Cargando…

Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China

Background: We designed and validated the value of multiple radiomics models for diagnosing histological grade of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), holding a promise of assisting in precision medicine and providing clinical therapeutic strategies. Methods: 198 PDAC patients receiving surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Hongfan, Li, Yongmei, Yang, Yaying, Liu, Huan, Zhang, Jiao, Liang, Hongwei, Yan, Gaowu, Liu, Yanbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081915
_version_ 1784774237931700224
author Liao, Hongfan
Li, Yongmei
Yang, Yaying
Liu, Huan
Zhang, Jiao
Liang, Hongwei
Yan, Gaowu
Liu, Yanbing
author_facet Liao, Hongfan
Li, Yongmei
Yang, Yaying
Liu, Huan
Zhang, Jiao
Liang, Hongwei
Yan, Gaowu
Liu, Yanbing
author_sort Liao, Hongfan
collection PubMed
description Background: We designed and validated the value of multiple radiomics models for diagnosing histological grade of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), holding a promise of assisting in precision medicine and providing clinical therapeutic strategies. Methods: 198 PDAC patients receiving surgical resection and pathological confirmation were enrolled and classified as 117 low-grade PDAC and 81 high-grade PDAC group. An external validation group was used to assess models’ performance. Available radiomics features were selected using GBDT algorithm on the basis of the arterial and venous phases, respectively. Five different machine learning models were built including k-nearest neighbour, logistic regression, naive bayes model, support vector machine, and random forest using ten times tenfold cross-validation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to establish clinical model and combined model. The models’ performance was assessed according to its predictive performance, calibration curves, and decision curves. A nomogram was established for visualization. Survival analysis was conducted for stratifying the overall survival prior to treatment. Results: In the training group, the RF model demonstrated the optimal predictive ability and robustness with an AUC of 0.943; the SVM model achieved the secondary performance, followed by Bayes model. In the external validation group, these three models (Bayes, RF, SVM) also achieved the top three predictive ability. A clinical model was built by selected clinical features with an AUC of 0.728, and combined model was established by an RF model and a clinical model with an AUC of 0.961. The log-rank test revealed that the low-grade group survived longer than the high-grade group. Conclusions: The multiphasic CECT radiomics models offered an accurate and noninvasive perspective to differentiate histological grade in PDAC and advantages of machine learning models including RF, SVM and Bayes were more remarkable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94069152022-08-26 Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China Liao, Hongfan Li, Yongmei Yang, Yaying Liu, Huan Zhang, Jiao Liang, Hongwei Yan, Gaowu Liu, Yanbing Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: We designed and validated the value of multiple radiomics models for diagnosing histological grade of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), holding a promise of assisting in precision medicine and providing clinical therapeutic strategies. Methods: 198 PDAC patients receiving surgical resection and pathological confirmation were enrolled and classified as 117 low-grade PDAC and 81 high-grade PDAC group. An external validation group was used to assess models’ performance. Available radiomics features were selected using GBDT algorithm on the basis of the arterial and venous phases, respectively. Five different machine learning models were built including k-nearest neighbour, logistic regression, naive bayes model, support vector machine, and random forest using ten times tenfold cross-validation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to establish clinical model and combined model. The models’ performance was assessed according to its predictive performance, calibration curves, and decision curves. A nomogram was established for visualization. Survival analysis was conducted for stratifying the overall survival prior to treatment. Results: In the training group, the RF model demonstrated the optimal predictive ability and robustness with an AUC of 0.943; the SVM model achieved the secondary performance, followed by Bayes model. In the external validation group, these three models (Bayes, RF, SVM) also achieved the top three predictive ability. A clinical model was built by selected clinical features with an AUC of 0.728, and combined model was established by an RF model and a clinical model with an AUC of 0.961. The log-rank test revealed that the low-grade group survived longer than the high-grade group. Conclusions: The multiphasic CECT radiomics models offered an accurate and noninvasive perspective to differentiate histological grade in PDAC and advantages of machine learning models including RF, SVM and Bayes were more remarkable. MDPI 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9406915/ /pubmed/36010267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081915 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liao, Hongfan
Li, Yongmei
Yang, Yaying
Liu, Huan
Zhang, Jiao
Liang, Hongwei
Yan, Gaowu
Liu, Yanbing
Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China
title Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China
title_full Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China
title_fullStr Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China
title_short Comparison of Multiple Radiomics Models for Identifying Histological Grade of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Preoperatively Based on Multiphasic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Two-Center Study in Southwest China
title_sort comparison of multiple radiomics models for identifying histological grade of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma preoperatively based on multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a two-center study in southwest china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081915
work_keys_str_mv AT liaohongfan comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT liyongmei comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT yangyaying comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT liuhuan comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT zhangjiao comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT lianghongwei comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT yangaowu comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina
AT liuyanbing comparisonofmultipleradiomicsmodelsforidentifyinghistologicalgradeofpancreaticductaladenocarcinomapreoperativelybasedonmultiphasiccontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyatwocenterstudyinsouthwestchina