Cargando…
A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
Background: PGT-based NGS revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine, becoming an integrated component within current assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Methods: We searched the literature published in the last half a decade in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowled...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911 |
_version_ | 1784774220282068992 |
---|---|
author | Doroftei, Bogdan Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru Anton, Nicoleta Armeanu, Theodora Ilea, Ciprian |
author_facet | Doroftei, Bogdan Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru Anton, Nicoleta Armeanu, Theodora Ilea, Ciprian |
author_sort | Doroftei, Bogdan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: PGT-based NGS revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine, becoming an integrated component within current assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Methods: We searched the literature published in the last half a decade in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 1388 articles were filtered, from which 60 met, initially, the eligibility criteria, but only 42 were included (≥100 patients/couples—62,465 patients and 6628 couples in total) in the present mini-review. In total, forty-two (70.0%) reported reproductive outcomes, while eighteen (30.0%) had distinct objectives. Furthermore, n = 1, 1.66% of the studies focused on PGT, n = 1, 1.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), n = 3, 5.0% on pre-implantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) and n = 55, 91.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Conclusions: PGT using NGS proved to be an excellent companion that folds within the current ascending tendency among couples that require specialty care. We strongly encourage future studies to provide a systematic overview expanded at a larger scale on the role of the PGT-NGS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94068432022-08-26 A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach Doroftei, Bogdan Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru Anton, Nicoleta Armeanu, Theodora Ilea, Ciprian Diagnostics (Basel) Review Background: PGT-based NGS revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine, becoming an integrated component within current assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Methods: We searched the literature published in the last half a decade in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 1388 articles were filtered, from which 60 met, initially, the eligibility criteria, but only 42 were included (≥100 patients/couples—62,465 patients and 6628 couples in total) in the present mini-review. In total, forty-two (70.0%) reported reproductive outcomes, while eighteen (30.0%) had distinct objectives. Furthermore, n = 1, 1.66% of the studies focused on PGT, n = 1, 1.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), n = 3, 5.0% on pre-implantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) and n = 55, 91.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Conclusions: PGT using NGS proved to be an excellent companion that folds within the current ascending tendency among couples that require specialty care. We strongly encourage future studies to provide a systematic overview expanded at a larger scale on the role of the PGT-NGS. MDPI 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9406843/ /pubmed/36010262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Doroftei, Bogdan Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru Anton, Nicoleta Armeanu, Theodora Ilea, Ciprian A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach |
title | A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach |
title_full | A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach |
title_fullStr | A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach |
title_short | A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach |
title_sort | mini-review regarding the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization (ivf) following pre-implantation genetic testing (pgt)-next generation sequencing (ngs) approach |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dorofteibogdan aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT ilieovidiudumitru aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT antonnicoleta aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT armeanutheodora aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT ileaciprian aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT dorofteibogdan minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT ilieovidiudumitru minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT antonnicoleta minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT armeanutheodora minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach AT ileaciprian minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach |