Cargando…

Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion

Background: Fixed retainers assist in maintaining the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. Fixed retention may be affected by bruxism. Objective: Evaluate two adhesives (an ormocer and a flowable composite) used for fixed orthodontic retention in simulated bruxism settings, compared to regular mastica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labuneț, Anca, Objelean, Adriana, Almășan, Oana, Kui, Andreea, Buduru, Smaranda, Sava, Sorina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080141
_version_ 1784774224728031232
author Labuneț, Anca
Objelean, Adriana
Almășan, Oana
Kui, Andreea
Buduru, Smaranda
Sava, Sorina
author_facet Labuneț, Anca
Objelean, Adriana
Almășan, Oana
Kui, Andreea
Buduru, Smaranda
Sava, Sorina
author_sort Labuneț, Anca
collection PubMed
description Background: Fixed retainers assist in maintaining the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. Fixed retention may be affected by bruxism. Objective: Evaluate two adhesives (an ormocer and a flowable composite) used for fixed orthodontic retention in simulated bruxism settings, compared to regular mastication, using a dual axis chewing simulator. Methods: Eighty human teeth were used. Periodontal tissues were simulated and exposed to 120,000 mechanical cycles, corresponding to 6 months of clinical service. Each set of two teeth was supplied with a pre-shaped, fixed, multi-braided, stainless steel wire retainer, in 1.5 cm portions, to establish passive contact with the lingual surface of the teeth. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to evaluate the shear bond strength. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the micro-infiltration. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean value of micro-infiltration between adhesives in the mastication group but in the bruxism group. During testing, one composite sample (ARI score 1) was broken in the mastication group, while three ormocer samples (ARI score 2) and one composite sample (ARI score 1) were broken in the bruxism group. Conclusions: The mean value for micro-infiltration in composite (0.31) was more than double that in ormocer (0.13).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94068612022-08-26 Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion Labuneț, Anca Objelean, Adriana Almășan, Oana Kui, Andreea Buduru, Smaranda Sava, Sorina Dent J (Basel) Article Background: Fixed retainers assist in maintaining the outcomes of orthodontic treatment. Fixed retention may be affected by bruxism. Objective: Evaluate two adhesives (an ormocer and a flowable composite) used for fixed orthodontic retention in simulated bruxism settings, compared to regular mastication, using a dual axis chewing simulator. Methods: Eighty human teeth were used. Periodontal tissues were simulated and exposed to 120,000 mechanical cycles, corresponding to 6 months of clinical service. Each set of two teeth was supplied with a pre-shaped, fixed, multi-braided, stainless steel wire retainer, in 1.5 cm portions, to establish passive contact with the lingual surface of the teeth. The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was used to evaluate the shear bond strength. A stereomicroscope was used to assess the micro-infiltration. Results: There was no significant difference in the mean value of micro-infiltration between adhesives in the mastication group but in the bruxism group. During testing, one composite sample (ARI score 1) was broken in the mastication group, while three ormocer samples (ARI score 2) and one composite sample (ARI score 1) were broken in the bruxism group. Conclusions: The mean value for micro-infiltration in composite (0.31) was more than double that in ormocer (0.13). MDPI 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9406861/ /pubmed/36005239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080141 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Labuneț, Anca
Objelean, Adriana
Almășan, Oana
Kui, Andreea
Buduru, Smaranda
Sava, Sorina
Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
title Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
title_full Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
title_fullStr Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
title_full_unstemmed Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
title_short Bruxism’s Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion
title_sort bruxism’s implications on fixed orthodontic retainer adhesion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10080141
work_keys_str_mv AT labunetanca bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion
AT objeleanadriana bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion
AT almasanoana bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion
AT kuiandreea bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion
AT budurusmaranda bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion
AT savasorina bruxismsimplicationsonfixedorthodonticretaineradhesion