Cargando…

Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether the difference between “lung age” and real age (L–R) could be useful for the prediction of postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: This retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Zhi-Nuan, Weng, Kai, Chen, Zhen, Peng, Kaiming, Kang, Mingqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.794553
_version_ 1784774081817608192
author Hong, Zhi-Nuan
Weng, Kai
Chen, Zhen
Peng, Kaiming
Kang, Mingqiang
author_facet Hong, Zhi-Nuan
Weng, Kai
Chen, Zhen
Peng, Kaiming
Kang, Mingqiang
author_sort Hong, Zhi-Nuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether the difference between “lung age” and real age (L–R) could be useful for the prediction of postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 625 consecutive patients who had undergone MIE. “Lung age” was determined by the calculation method proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society. According to L–R, patients were classified into three groups: group A: L–R ≦ 0 (n = 104), group B: 15 > L–R > 0 (n = 199), group C: L–R ≥ 15 (n = 322). Clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications evaluated by comprehensive complications index (CCI), and overall survival were compared between the groups. A CCI value >30 indicated a severe postoperative complication. RESULTS: Male, smoking status, smoking index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, lung age, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were associated with group classification. CCI values, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital costs were significantly different among groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that L–R, coronary heart disease, and 3-field lymphadenectomy were significant factors for predicting CCI value >30. Regarding the prediction of CCI value >30, area under the curve value was 0.61(95%: 0.56–0.67), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54) for L–R, Fev1, and Fev1%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, there was a significant difference between group A and group B + C (log-rank test: p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer patients with impaired pulmonary function had a higher risk of severe postoperative complications and poorer prognosis than those with normal pulmonary function. The difference between “lung age” and “real age” seems to be a novel and potential predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94062782022-08-26 Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Hong, Zhi-Nuan Weng, Kai Chen, Zhen Peng, Kaiming Kang, Mingqiang Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether the difference between “lung age” and real age (L–R) could be useful for the prediction of postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with esophageal cancer followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 625 consecutive patients who had undergone MIE. “Lung age” was determined by the calculation method proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society. According to L–R, patients were classified into three groups: group A: L–R ≦ 0 (n = 104), group B: 15 > L–R > 0 (n = 199), group C: L–R ≥ 15 (n = 322). Clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications evaluated by comprehensive complications index (CCI), and overall survival were compared between the groups. A CCI value >30 indicated a severe postoperative complication. RESULTS: Male, smoking status, smoking index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, lung age, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s were associated with group classification. CCI values, postoperative hospital stays, and hospital costs were significantly different among groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that L–R, coronary heart disease, and 3-field lymphadenectomy were significant factors for predicting CCI value >30. Regarding the prediction of CCI value >30, area under the curve value was 0.61(95%: 0.56–0.67), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.40–0.54) for L–R, Fev1, and Fev1%, respectively. Regarding overall survival, there was a significant difference between group A and group B + C (log-rank test: p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal cancer patients with impaired pulmonary function had a higher risk of severe postoperative complications and poorer prognosis than those with normal pulmonary function. The difference between “lung age” and “real age” seems to be a novel and potential predictor of severe postoperative complications and long-term survival. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9406278/ /pubmed/36034372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.794553 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hong, Weng, Chen, Peng and Kang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Hong, Zhi-Nuan
Weng, Kai
Chen, Zhen
Peng, Kaiming
Kang, Mingqiang
Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
title Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
title_full Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
title_fullStr Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
title_full_unstemmed Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
title_short Difference between “Lung Age” and Real Age as a Novel Predictor of Postoperative Complications, Long-Term Survival for Patients with Esophageal Cancer after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
title_sort difference between “lung age” and real age as a novel predictor of postoperative complications, long-term survival for patients with esophageal cancer after minimally invasive esophagectomy
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.794553
work_keys_str_mv AT hongzhinuan differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy
AT wengkai differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy
AT chenzhen differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy
AT pengkaiming differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy
AT kangmingqiang differencebetweenlungageandrealageasanovelpredictorofpostoperativecomplicationslongtermsurvivalforpatientswithesophagealcancerafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomy