Cargando…

Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare radiographic outcomes and complication rates of immobilization with an abduction pillow to spica casting for postoperative care after a hip reconstruction with varus derotational proximal femur osteotomy (VDRO) with or without pelvic osteotomy for children with ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasconcellos, Alexander L., Tagawa, Alex S., Rhodes, Jason T., Silveira, Lori J., Skinner, Austin A., Frumberg, David B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034398
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863287
_version_ 1784774265339379712
author Vasconcellos, Alexander L.
Tagawa, Alex S.
Rhodes, Jason T.
Silveira, Lori J.
Skinner, Austin A.
Frumberg, David B.
author_facet Vasconcellos, Alexander L.
Tagawa, Alex S.
Rhodes, Jason T.
Silveira, Lori J.
Skinner, Austin A.
Frumberg, David B.
author_sort Vasconcellos, Alexander L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aims to compare radiographic outcomes and complication rates of immobilization with an abduction pillow to spica casting for postoperative care after a hip reconstruction with varus derotational proximal femur osteotomy (VDRO) with or without pelvic osteotomy for children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: 233 children (1–18 years old) diagnosed with CP that underwent VDRO with or without pelvic osteotomy were identified, of which 188 patients were immobilized with a spica cast and 45 were immobilized with an abduction pillow, based on surgeon preference. 123 (65%) in the Spica group and 21 (47%) in the pillow group had pelvic osteotomies. Demographic data and complication rates were collected. Radiographic parameters, including anatomic medial proximal femoral angle (aMPFA), acetabular index (AI) and migration percentage (MP), were measured for each patient at the completion of surgery, six weeks post-operatively, and one year post-operatively. RESULTS: There was not a statistically significant difference in BMI (p = 0.285), gender distribution (p = 0.984), or median follow-up time (p = 0.314) between groups. Rates of complications were consistent among groups with no differences in instances of delayed unions (p = 0.10), subluxations (p = 0.55), infection (p = 0.71), or non-unions (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in number of patients with an ideal aMPFA, AI, or MP (p = 0.44, p = 0.19, p = 1.00) at one year post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Immobilization with an abduction pillow is a safe and effective alternative to hip spica casting following hip reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9407031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94070312022-08-26 Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow Vasconcellos, Alexander L. Tagawa, Alex S. Rhodes, Jason T. Silveira, Lori J. Skinner, Austin A. Frumberg, David B. Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: This study aims to compare radiographic outcomes and complication rates of immobilization with an abduction pillow to spica casting for postoperative care after a hip reconstruction with varus derotational proximal femur osteotomy (VDRO) with or without pelvic osteotomy for children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: 233 children (1–18 years old) diagnosed with CP that underwent VDRO with or without pelvic osteotomy were identified, of which 188 patients were immobilized with a spica cast and 45 were immobilized with an abduction pillow, based on surgeon preference. 123 (65%) in the Spica group and 21 (47%) in the pillow group had pelvic osteotomies. Demographic data and complication rates were collected. Radiographic parameters, including anatomic medial proximal femoral angle (aMPFA), acetabular index (AI) and migration percentage (MP), were measured for each patient at the completion of surgery, six weeks post-operatively, and one year post-operatively. RESULTS: There was not a statistically significant difference in BMI (p = 0.285), gender distribution (p = 0.984), or median follow-up time (p = 0.314) between groups. Rates of complications were consistent among groups with no differences in instances of delayed unions (p = 0.10), subluxations (p = 0.55), infection (p = 0.71), or non-unions (p = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in number of patients with an ideal aMPFA, AI, or MP (p = 0.44, p = 0.19, p = 1.00) at one year post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Immobilization with an abduction pillow is a safe and effective alternative to hip spica casting following hip reconstruction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9407031/ /pubmed/36034398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863287 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vasconcellos, Tagawa, Rhodes, Silveira, Skinner and Frumberg. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Vasconcellos, Alexander L.
Tagawa, Alex S.
Rhodes, Jason T.
Silveira, Lori J.
Skinner, Austin A.
Frumberg, David B.
Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow
title Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow
title_full Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow
title_fullStr Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow
title_short Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow
title_sort postoperative immobilization after hip reconstruction in cerebral palsy: no difference between hip spica and abduction pillow
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36034398
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863287
work_keys_str_mv AT vasconcellosalexanderl postoperativeimmobilizationafterhipreconstructionincerebralpalsynodifferencebetweenhipspicaandabductionpillow
AT tagawaalexs postoperativeimmobilizationafterhipreconstructionincerebralpalsynodifferencebetweenhipspicaandabductionpillow
AT rhodesjasont postoperativeimmobilizationafterhipreconstructionincerebralpalsynodifferencebetweenhipspicaandabductionpillow
AT silveiralorij postoperativeimmobilizationafterhipreconstructionincerebralpalsynodifferencebetweenhipspicaandabductionpillow
AT skinneraustina postoperativeimmobilizationafterhipreconstructionincerebralpalsynodifferencebetweenhipspicaandabductionpillow
AT frumbergdavidb postoperativeimmobilizationafterhipreconstructionincerebralpalsynodifferencebetweenhipspicaandabductionpillow