Cargando…

Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: As the superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for painful non-spine bone metastases remains controversial, we conducted propensity score-matched analysis. Our results showed that the 3-month pain response rate after S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Kei, Taguchi, Kentaro, Nakajima, Yujiro, Ogawa, Hiroaki, Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164014
_version_ 1784774200007852032
author Ito, Kei
Taguchi, Kentaro
Nakajima, Yujiro
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
author_facet Ito, Kei
Taguchi, Kentaro
Nakajima, Yujiro
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
author_sort Ito, Kei
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: As the superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for painful non-spine bone metastases remains controversial, we conducted propensity score-matched analysis. Our results showed that the 3-month pain response rate after SBRT was significantly higher than that after cEBRT. Therefore, these findings suggest that large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare SBRT with cEBRT for painful bone metastases not involving the spine. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: The superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) in terms of pain palliation for bone metastases remains controversial. (2) Methods: This propensity score-matched study compared the overall pain response (OR) 3 months after radiotherapy among patients with painful (≥2 points on a 0-to-10 scale) non-spine bone metastases. Patients with lesions that were treated with SBRT or cEBRT and whose pain scores were evaluated 3 months after radiotherapy were included in this study. Pain response was evaluated according to the International Consensus Criteria. (3) Results: A total of 234 lesions (SBRT, n = 129; cEBRT, n = 105) were identified in our institutional database. To reduce the confounding effects, 162 patients were selected using a propensity score-matched analysis (n = 81 for each treatment). The OR rate at 3 months after SBRT was significantly higher than that after cEBRT (76.5% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.012). A noteworthy finding of our study is that the same trend was observed even after 6 months (75.9% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.011). The 1-year local failure rates after SBRT and cEBRT were 10.2% and 33.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SBRT is superior to cEBRT for pain palliation in patients with non-spine bone metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94067612022-08-26 Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Ito, Kei Taguchi, Kentaro Nakajima, Yujiro Ogawa, Hiroaki Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: As the superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for painful non-spine bone metastases remains controversial, we conducted propensity score-matched analysis. Our results showed that the 3-month pain response rate after SBRT was significantly higher than that after cEBRT. Therefore, these findings suggest that large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare SBRT with cEBRT for painful bone metastases not involving the spine. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: The superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) in terms of pain palliation for bone metastases remains controversial. (2) Methods: This propensity score-matched study compared the overall pain response (OR) 3 months after radiotherapy among patients with painful (≥2 points on a 0-to-10 scale) non-spine bone metastases. Patients with lesions that were treated with SBRT or cEBRT and whose pain scores were evaluated 3 months after radiotherapy were included in this study. Pain response was evaluated according to the International Consensus Criteria. (3) Results: A total of 234 lesions (SBRT, n = 129; cEBRT, n = 105) were identified in our institutional database. To reduce the confounding effects, 162 patients were selected using a propensity score-matched analysis (n = 81 for each treatment). The OR rate at 3 months after SBRT was significantly higher than that after cEBRT (76.5% vs. 56.8%; p = 0.012). A noteworthy finding of our study is that the same trend was observed even after 6 months (75.9% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.011). The 1-year local failure rates after SBRT and cEBRT were 10.2% and 33.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SBRT is superior to cEBRT for pain palliation in patients with non-spine bone metastases. MDPI 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9406761/ /pubmed/36011008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164014 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ito, Kei
Taguchi, Kentaro
Nakajima, Yujiro
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_full Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_fullStr Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_short Palliative Efficacy of High-Dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_sort palliative efficacy of high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for painful non-spine bone metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164014
work_keys_str_mv AT itokei palliativeefficacyofhighdosestereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyforpainfulnonspinebonemetastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT taguchikentaro palliativeefficacyofhighdosestereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyforpainfulnonspinebonemetastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT nakajimayujiro palliativeefficacyofhighdosestereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyforpainfulnonspinebonemetastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT ogawahiroaki palliativeefficacyofhighdosestereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyforpainfulnonspinebonemetastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT murofushikeikonemoto palliativeefficacyofhighdosestereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalradiotherapyforpainfulnonspinebonemetastasesapropensityscorematchedanalysis