Cargando…
Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review
We conducted a systematic review of the current status of machine learning (ML) algorithms’ ability to identify multiple brain diseases, and we evaluated their applicability for improving existing scan acquisition and interpretation workflows. PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081878 |
_version_ | 1784774125560004608 |
---|---|
author | Sheng, Kaining Offersen, Cecilie Mørck Middleton, Jon Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik Truelsen, Thomas Clement Pai, Akshay Johansen, Jacob Nielsen, Michael Bachmann |
author_facet | Sheng, Kaining Offersen, Cecilie Mørck Middleton, Jon Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik Truelsen, Thomas Clement Pai, Akshay Johansen, Jacob Nielsen, Michael Bachmann |
author_sort | Sheng, Kaining |
collection | PubMed |
description | We conducted a systematic review of the current status of machine learning (ML) algorithms’ ability to identify multiple brain diseases, and we evaluated their applicability for improving existing scan acquisition and interpretation workflows. PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore literature databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2017 and February 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The applicability of ML algorithms for successful workflow improvement was qualitatively assessed based on the satisfaction of three clinical requirements. A total of 19 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. The included studies performed classification tasks (n = 12) and segmentation tasks (n = 7). For classification algorithms, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.765 to 0.997, while accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 80% to 100%, 72% to 100%, and 65% to 100%, respectively. For segmentation algorithms, the Dice coefficient ranged from 0.300 to 0.912. No studies satisfied all clinical requirements for successful workflow improvements due to key limitations pertaining to the study’s design, study data, reference standards, and performance reporting. Standardized reporting guidelines tailored for ML in radiology, prospective study designs, and multi-site testing could help alleviate this. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94064562022-08-26 Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review Sheng, Kaining Offersen, Cecilie Mørck Middleton, Jon Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik Truelsen, Thomas Clement Pai, Akshay Johansen, Jacob Nielsen, Michael Bachmann Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review We conducted a systematic review of the current status of machine learning (ML) algorithms’ ability to identify multiple brain diseases, and we evaluated their applicability for improving existing scan acquisition and interpretation workflows. PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore literature databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2017 and February 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The applicability of ML algorithms for successful workflow improvement was qualitatively assessed based on the satisfaction of three clinical requirements. A total of 19 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. The included studies performed classification tasks (n = 12) and segmentation tasks (n = 7). For classification algorithms, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged from 0.765 to 0.997, while accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranged from 80% to 100%, 72% to 100%, and 65% to 100%, respectively. For segmentation algorithms, the Dice coefficient ranged from 0.300 to 0.912. No studies satisfied all clinical requirements for successful workflow improvements due to key limitations pertaining to the study’s design, study data, reference standards, and performance reporting. Standardized reporting guidelines tailored for ML in radiology, prospective study designs, and multi-site testing could help alleviate this. MDPI 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9406456/ /pubmed/36010228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081878 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Sheng, Kaining Offersen, Cecilie Mørck Middleton, Jon Carlsen, Jonathan Frederik Truelsen, Thomas Clement Pai, Akshay Johansen, Jacob Nielsen, Michael Bachmann Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review |
title | Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | automated identification of multiple findings on brain mri for improving scan acquisition and interpretation workflows: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shengkaining automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT offersenceciliemørck automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT middletonjon automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT carlsenjonathanfrederik automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT truelsenthomasclement automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT paiakshay automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT johansenjacob automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview AT nielsenmichaelbachmann automatedidentificationofmultiplefindingsonbrainmriforimprovingscanacquisitionandinterpretationworkflowsasystematicreview |