Cargando…
Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
Background: Fixed retainers assist in maintaining the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. Fixed retention may be affected by bruxism. Objective: Evaluate two adhesives (an ormocer and a flowable composite) used for fixed orthodontic retention in simulated bruxism settings, compared to regular mastica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080141 |
_version_ | 1784774224728031232 |
---|---|
author | Labuneț, Anca Objelean, Adriana Almășan, Oana Kui, Andreea Buduru, Smaranda Sava, Sorina |
author_facet | Labuneț, Anca Objelean, Adriana Almășan, Oana Kui, Andreea Buduru, Smaranda Sava, Sorina |
author_sort | Labuneț, Anca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Fixed retainers assist in maintaining the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. Fixed retention may be affected by bruxism. Objective: Evaluate two adhesives (an ormocer and a flowable composite) used for fixed orthodontic retention in simulated bruxism settings, compared to regular mastication, using a dual axis chewing simulator. Methods: Eighty human teeth were used. Periodontal tissues were simulated and exposed to 120,000 mechanical cycles, corresponding to 6 months of clinical service. Each set of two teeth was supplied with a pre-shaped, fixed, multi-braided, stainless steel wire retainer, in 1.5 cm portions, to establish passive contact with the lingual surface of the teeth. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to evaluate the shear bond strength. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the micro-infiltration. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean value of micro-infiltration between adhesives in the mastication group but in the bruxism group. During testing, one composite sample (ARI score 1) was broken in the mastication group, while three ormocer samples (ARI score 2) and one composite sample (ARI score 1) were broken in the bruxism group. Conclusions: The mean value for micro-infiltration in composite (0.31) was more than double that in ormocer (0.13). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9406861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94068612022-08-26 Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion Labuneț, Anca Objelean, Adriana Almășan, Oana Kui, Andreea Buduru, Smaranda Sava, Sorina Dent J (Basel) Article Background: Fixed retainers assist in maintaining the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. Fixed retention may be affected by bruxism. Objective: Evaluate two adhesives (an ormocer and a flowable composite) used for fixed orthodontic retention in simulated bruxism settings, compared to regular mastication, using a dual axis chewing simulator. Methods: Eighty human teeth were used. Periodontal tissues were simulated and exposed to 120,000 mechanical cycles, corresponding to 6 months of clinical service. Each set of two teeth was supplied with a pre-shaped, fixed, multi-braided, stainless steel wire retainer, in 1.5 cm portions, to establish passive contact with the lingual surface of the teeth. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to evaluate the shear bond strength. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the micro-infiltration. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean value of micro-infiltration between adhesives in the mastication group but in the bruxism group. During testing, one composite sample (ARI score 1) was broken in the mastication group, while three ormocer samples (ARI score 2) and one composite sample (ARI score 1) were broken in the bruxism group. Conclusions: The mean value for micro-infiltration in composite (0.31) was more than double that in ormocer (0.13). MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9406861/ /pubmed/36005239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080141 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Labuneț, Anca Objelean, Adriana Almășan, Oana Kui, Andreea Buduru, Smaranda Sava, Sorina Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion |
title | Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion |
title_full | Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion |
title_fullStr | Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion |
title_full_unstemmed | Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion |
title_short | Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion |
title_sort | bruxism’s implications on fixed orthodontic retainer adhesion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labunetanca bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion AT objeleanadriana bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion AT almasanoana bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion AT kuiandreea bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion AT budurusmaranda bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion AT savasorina bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion |