Cargando…

Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study

Objective: This study compared the aerosol and splatter diameter and count numbers produced by a dental mouth prop with a suction holder device and a saliva ejector during ultrasonic scaling in a clinical setting. Methodology: Fluorescein dye was placed in the dental equipment irrigation reservoirs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Engsomboon, Nutthawadee, Pachimsawat, Praewpat, Thanathornwong, Bhornsawan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080142
_version_ 1784774125330366464
author Engsomboon, Nutthawadee
Pachimsawat, Praewpat
Thanathornwong, Bhornsawan
author_facet Engsomboon, Nutthawadee
Pachimsawat, Praewpat
Thanathornwong, Bhornsawan
author_sort Engsomboon, Nutthawadee
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study compared the aerosol and splatter diameter and count numbers produced by a dental mouth prop with a suction holder device and a saliva ejector during ultrasonic scaling in a clinical setting. Methodology: Fluorescein dye was placed in the dental equipment irrigation reservoirs with a mannequin, and an ultrasonic scaler was employed. The procedures were performed three times per device. The upper and bottom board papers were placed on the laboratory platform. All processes used an ultrasonic scaler to generate aerosol and splatter. A dental mouth prop with a suction holder and a saliva ejector were also tested. Photographic analysis was used to examine the fluorescein samples, followed by image processing in Python and assessment of the diameter and count number. For device comparison, statistics were used with an independent t-test. Result: When using the dental mouth prop with a suction holder, the scaler produced aerosol particles that were maintained on the upper board paper (mean ± SD: 1080 ± 662 µm) compared to on the bottom board paper (1230 ± 1020 µm). When the saliva ejector was used, it was found that the diameter of the aerosol on the upper board paper was 900 ± 580 µm, and the diameter on the bottom board paper was 1000 ± 756 µm. Conclusion: There was a significant difference in the aerosol and splatter particle diameter and count number between the dental mouth prop with a suction holder and saliva ejector (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the upper and bottom board papers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94064552022-08-26 Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study Engsomboon, Nutthawadee Pachimsawat, Praewpat Thanathornwong, Bhornsawan Dent J (Basel) Article Objective: This study compared the aerosol and splatter diameter and count numbers produced by a dental mouth prop with a suction holder device and a saliva ejector during ultrasonic scaling in a clinical setting. Methodology: Fluorescein dye was placed in the dental equipment irrigation reservoirs with a mannequin, and an ultrasonic scaler was employed. The procedures were performed three times per device. The upper and bottom board papers were placed on the laboratory platform. All processes used an ultrasonic scaler to generate aerosol and splatter. A dental mouth prop with a suction holder and a saliva ejector were also tested. Photographic analysis was used to examine the fluorescein samples, followed by image processing in Python and assessment of the diameter and count number. For device comparison, statistics were used with an independent t-test. Result: When using the dental mouth prop with a suction holder, the scaler produced aerosol particles that were maintained on the upper board paper (mean ± SD: 1080 ± 662 µm) compared to on the bottom board paper (1230 ± 1020 µm). When the saliva ejector was used, it was found that the diameter of the aerosol on the upper board paper was 900 ± 580 µm, and the diameter on the bottom board paper was 1000 ± 756 µm. Conclusion: There was a significant difference in the aerosol and splatter particle diameter and count number between the dental mouth prop with a suction holder and saliva ejector (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups on the upper and bottom board papers. MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9406455/ /pubmed/36005240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080142 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Engsomboon, Nutthawadee
Pachimsawat, Praewpat
Thanathornwong, Bhornsawan
Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study
title Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study
title_full Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study
title_short Comparative Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter Using Suction Device during Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study
title_sort comparative dissemination of aerosol and splatter using suction device during ultrasonic scaling: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005240
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080142
work_keys_str_mv AT engsomboonnutthawadee comparativedisseminationofaerosolandsplatterusingsuctiondeviceduringultrasonicscalingapilotstudy
AT pachimsawatpraewpat comparativedisseminationofaerosolandsplatterusingsuctiondeviceduringultrasonicscalingapilotstudy
AT thanathornwongbhornsawan comparativedisseminationofaerosolandsplatterusingsuctiondeviceduringultrasonicscalingapilotstudy