Cargando…

Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS

Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raimondi, Federico, Cazzaniga, Sara, Annibali, Simona, Novelli, Luca, Brivio, Matteo, Pappacena, Simone, Malandrino, Luca, Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea, Bianco, Ilaria, Liggeri, Noemi, Gritti, Paolo, Lorini, Ferdinando Luca, Sironi, Sandro, Di Marco, Fabiano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010199
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081848
_version_ 1784774145008992256
author Raimondi, Federico
Cazzaniga, Sara
Annibali, Simona
Novelli, Luca
Brivio, Matteo
Pappacena, Simone
Malandrino, Luca
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Bianco, Ilaria
Liggeri, Noemi
Gritti, Paolo
Lorini, Ferdinando Luca
Sironi, Sandro
Di Marco, Fabiano
author_facet Raimondi, Federico
Cazzaniga, Sara
Annibali, Simona
Novelli, Luca
Brivio, Matteo
Pappacena, Simone
Malandrino, Luca
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Bianco, Ilaria
Liggeri, Noemi
Gritti, Paolo
Lorini, Ferdinando Luca
Sironi, Sandro
Di Marco, Fabiano
author_sort Raimondi, Federico
collection PubMed
description Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndrome (ARDS) patients when pronated. Methods: A retrospective study of COVID-19 patients who underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and prone positioning was conducted. Results: Forty-five patients were included. On average, 50% of the overall lung volume was affected by the disease, as observed in the CT-scans, with ground glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidations accounting for 44% and 4%, respectively. The abnormalities were mainly posterior, as demonstrated by posterior/anterior distribution ratios of 1.5 and 4.4 for GGO and consolidation, respectively. The median PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio during NIV in a supine position (SP1) was 140 [IQR 108–169], which improved by 67% (+98) during prone positioning, on average. Once supine positioning was resumed (SP2), the improvement in oxygenation was maintained in 28 patients (62% of the overall population, categorized as “responders”). We found no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of the extent (p = 0.92) and the distribution of parenchymal abnormalities seen in the baseline CT (p = 0.526). Conclusion: Despite the lack of a priori estimation of the sample size, considering the absence of any trends in the differences and correlations, we can reasonably conclude that the baseline chest CT-scan does not predict a gas-exchange response in awake prone-positioned patients with COVID-19 related ARDS. Physicians dealing with this category of patients should not rely on the imaging at presentation when evaluating whether to pronate patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94065352022-08-26 Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS Raimondi, Federico Cazzaniga, Sara Annibali, Simona Novelli, Luca Brivio, Matteo Pappacena, Simone Malandrino, Luca Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Bianco, Ilaria Liggeri, Noemi Gritti, Paolo Lorini, Ferdinando Luca Sironi, Sandro Di Marco, Fabiano Diagnostics (Basel) Article Prone positioning is frequently used for non-intubated hypoxemic patients with COVID-19, although conclusive evidence is still lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether baseline CT-scans could predict the improvement in oxygenation in COVID-19 related Acute respira-tory syndrome (ARDS) patients when pronated. Methods: A retrospective study of COVID-19 patients who underwent non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and prone positioning was conducted. Results: Forty-five patients were included. On average, 50% of the overall lung volume was affected by the disease, as observed in the CT-scans, with ground glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidations accounting for 44% and 4%, respectively. The abnormalities were mainly posterior, as demonstrated by posterior/anterior distribution ratios of 1.5 and 4.4 for GGO and consolidation, respectively. The median PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio during NIV in a supine position (SP1) was 140 [IQR 108–169], which improved by 67% (+98) during prone positioning, on average. Once supine positioning was resumed (SP2), the improvement in oxygenation was maintained in 28 patients (62% of the overall population, categorized as “responders”). We found no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of the extent (p = 0.92) and the distribution of parenchymal abnormalities seen in the baseline CT (p = 0.526). Conclusion: Despite the lack of a priori estimation of the sample size, considering the absence of any trends in the differences and correlations, we can reasonably conclude that the baseline chest CT-scan does not predict a gas-exchange response in awake prone-positioned patients with COVID-19 related ARDS. Physicians dealing with this category of patients should not rely on the imaging at presentation when evaluating whether to pronate patients. MDPI 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9406535/ /pubmed/36010199 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081848 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Raimondi, Federico
Cazzaniga, Sara
Annibali, Simona
Novelli, Luca
Brivio, Matteo
Pappacena, Simone
Malandrino, Luca
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Bianco, Ilaria
Liggeri, Noemi
Gritti, Paolo
Lorini, Ferdinando Luca
Sironi, Sandro
Di Marco, Fabiano
Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
title Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
title_full Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
title_fullStr Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
title_full_unstemmed Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
title_short Extent and Distribution of Parenchymal Abnormalities in Baseline CT-Scans Do Not Predict Awake Prone Positioning Response in COVID-19 Related ARDS
title_sort extent and distribution of parenchymal abnormalities in baseline ct-scans do not predict awake prone positioning response in covid-19 related ards
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010199
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081848
work_keys_str_mv AT raimondifederico extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT cazzanigasara extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT annibalisimona extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT novelliluca extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT briviomatteo extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT pappacenasimone extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT malandrinoluca extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT bonaffinipietroandrea extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT biancoilaria extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT liggerinoemi extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT grittipaolo extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT loriniferdinandoluca extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT sironisandro extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards
AT dimarcofabiano extentanddistributionofparenchymalabnormalitiesinbaselinectscansdonotpredictawakepronepositioningresponseincovid19relatedards