Cargando…

Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review

We conducted a systematic review of the current status of machine learning (ML) algorithms’ ability to identify multiple brain diseases, and we evaluated their applicability for improving existing scan acquisition and interpretation workflows. PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheng, Kaining, Offersen, Cecilie Mørck, Middleton, Jon, Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik, Truelsen, Thomas Clement, Pai, Akshay, Johansen, Jacob, Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081878
_version_ 1784774125560004608
author Sheng, Kaining
Offersen, Cecilie Mørck
Middleton, Jon
Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
Truelsen, Thomas Clement
Pai, Akshay
Johansen, Jacob
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_facet Sheng, Kaining
Offersen, Cecilie Mørck
Middleton, Jon
Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
Truelsen, Thomas Clement
Pai, Akshay
Johansen, Jacob
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_sort Sheng, Kaining
collection PubMed
description We conducted a systematic review of the current status of machine learning (ML) algorithms’ ability to identify multiple brain diseases, and we evaluated their applicability for improving existing scan acquisition and interpretation workflows. PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore literature databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2017 and February 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The applicability of ML algorithms for successful workflow improvement was qualitatively assessed based on the satisfaction of three clinical requirements. A total of 19 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. The included studies performed classification tasks (n = 12) and segmentation tasks (n = 7). For classification algorithms, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.765 to 0.997, while accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 80% to 100%, 72% to 100%, and 65% to 100%, respectively. For segmentation algorithms, the Dice coefficient ranged from 0.300 to 0.912. No studies satisfied all clinical requirements for successful workflow improvements due to key limitations pertaining to the study’s design, study data, reference standards, and performance reporting. Standardized reporting guidelines tailored for ML in radiology, prospective study designs, and multi-site testing could help alleviate this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94064562022-08-26 Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review Sheng, Kaining Offersen, Cecilie Mørck Middleton, Jon Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik Truelsen, Thomas Clement Pai, Akshay Johansen, Jacob Nielsen, Michael Bachmann Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review We conducted a systematic review of the current status of machine learning (ML) algorithms’ ability to identify multiple brain diseases, and we evaluated their applicability for improving existing scan acquisition and interpretation workflows. PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore literature databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2017 and February 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The applicability of ML algorithms for successful workflow improvement was qualitatively assessed based on the satisfaction of three clinical requirements. A total of 19 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. The included studies performed classification tasks (n = 12) and segmentation tasks (n = 7). For classification algorithms, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.765 to 0.997, while accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 80% to 100%, 72% to 100%, and 65% to 100%, respectively. For segmentation algorithms, the Dice coefficient ranged from 0.300 to 0.912. No studies satisfied all clinical requirements for successful workflow improvements due to key limitations pertaining to the study’s design, study data, reference standards, and performance reporting. Standardized reporting guidelines tailored for ML in radiology, prospective study designs, and multi-site testing could help alleviate this. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9406456/ /pubmed/36010228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081878 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Sheng, Kaining
Offersen, Cecilie Mørck
Middleton, Jon
Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik
Truelsen, Thomas Clement
Pai, Akshay
Johansen, Jacob
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
title Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
title_full Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
title_short Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
title_sort automated identification of multiple findings on brain mri for improving scan acquisition and interpretation workflows: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081878
work_keys_str_mv AT shengkaining automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT offersenceciliemørck automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT middletonjon automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT carlsenjonathanfrederik automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT truelsenthomasclement automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT paiakshay automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT johansenjacob automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview
AT nielsenmichaelbachmann automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview