Cargando…

A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach

Background: PGT-based NGS revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine, becoming an integrated component within current assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Methods: We searched the literature published in the last half a decade in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doroftei, Bogdan, Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru, Anton, Nicoleta, Armeanu, Theodora, Ilea, Ciprian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911
_version_ 1784774220282068992
author Doroftei, Bogdan
Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru
Anton, Nicoleta
Armeanu, Theodora
Ilea, Ciprian
author_facet Doroftei, Bogdan
Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru
Anton, Nicoleta
Armeanu, Theodora
Ilea, Ciprian
author_sort Doroftei, Bogdan
collection PubMed
description Background: PGT-based NGS revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine, becoming an integrated component within current assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Methods: We searched the literature published in the last half a decade in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 1388 articles were filtered, from which 60 met, initially, the eligibility criteria, but only 42 were included (≥100 patients/couples—62,465 patients and 6628 couples in total) in the present mini-review. In total, forty-two (70.0%) reported reproductive outcomes, while eighteen (30.0%) had distinct objectives. Furthermore, n = 1, 1.66% of the studies focused on PGT, n = 1, 1.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), n = 3, 5.0% on pre-implantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) and n = 55, 91.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Conclusions: PGT using NGS proved to be an excellent companion that folds within the current ascending tendency among couples that require specialty care. We strongly encourage future studies to provide a systematic overview expanded at a larger scale on the role of the PGT-NGS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94068432022-08-26 A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach Doroftei, Bogdan Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru Anton, Nicoleta Armeanu, Theodora Ilea, Ciprian Diagnostics (Basel) Review Background: PGT-based NGS revolutionized the field of reproductive medicine, becoming an integrated component within current assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols. Methods: We searched the literature published in the last half a decade in four databases (PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) between 2018 and 2022. Results: A total of 1388 articles were filtered, from which 60 met, initially, the eligibility criteria, but only 42 were included (≥100 patients/couples—62,465 patients and 6628 couples in total) in the present mini-review. In total, forty-two (70.0%) reported reproductive outcomes, while eighteen (30.0%) had distinct objectives. Furthermore, n = 1, 1.66% of the studies focused on PGT, n = 1, 1.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), n = 3, 5.0% on pre-implantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) and n = 55, 91.66% on pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Conclusions: PGT using NGS proved to be an excellent companion that folds within the current ascending tendency among couples that require specialty care. We strongly encourage future studies to provide a systematic overview expanded at a larger scale on the role of the PGT-NGS. MDPI 2022-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9406843/ /pubmed/36010262 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Doroftei, Bogdan
Ilie, Ovidiu-Dumitru
Anton, Nicoleta
Armeanu, Theodora
Ilea, Ciprian
A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
title A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
title_full A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
title_fullStr A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
title_full_unstemmed A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
title_short A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach
title_sort mini-review regarding the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization (ivf) following pre-implantation genetic testing (pgt)-next generation sequencing (ngs) approach
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010262
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911
work_keys_str_mv AT dorofteibogdan aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT ilieovidiudumitru aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT antonnicoleta aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT armeanutheodora aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT ileaciprian aminireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT dorofteibogdan minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT ilieovidiudumitru minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT antonnicoleta minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT armeanutheodora minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach
AT ileaciprian minireviewregardingtheclinicaloutcomesofinvitrofertilizationivffollowingpreimplantationgenetictestingpgtnextgenerationsequencingngsapproach