Cargando…

In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate human osteoblast (HOB) responses towards different degrees of titanium (Ti) implant surface roughness. Methods: Four degrees of Ti surface roughness were investigated on a micrometer roughness scale: smooth (S: 0.08–0.1 µm), minimally rough (MM: 0.3–0.5 µm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osman, Muataz A., Alamoush, Rasha A., Kushnerev, Evgeny, Seymour, Kevin G., Shawcross, Susan, Yates, Julian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080140
_version_ 1784774201217908736
author Osman, Muataz A.
Alamoush, Rasha A.
Kushnerev, Evgeny
Seymour, Kevin G.
Shawcross, Susan
Yates, Julian M.
author_facet Osman, Muataz A.
Alamoush, Rasha A.
Kushnerev, Evgeny
Seymour, Kevin G.
Shawcross, Susan
Yates, Julian M.
author_sort Osman, Muataz A.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: This study aimed to investigate human osteoblast (HOB) responses towards different degrees of titanium (Ti) implant surface roughness. Methods: Four degrees of Ti surface roughness were investigated on a micrometer roughness scale: smooth (S: 0.08–0.1 µm), minimally rough (MM: 0.3–0.5 µm), moderately rough (MR: 1.2–1.4 µm), and rough (R: 3.3–3.7 µm). HOB cells were cultured, expanded, and maintained according to the supplier’s protocol. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were assessed at day 1, 3, 5, and 10 using alamarBlue and lactate dehydrogenase colorimetric assays. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test (p = 0.05 for all tests). Results: There was no significant difference in the cell proliferation or cytotoxicity of the HOB cells in contact with the different degrees of Ti surface roughness. There was, however, a significant time effect on cell proliferation (p < 0.0001) with different exposure durations for each roughness degree. Furthermore, a positive correlation (non-significant) between proliferation and cytotoxicity was observed for all investigated degrees of surface roughness. Conclusion: All investigated roughness degrees showed comparable HOB proliferation, with the MR surface presenting the highest percentage, followed by the R, MM, ad S, surfaces, respectively. The S surface showed the highest cytotoxic effect on HOBs; however, it did not reach the cytotoxic level suggested by the ISO for any medical device to be considered cytotoxic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94067662022-08-26 In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness Osman, Muataz A. Alamoush, Rasha A. Kushnerev, Evgeny Seymour, Kevin G. Shawcross, Susan Yates, Julian M. Dent J (Basel) Article Objectives: This study aimed to investigate human osteoblast (HOB) responses towards different degrees of titanium (Ti) implant surface roughness. Methods: Four degrees of Ti surface roughness were investigated on a micrometer roughness scale: smooth (S: 0.08–0.1 µm), minimally rough (MM: 0.3–0.5 µm), moderately rough (MR: 1.2–1.4 µm), and rough (R: 3.3–3.7 µm). HOB cells were cultured, expanded, and maintained according to the supplier’s protocol. Cell proliferation and cytotoxicity were assessed at day 1, 3, 5, and 10 using alamarBlue and lactate dehydrogenase colorimetric assays. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test (p = 0.05 for all tests). Results: There was no significant difference in the cell proliferation or cytotoxicity of the HOB cells in contact with the different degrees of Ti surface roughness. There was, however, a significant time effect on cell proliferation (p < 0.0001) with different exposure durations for each roughness degree. Furthermore, a positive correlation (non-significant) between proliferation and cytotoxicity was observed for all investigated degrees of surface roughness. Conclusion: All investigated roughness degrees showed comparable HOB proliferation, with the MR surface presenting the highest percentage, followed by the R, MM, ad S, surfaces, respectively. The S surface showed the highest cytotoxic effect on HOBs; however, it did not reach the cytotoxic level suggested by the ISO for any medical device to be considered cytotoxic. MDPI 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9406766/ /pubmed/36005238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080140 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Osman, Muataz A.
Alamoush, Rasha A.
Kushnerev, Evgeny
Seymour, Kevin G.
Shawcross, Susan
Yates, Julian M.
In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness
title In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness
title_full In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness
title_fullStr In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness
title_full_unstemmed In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness
title_short In-Vitro Phenotypic Response of Human Osteoblasts to Different Degrees of Titanium Surface Roughness
title_sort in-vitro phenotypic response of human osteoblasts to different degrees of titanium surface roughness
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080140
work_keys_str_mv AT osmanmuataza invitrophenotypicresponseofhumanosteoblaststodifferentdegreesoftitaniumsurfaceroughness
AT alamoushrashaa invitrophenotypicresponseofhumanosteoblaststodifferentdegreesoftitaniumsurfaceroughness
AT kushnerevevgeny invitrophenotypicresponseofhumanosteoblaststodifferentdegreesoftitaniumsurfaceroughness
AT seymourkeving invitrophenotypicresponseofhumanosteoblaststodifferentdegreesoftitaniumsurfaceroughness
AT shawcrosssusan invitrophenotypicresponseofhumanosteoblaststodifferentdegreesoftitaniumsurfaceroughness
AT yatesjulianm invitrophenotypicresponseofhumanosteoblaststodifferentdegreesoftitaniumsurfaceroughness