Cargando…
Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT
(1) Background: Optimal anatomic coverage is important for radiation-dose optimization. We trained and tested (R2.2.4) two (R3-2) deep learning (DL) algorithms on a machine vision tool library platform (Cognex Vision Pro Deep Learning software) to recognize anatomic landmarks and classify chest CT a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081844 |
_version_ | 1784774258979766272 |
---|---|
author | Kaviani, Parisa Bizzo, Bernardo C. Digumarthy, Subba R. Dasegowda, Giridhar Karout, Lina Hillis, James Neumark, Nir Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dreyer, Keith J. |
author_facet | Kaviani, Parisa Bizzo, Bernardo C. Digumarthy, Subba R. Dasegowda, Giridhar Karout, Lina Hillis, James Neumark, Nir Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dreyer, Keith J. |
author_sort | Kaviani, Parisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Optimal anatomic coverage is important for radiation-dose optimization. We trained and tested (R2.2.4) two (R3-2) deep learning (DL) algorithms on a machine vision tool library platform (Cognex Vision Pro Deep Learning software) to recognize anatomic landmarks and classify chest CT as those with optimum, under-scanned, or over-scanned scan length. (2) Methods: To test our hypothesis, we performed a study with 428 consecutive chest CT examinations (mean age 70 ± 14 years; male:female 190:238) performed at one of the four hospitals. CT examinations from two hospitals were used to train the DL classification algorithms to identify lung apices and bases. The developed algorithms were then tested on the data from the remaining two hospitals. For each CT, we recorded the scan lengths above and below the lung apices and bases. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. (3) Results: The two DL models for lung apex and bases had high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and areas under the curve (AUC) for identifying under-scanning (100%, 99%, 99%, and 0.999 (95% CI 0.996–1.000)) and over-scanning (99%, 99%, 99%, and 0.998 (95%CI 0.992–1.000)). (4) Conclusions: Our DL models can accurately identify markers for missing anatomic coverage and over-scanning in chest CTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9407000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94070002022-08-26 Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT Kaviani, Parisa Bizzo, Bernardo C. Digumarthy, Subba R. Dasegowda, Giridhar Karout, Lina Hillis, James Neumark, Nir Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dreyer, Keith J. Diagnostics (Basel) Article (1) Background: Optimal anatomic coverage is important for radiation-dose optimization. We trained and tested (R2.2.4) two (R3-2) deep learning (DL) algorithms on a machine vision tool library platform (Cognex Vision Pro Deep Learning software) to recognize anatomic landmarks and classify chest CT as those with optimum, under-scanned, or over-scanned scan length. (2) Methods: To test our hypothesis, we performed a study with 428 consecutive chest CT examinations (mean age 70 ± 14 years; male:female 190:238) performed at one of the four hospitals. CT examinations from two hospitals were used to train the DL classification algorithms to identify lung apices and bases. The developed algorithms were then tested on the data from the remaining two hospitals. For each CT, we recorded the scan lengths above and below the lung apices and bases. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. (3) Results: The two DL models for lung apex and bases had high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and areas under the curve (AUC) for identifying under-scanning (100%, 99%, 99%, and 0.999 (95% CI 0.996–1.000)) and over-scanning (99%, 99%, 99%, and 0.998 (95%CI 0.992–1.000)). (4) Conclusions: Our DL models can accurately identify markers for missing anatomic coverage and over-scanning in chest CTs. MDPI 2022-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9407000/ /pubmed/36010194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081844 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kaviani, Parisa Bizzo, Bernardo C. Digumarthy, Subba R. Dasegowda, Giridhar Karout, Lina Hillis, James Neumark, Nir Kalra, Mannudeep K. Dreyer, Keith J. Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT |
title | Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT |
title_full | Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT |
title_fullStr | Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT |
title_short | Radiologist-Trained and -Tested (R2.2.4) Deep Learning Models for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks in Chest CT |
title_sort | radiologist-trained and -tested (r2.2.4) deep learning models for identifying anatomical landmarks in chest ct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kavianiparisa radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT bizzobernardoc radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT digumarthysubbar radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT dasegowdagiridhar radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT karoutlina radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT hillisjames radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT neumarknir radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT kalramannudeepk radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct AT dreyerkeithj radiologisttrainedandtestedr224deeplearningmodelsforidentifyinganatomicallandmarksinchestct |