model across four of the most widely used node embedding algorithms—NetMF, RandNE, Node2Vec, and Walklets—to automatically extract the structural properties of the nodes in the functional graph. The empirical results indicated that our GCN framework accurately predicted individual differences (0.978 and 0.976) with the NetMF and RandNE embedding methods, respectively. Furthermore, to assess the effects of individual differences, we tested the classification performance of the model on sub-datasets divided according to gender and fluid intelligence. Experimental results indicated significant differences in the classification predictions of gender, but not high/low fluid intelligence fMRI data. Our experiments yielded promising results and demonstrated the superior ability of our GCN in modeling task fMRI data. MDPI 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9405908/ /pubmed/36009157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081094 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Saeidi, Maham Karwowski, Waldemar Farahani, Farzad V. Fiok, Krzysztof Hancock, P. A. Sawyer, Ben D. Christov-Moore, Leonardo Douglas, Pamela K. Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences |
title | Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences |
title_full | Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences |
title_fullStr | Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences |
title_full_unstemmed | Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences |
title_short | Decoding Task-Based fMRI Data with Graph Neural Networks, Considering Individual Differences |
title_sort | decoding task-based fmri data with graph neural networks, considering individual differences |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9405908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36009157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saeidimaham decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT karwowskiwaldemar decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT farahanifarzadv decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT fiokkrzysztof decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT hancockpa decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT sawyerbend decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT christovmooreleonardo decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences AT douglaspamelak decodingtaskbasedfmridatawithgraphneuralnetworksconsideringindividualdifferences |