Cargando…
Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081820 |
_version_ | 1784774172185985024 |
---|---|
author | Song, Kwang-Soon Yon, Chang-Jin Heo, Yu-Ran Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, Seung-Bo Ko, Yeon-Kyoung Lee, Kyung-Jae Lee, Si-Wook |
author_facet | Song, Kwang-Soon Yon, Chang-Jin Heo, Yu-Ran Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, Seung-Bo Ko, Yeon-Kyoung Lee, Kyung-Jae Lee, Si-Wook |
author_sort | Song, Kwang-Soon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater trochanter (H-G). Six reference lines (A/B in transverse section; C, axial oblique section; D/E, conventional 3D reconstruction; and M, volumetric 3D reconstruction) from CT scans were used. The posterior condylar line was used as a distal femoral reference. As measured with the H-N and H-G lines, the anteversion means were 10.43° and 19.50°, respectively. Gross anteversion measured with the H-G line had less interobserver bias (ICC; H-N = 0.956, H-G = 0.982). The 2D transverse and volumetric 3D CT sections’ B/M lines were consistent with the H-N line (p: B = 0.925, M = 0.122) and the 2D axial oblique section’s C line was consistent with the H-G line (p < 0.1). The D/E lines differed significantly from the actual gross images (p < 0.05). Among several CT scan femoral anteversion measurement methods, the novel anteversion angle measurement method using CT scans’ axial oblique section was approximated with actual gross femoral anteversion angle from the femoral head to the greater trochanter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94066482022-08-26 Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study Song, Kwang-Soon Yon, Chang-Jin Heo, Yu-Ran Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, Seung-Bo Ko, Yeon-Kyoung Lee, Kyung-Jae Lee, Si-Wook Diagnostics (Basel) Article Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater trochanter (H-G). Six reference lines (A/B in transverse section; C, axial oblique section; D/E, conventional 3D reconstruction; and M, volumetric 3D reconstruction) from CT scans were used. The posterior condylar line was used as a distal femoral reference. As measured with the H-N and H-G lines, the anteversion means were 10.43° and 19.50°, respectively. Gross anteversion measured with the H-G line had less interobserver bias (ICC; H-N = 0.956, H-G = 0.982). The 2D transverse and volumetric 3D CT sections’ B/M lines were consistent with the H-N line (p: B = 0.925, M = 0.122) and the 2D axial oblique section’s C line was consistent with the H-G line (p < 0.1). The D/E lines differed significantly from the actual gross images (p < 0.05). Among several CT scan femoral anteversion measurement methods, the novel anteversion angle measurement method using CT scans’ axial oblique section was approximated with actual gross femoral anteversion angle from the femoral head to the greater trochanter. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9406648/ /pubmed/36010171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081820 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Song, Kwang-Soon Yon, Chang-Jin Heo, Yu-Ran Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, Seung-Bo Ko, Yeon-Kyoung Lee, Kyung-Jae Lee, Si-Wook Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study |
title | Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study |
title_full | Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study |
title_fullStr | Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study |
title_short | Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study |
title_sort | using the axial oblique view of computed tomography (ct) in evaluating femoral anteversion: a comparative cadaveric study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081820 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songkwangsoon usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT yonchangjin usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT heoyuran usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT leejaeho usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT leeseungbo usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT koyeonkyoung usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT leekyungjae usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy AT leesiwook usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy |