Cargando…

Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database

Background: This study aims to evaluate the overall and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT) compared with mastectomy plus RT in resectable breast cancer. Moreover, the aim is to also identify the subgroups who benefit from BCS plus RT a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiang, Wenbin, Wu, Chaoyan, Wu, Huachao, Fang, Sha, Liu, Nuomin, Yu, Haijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080452
_version_ 1784774246318211072
author Xiang, Wenbin
Wu, Chaoyan
Wu, Huachao
Fang, Sha
Liu, Nuomin
Yu, Haijun
author_facet Xiang, Wenbin
Wu, Chaoyan
Wu, Huachao
Fang, Sha
Liu, Nuomin
Yu, Haijun
author_sort Xiang, Wenbin
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aims to evaluate the overall and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT) compared with mastectomy plus RT in resectable breast cancer. Moreover, the aim is to also identify the subgroups who benefit from BCS plus RT and establish a predictive nomogram for stage II patients. Methods: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1990 and 2016. Patients with available clinical information were split into two groups: BCS plus RT and mastectomy plus RT. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariate regression analysis, and propensity score matching were used in the study. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated based on stratified Cox univariate regression analyses. A prognostic nomogram by multivariable Cox regression model was developed for stage II patients, and consistency index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram in the training and validation set. Results: A total of 24,590 eligible patients were enrolled. The difference in overall survival (OS) and BCSS remained significant in stage II patients both before and after PSM (after PSM: OS: HR = 0.8536, p = 0.0115; BCSS: HR = 0.7803, p = 0.0013). In stage II patients, the survival advantage effect of BCS plus RT on OS and BCSS was observed in the following subgroups: any age, smaller tumor size (<1 cm), stage IIA (T2N0, T0–1N1), ER (+), and any PR status. Secondly, the C-indexes for BCSS prediction was 0.714 (95% CI 0.694–0.734). The calibration curves showed perfect agreement in both the training and validation sets. Conclusions: BCS plus RT significantly improved the survival rates for patients of stage IIA (T2N0, T0–1N1), ER (+). For stage II patients, the nomogram was a good predictor of 5-, 10-, and 15-year BCSS. Our study may help guide treatment decisions and prolong the survival of stage II breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9406949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94069492022-08-26 Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database Xiang, Wenbin Wu, Chaoyan Wu, Huachao Fang, Sha Liu, Nuomin Yu, Haijun Curr Oncol Article Background: This study aims to evaluate the overall and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy (RT) compared with mastectomy plus RT in resectable breast cancer. Moreover, the aim is to also identify the subgroups who benefit from BCS plus RT and establish a predictive nomogram for stage II patients. Methods: Stage I–III breast cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1990 and 2016. Patients with available clinical information were split into two groups: BCS plus RT and mastectomy plus RT. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariate regression analysis, and propensity score matching were used in the study. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated based on stratified Cox univariate regression analyses. A prognostic nomogram by multivariable Cox regression model was developed for stage II patients, and consistency index (C-index) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram in the training and validation set. Results: A total of 24,590 eligible patients were enrolled. The difference in overall survival (OS) and BCSS remained significant in stage II patients both before and after PSM (after PSM: OS: HR = 0.8536, p = 0.0115; BCSS: HR = 0.7803, p = 0.0013). In stage II patients, the survival advantage effect of BCS plus RT on OS and BCSS was observed in the following subgroups: any age, smaller tumor size (<1 cm), stage IIA (T2N0, T0–1N1), ER (+), and any PR status. Secondly, the C-indexes for BCSS prediction was 0.714 (95% CI 0.694–0.734). The calibration curves showed perfect agreement in both the training and validation sets. Conclusions: BCS plus RT significantly improved the survival rates for patients of stage IIA (T2N0, T0–1N1), ER (+). For stage II patients, the nomogram was a good predictor of 5-, 10-, and 15-year BCSS. Our study may help guide treatment decisions and prolong the survival of stage II breast cancer patients. MDPI 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9406949/ /pubmed/36005190 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080452 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Xiang, Wenbin
Wu, Chaoyan
Wu, Huachao
Fang, Sha
Liu, Nuomin
Yu, Haijun
Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database
title Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database
title_full Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database
title_fullStr Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database
title_full_unstemmed Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database
title_short Survival Comparisons between Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Followed by Postoperative Radiotherapy in Stage I–III Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (Seer) Program Database
title_sort survival comparisons between breast conservation surgery and mastectomy followed by postoperative radiotherapy in stage i–iii breast cancer patients: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (seer) program database
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9406949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005190
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29080452
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangwenbin survivalcomparisonsbetweenbreastconservationsurgeryandmastectomyfollowedbypostoperativeradiotherapyinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsanalysisofthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerprogramdatabase
AT wuchaoyan survivalcomparisonsbetweenbreastconservationsurgeryandmastectomyfollowedbypostoperativeradiotherapyinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsanalysisofthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerprogramdatabase
AT wuhuachao survivalcomparisonsbetweenbreastconservationsurgeryandmastectomyfollowedbypostoperativeradiotherapyinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsanalysisofthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerprogramdatabase
AT fangsha survivalcomparisonsbetweenbreastconservationsurgeryandmastectomyfollowedbypostoperativeradiotherapyinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsanalysisofthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerprogramdatabase
AT liunuomin survivalcomparisonsbetweenbreastconservationsurgeryandmastectomyfollowedbypostoperativeradiotherapyinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsanalysisofthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerprogramdatabase
AT yuhaijun survivalcomparisonsbetweenbreastconservationsurgeryandmastectomyfollowedbypostoperativeradiotherapyinstageiiiibreastcancerpatientsanalysisofthesurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerprogramdatabase