Cargando…

Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study

Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Kwang-Soon, Yon, Chang-Jin, Heo, Yu-Ran, Lee, Jae-Ho, Lee, Seung-Bo, Ko, Yeon-Kyoung, Lee, Kyung-Jae, Lee, Si-Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081820
_version_ 1784774172185985024
author Song, Kwang-Soon
Yon, Chang-Jin
Heo, Yu-Ran
Lee, Jae-Ho
Lee, Seung-Bo
Ko, Yeon-Kyoung
Lee, Kyung-Jae
Lee, Si-Wook
author_facet Song, Kwang-Soon
Yon, Chang-Jin
Heo, Yu-Ran
Lee, Jae-Ho
Lee, Seung-Bo
Ko, Yeon-Kyoung
Lee, Kyung-Jae
Lee, Si-Wook
author_sort Song, Kwang-Soon
collection PubMed
description Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater trochanter (H-G). Six reference lines (A/B in transverse section; C, axial oblique section; D/E, conventional 3D reconstruction; and M, volumetric 3D reconstruction) from CT scans were used. The posterior condylar line was used as a distal femoral reference. As measured with the H-N and H-G lines, the anteversion means were 10.43° and 19.50°, respectively. Gross anteversion measured with the H-G line had less interobserver bias (ICC; H-N = 0.956, H-G = 0.982). The 2D transverse and volumetric 3D CT sections’ B/M lines were consistent with the H-N line (p: B = 0.925, M = 0.122) and the 2D axial oblique section’s C line was consistent with the H-G line (p < 0.1). The D/E lines differed significantly from the actual gross images (p < 0.05). Among several CT scan femoral anteversion measurement methods, the novel anteversion angle measurement method using CT scans’ axial oblique section was approximated with actual gross femoral anteversion angle from the femoral head to the greater trochanter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94066482022-08-26 Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study Song, Kwang-Soon Yon, Chang-Jin Heo, Yu-Ran Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, Seung-Bo Ko, Yeon-Kyoung Lee, Kyung-Jae Lee, Si-Wook Diagnostics (Basel) Article Twenty-five cadaveric adult femora’s anteversion angles were measured to develop a highly efficient and reproducible femoral anteversion measurement method using computed tomography (CT). Digital photography captured the proximal femur’s two reference lines, head-to-neck (H-N) and head-to-greater trochanter (H-G). Six reference lines (A/B in transverse section; C, axial oblique section; D/E, conventional 3D reconstruction; and M, volumetric 3D reconstruction) from CT scans were used. The posterior condylar line was used as a distal femoral reference. As measured with the H-N and H-G lines, the anteversion means were 10.43° and 19.50°, respectively. Gross anteversion measured with the H-G line had less interobserver bias (ICC; H-N = 0.956, H-G = 0.982). The 2D transverse and volumetric 3D CT sections’ B/M lines were consistent with the H-N line (p: B = 0.925, M = 0.122) and the 2D axial oblique section’s C line was consistent with the H-G line (p < 0.1). The D/E lines differed significantly from the actual gross images (p < 0.05). Among several CT scan femoral anteversion measurement methods, the novel anteversion angle measurement method using CT scans’ axial oblique section was approximated with actual gross femoral anteversion angle from the femoral head to the greater trochanter. MDPI 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9406648/ /pubmed/36010171 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081820 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Song, Kwang-Soon
Yon, Chang-Jin
Heo, Yu-Ran
Lee, Jae-Ho
Lee, Seung-Bo
Ko, Yeon-Kyoung
Lee, Kyung-Jae
Lee, Si-Wook
Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
title Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
title_full Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
title_fullStr Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
title_full_unstemmed Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
title_short Using the Axial Oblique View of Computed Tomography (CT) in Evaluating Femoral Anteversion: A Comparative Cadaveric Study
title_sort using the axial oblique view of computed tomography (ct) in evaluating femoral anteversion: a comparative cadaveric study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010171
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081820
work_keys_str_mv AT songkwangsoon usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT yonchangjin usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT heoyuran usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT leejaeho usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT leeseungbo usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT koyeonkyoung usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT leekyungjae usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy
AT leesiwook usingtheaxialobliqueviewofcomputedtomographyctinevaluatingfemoralanteversionacomparativecadavericstudy