Cargando…
Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether the difference between “lung age” and real age (L–R) could be useful for the prediction of postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: This retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.794553 |
_version_ | 1784774081817608192 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Zhi-Nuan Weng, Kai Chen, Zhen Peng, Kaiming Kang, Mingqiang |
author_facet | Hong, Zhi-Nuan Weng, Kai Chen, Zhen Peng, Kaiming Kang, Mingqiang |
author_sort | Hong, Zhi-Nuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether the difference between “lung age” and real age (L–R) could be useful for the prediction of postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 625 consecutive patients who had undergone MIE. “Lung age” was determined by the calculation method proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society. According to L–R, patients were classified into three groups: group A: L–R ≦ 0 (n = 104), group B: 15 > L–R > 0 (n = 199), group C: L–R ≥ 15 (n = 322). Clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications evaluated by comprehensive complications index (CCI), and overall survival were compared between the groups. A CCI value >30 indicated a severe postoperative complication. RESULTS: Male, smoking status, smoking index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, lung age, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were associated with group classification. CCI values, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital costs were significantly different among groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that L–R, coronary heart disease, and 3-field lymphadenectomy were significant factors for predicting CCI value >30. Regarding the prediction of CCI value >30, area under the curve value was 0.61(95%: 0.56–0.67), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54) for L–R, Fev1, and Fev1%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, there was a significant difference between group A and group B + C (log-rank test: p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer patients with impaired pulmonary function had a higher risk of severe postoperative complications and poorer prognosis than those with normal pulmonary function. The difference between “lung age” and “real age” seems to be a novel and potential predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94062782022-08-26 Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Hong, Zhi-Nuan Weng, Kai Chen, Zhen Peng, Kaiming Kang, Mingqiang Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether the difference between “lung age” and real age (L–R) could be useful for the prediction of postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 625 consecutive patients who had undergone MIE. “Lung age” was determined by the calculation method proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society. According to L–R, patients were classified into three groups: group A: L–R ≦ 0 (n = 104), group B: 15 > L–R > 0 (n = 199), group C: L–R ≥ 15 (n = 322). Clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications evaluated by comprehensive complications index (CCI), and overall survival were compared between the groups. A CCI value >30 indicated a severe postoperative complication. RESULTS: Male, smoking status, smoking index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, lung age, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were associated with group classification. CCI values, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital costs were significantly different among groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that L–R, coronary heart disease, and 3-field lymphadenectomy were significant factors for predicting CCI value >30. Regarding the prediction of CCI value >30, area under the curve value was 0.61(95%: 0.56–0.67), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54) for L–R, Fev1, and Fev1%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, there was a significant difference between group A and group B + C (log-rank test: p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer patients with impaired pulmonary function had a higher risk of severe postoperative complications and poorer prognosis than those with normal pulmonary function. The difference between “lung age” and “real age” seems to be a novel and potential predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9406278/ /pubmed/36034372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.794553 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hong, Weng, Chen, Peng and Kang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Hong, Zhi-Nuan Weng, Kai Chen, Zhen Peng, Kaiming Kang, Mingqiang Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy |
title | Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy |
title_full | Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy |
title_fullStr | Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy |
title_short | Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy |
title_sort | difference between “lung age” and real age as a novel predictor of postoperative complications, long-term survival for patients with esophageal cancer after minimally invasive esophagectomy |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.794553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongzhinuan differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy AT wengkai differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy AT chenzhen differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy AT pengkaiming differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy AT kangmingqiang differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy |