Cargando…
Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010199 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081848 |
_version_ | 1784774145008992256 |
---|---|
author | Raimondi, Federico Cazzaniga, Sara Annibali, Simona Novelli, Luca Brivio, Matteo Pappacena, Simone Malandrino, Luca Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Bianco, Ilaria Liggeri, Noemi Gritti, Paolo Lorini, Ferdinando Luca Sironi, Sandro Di Marco, Fabiano |
author_facet | Raimondi, Federico Cazzaniga, Sara Annibali, Simona Novelli, Luca Brivio, Matteo Pappacena, Simone Malandrino, Luca Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Bianco, Ilaria Liggeri, Noemi Gritti, Paolo Lorini, Ferdinando Luca Sironi, Sandro Di Marco, Fabiano |
author_sort | Raimondi, Federico |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndrome (ARDS) patients when pronated. Methods: A retrospective study of COVID-19 patients who underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and prone positioning was conducted. Results: Forty-five patients were included. On average, 50% of the overall lung volume was affected by the disease, as observed in the CT-scans, with ground glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidations accounting for 44% and 4%, respectively. The abnormalities were mainly posterior, as demonstrated by posterior/anterior distribution ratios of 1.5 and 4.4 for GGO and consolidation, respectively. The median PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio during NIV in a supine position (SP1) was 140 [IQR 108–169], which improved by 67% (+98) during prone positioning, on average. Once supine positioning was resumed (SP2), the improvement in oxygenation was maintained in 28 patients (62% of the overall population, categorized as “responders”). We found no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of the extent (p = 0.92) and the distribution of parenchymal abnormalities seen in the baseline CT (p = 0.526). Conclusion: Despite the lack of a priori estimation of the sample size, considering the absence of any trends in the differences and correlations, we can reasonably conclude that the baseline chest CT-scan does not predict a gas-exchange response in awake prone-positioned patients with COVID-19 related ARDS. Physicians dealing with this category of patients should not rely on the imaging at presentation when evaluating whether to pronate patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406535 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94065352022-08-26 Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS Raimondi, Federico Cazzaniga, Sara Annibali, Simona Novelli, Luca Brivio, Matteo Pappacena, Simone Malandrino, Luca Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Bianco, Ilaria Liggeri, Noemi Gritti, Paolo Lorini, Ferdinando Luca Sironi, Sandro Di Marco, Fabiano Diagnostics (Basel) Article Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndrome (ARDS) patients when pronated. Methods: A retrospective study of COVID-19 patients who underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and prone positioning was conducted. Results: Forty-five patients were included. On average, 50% of the overall lung volume was affected by the disease, as observed in the CT-scans, with ground glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidations accounting for 44% and 4%, respectively. The abnormalities were mainly posterior, as demonstrated by posterior/anterior distribution ratios of 1.5 and 4.4 for GGO and consolidation, respectively. The median PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio during NIV in a supine position (SP1) was 140 [IQR 108–169], which improved by 67% (+98) during prone positioning, on average. Once supine positioning was resumed (SP2), the improvement in oxygenation was maintained in 28 patients (62% of the overall population, categorized as “responders”). We found no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of the extent (p = 0.92) and the distribution of parenchymal abnormalities seen in the baseline CT (p = 0.526). Conclusion: Despite the lack of a priori estimation of the sample size, considering the absence of any trends in the differences and correlations, we can reasonably conclude that the baseline chest CT-scan does not predict a gas-exchange response in awake prone-positioned patients with COVID-19 related ARDS. Physicians dealing with this category of patients should not rely on the imaging at presentation when evaluating whether to pronate patients. MDPI 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9406535/ /pubmed/36010199 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081848 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Raimondi, Federico Cazzaniga, Sara Annibali, Simona Novelli, Luca Brivio, Matteo Pappacena, Simone Malandrino, Luca Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Bianco, Ilaria Liggeri, Noemi Gritti, Paolo Lorini, Ferdinando Luca Sironi, Sandro Di Marco, Fabiano Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS |
title | Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS |
title_full | Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS |
title_fullStr | Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS |
title_full_unstemmed | Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS |
title_short | Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS |
title_sort | extent and distribution of parenchymal abnormalities in baseline ct-scans do not predict awake prone positioning response in covid-19 related ards |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010199 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081848 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raimondifederico extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT cazzanigasara extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT annibalisimona extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT novelliluca extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT briviomatteo extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT pappacenasimone extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT malandrinoluca extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT bonaffinipietroandrea extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT biancoilaria extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT liggerinoemi extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT grittipaolo extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT loriniferdinandoluca extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT sironisandro extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards AT dimarcofabiano extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards |