Cargando…
Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned
The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration established the Engagement Working Group (WG) to ensure that all key stakeholders had an opportunity to provide input into the development and implementation of the CanREValue Real-World Evidence (RWE) Framework. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080443 |
_version_ | 1784774119017938944 |
---|---|
author | Evans, William K. Takhar, Pam McDonald, Valerie Elias, Martine Binder, Louise Michaud, Stéphanie Tadrous, Mina Muñoz, Caroline Chan, Kelvin K. W. |
author_facet | Evans, William K. Takhar, Pam McDonald, Valerie Elias, Martine Binder, Louise Michaud, Stéphanie Tadrous, Mina Muñoz, Caroline Chan, Kelvin K. W. |
author_sort | Evans, William K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration established the Engagement Working Group (WG) to ensure that all key stakeholders had an opportunity to provide input into the development and implementation of the CanREValue Real-World Evidence (RWE) Framework. Two consultations were held in 2021 to solicit patient perspectives on key policy and data access issues identified in the interim policy and data WG reports. Over 30 individuals, representing patients, caregivers, advocacy leaders, and individuals engaged in patient research were invited to participate. The consultations provided important feedback and valuable lessons in patient engagement. Patient leaders actively shaped the process and content of the consultation. Breakout groups facilitated by patient advocacy leaders gave the opportunity for open and thoughtful contributions from all participants. Important recommendations were made: the RWE framework should not impede access to new drugs; it should be used to support conditional approvals; patient relevant endpoints should be captured in provincial datasets; access to data to conduct RWE should be improved; and privacy issues must be considered. The manuscript documents the CanREValue experience of engaging patients in a consultative process and the useful contributions that can be achieved when the processes to engage are guided by patients themselves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94064302022-08-26 Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned Evans, William K. Takhar, Pam McDonald, Valerie Elias, Martine Binder, Louise Michaud, Stéphanie Tadrous, Mina Muñoz, Caroline Chan, Kelvin K. W. Curr Oncol Commentary The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration established the Engagement Working Group (WG) to ensure that all key stakeholders had an opportunity to provide input into the development and implementation of the CanREValue Real-World Evidence (RWE) Framework. Two consultations were held in 2021 to solicit patient perspectives on key policy and data access issues identified in the interim policy and data WG reports. Over 30 individuals, representing patients, caregivers, advocacy leaders, and individuals engaged in patient research were invited to participate. The consultations provided important feedback and valuable lessons in patient engagement. Patient leaders actively shaped the process and content of the consultation. Breakout groups facilitated by patient advocacy leaders gave the opportunity for open and thoughtful contributions from all participants. Important recommendations were made: the RWE framework should not impede access to new drugs; it should be used to support conditional approvals; patient relevant endpoints should be captured in provincial datasets; access to data to conduct RWE should be improved; and privacy issues must be considered. The manuscript documents the CanREValue experience of engaging patients in a consultative process and the useful contributions that can be achieved when the processes to engage are guided by patients themselves. MDPI 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9406430/ /pubmed/36005181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080443 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Evans, William K. Takhar, Pam McDonald, Valerie Elias, Martine Binder, Louise Michaud, Stéphanie Tadrous, Mina Muñoz, Caroline Chan, Kelvin K. W. Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned |
title | Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned |
title_full | Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned |
title_fullStr | Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned |
title_short | Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned |
title_sort | engaging patients in the canadian real-world evidence for value in cancer drugs (canrevalue) initiative: processes and lessons learned |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evanswilliamk engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT takharpam engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT mcdonaldvalerie engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT eliasmartine engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT binderlouise engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT michaudstephanie engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT tadrousmina engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT munozcaroline engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned AT chankelvinkw engagingpatientsinthecanadianrealworldevidenceforvalueincancerdrugscanrevalueinitiativeprocessesandlessonslearned |