Cargando…

Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The fast and accurate definition of structures is a main limiting factor in online adaptive proton therapy. In this study, different methods to include structure propagation uncertainties in the optimization were compared with adaptation using physician-drawn structures, uncorrected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nenoff, Lena, Buti, Gregory, Bobić, Mislav, Lalonde, Arthur, Nesteruk, Konrad P., Winey, Brian, Sharp, Gregory Charles, Sudhyadhom, Atchar, Paganetti, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163926
_version_ 1784774033107058688
author Nenoff, Lena
Buti, Gregory
Bobić, Mislav
Lalonde, Arthur
Nesteruk, Konrad P.
Winey, Brian
Sharp, Gregory Charles
Sudhyadhom, Atchar
Paganetti, Harald
author_facet Nenoff, Lena
Buti, Gregory
Bobić, Mislav
Lalonde, Arthur
Nesteruk, Konrad P.
Winey, Brian
Sharp, Gregory Charles
Sudhyadhom, Atchar
Paganetti, Harald
author_sort Nenoff, Lena
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The fast and accurate definition of structures is a main limiting factor in online adaptive proton therapy. In this study, different methods to include structure propagation uncertainties in the optimization were compared with adaptation using physician-drawn structures, uncorrected propagated structures, and no adaptation. While adaptation with physician-drawn structures resulted in the best adaptive plan quality and no adaptation in the worst, manual structure correction could be replaced by a fast ‘plausibility check’, and plans could be adapted with correction-free adaptation strategies. ABSTRACT: Currently, adaptive strategies require time- and resource-intensive manual structure corrections. This study compares different strategies: optimization without manual structure correction, adaptation with physician-drawn structures, and no adaptation. Strategies were compared for 16 patients with pancreas, liver, and head and neck (HN) cancer with 1–5 repeated images during treatment: ‘reference adaptation’, with structures drawn by a physician; ‘single-DIR adaptation’, using a single set of deformably propagated structures; ‘multi-DIR adaptation’, using robust planning with multiple deformed structure sets; ‘conservative adaptation’, using the intersection and union of all deformed structures; ‘probabilistic adaptation’, using the probability of a voxel belonging to the structure in the optimization weight; and ‘no adaptation’. Plans were evaluated using reference structures and compared using a scoring system. The reference adaptation with physician-drawn structures performed best, and no adaptation performed the worst. For pancreas and liver patients, adaptation with a single DIR improved the plan quality over no adaptation. For HN patients, integrating structure uncertainties brought an additional benefit. If resources for manual structure corrections would prevent online adaptation, manual correction could be replaced by a fast ‘plausibility check’, and plans could be adapted with correction-free adaptation strategies. Including structure uncertainties in the optimization has the potential to make online adaptation more automatable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94060682022-08-26 Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans Nenoff, Lena Buti, Gregory Bobić, Mislav Lalonde, Arthur Nesteruk, Konrad P. Winey, Brian Sharp, Gregory Charles Sudhyadhom, Atchar Paganetti, Harald Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The fast and accurate definition of structures is a main limiting factor in online adaptive proton therapy. In this study, different methods to include structure propagation uncertainties in the optimization were compared with adaptation using physician-drawn structures, uncorrected propagated structures, and no adaptation. While adaptation with physician-drawn structures resulted in the best adaptive plan quality and no adaptation in the worst, manual structure correction could be replaced by a fast ‘plausibility check’, and plans could be adapted with correction-free adaptation strategies. ABSTRACT: Currently, adaptive strategies require time- and resource-intensive manual structure corrections. This study compares different strategies: optimization without manual structure correction, adaptation with physician-drawn structures, and no adaptation. Strategies were compared for 16 patients with pancreas, liver, and head and neck (HN) cancer with 1–5 repeated images during treatment: ‘reference adaptation’, with structures drawn by a physician; ‘single-DIR adaptation’, using a single set of deformably propagated structures; ‘multi-DIR adaptation’, using robust planning with multiple deformed structure sets; ‘conservative adaptation’, using the intersection and union of all deformed structures; ‘probabilistic adaptation’, using the probability of a voxel belonging to the structure in the optimization weight; and ‘no adaptation’. Plans were evaluated using reference structures and compared using a scoring system. The reference adaptation with physician-drawn structures performed best, and no adaptation performed the worst. For pancreas and liver patients, adaptation with a single DIR improved the plan quality over no adaptation. For HN patients, integrating structure uncertainties brought an additional benefit. If resources for manual structure corrections would prevent online adaptation, manual correction could be replaced by a fast ‘plausibility check’, and plans could be adapted with correction-free adaptation strategies. Including structure uncertainties in the optimization has the potential to make online adaptation more automatable. MDPI 2022-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9406068/ /pubmed/36010919 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163926 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nenoff, Lena
Buti, Gregory
Bobić, Mislav
Lalonde, Arthur
Nesteruk, Konrad P.
Winey, Brian
Sharp, Gregory Charles
Sudhyadhom, Atchar
Paganetti, Harald
Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans
title Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans
title_full Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans
title_fullStr Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans
title_short Integrating Structure Propagation Uncertainties in the Optimization of Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Plans
title_sort integrating structure propagation uncertainties in the optimization of online adaptive proton therapy plans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010919
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163926
work_keys_str_mv AT nenofflena integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT butigregory integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT bobicmislav integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT lalondearthur integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT nesterukkonradp integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT wineybrian integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT sharpgregorycharles integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT sudhyadhomatchar integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans
AT paganettiharald integratingstructurepropagationuncertaintiesintheoptimizationofonlineadaptiveprotontherapyplans