Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review

Background and aims: The applicability of colon capsule endoscopy in daily practice is limited by the accompanying labor-intensive reviewing time and the risk of inter-observer variability. Automated reviewing of colon capsule endoscopy images using artificial intelligence could be timesaving while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moen, Sarah, Vuik, Fanny E. R., Kuipers, Ernst J., Spaander, Manon C. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081994
_version_ 1784774328169005056
author Moen, Sarah
Vuik, Fanny E. R.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
author_facet Moen, Sarah
Vuik, Fanny E. R.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
author_sort Moen, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Background and aims: The applicability of colon capsule endoscopy in daily practice is limited by the accompanying labor-intensive reviewing time and the risk of inter-observer variability. Automated reviewing of colon capsule endoscopy images using artificial intelligence could be timesaving while providing an objective and reproducible outcome. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the available literature on artificial intelligence for reviewing colonic mucosa by colon capsule endoscopy and to assess the necessary action points for its use in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic literature search of literature published up to January 2022 was conducted using Embase, Web of Science, OVID MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies reporting on the use of artificial intelligence to review second-generation colon capsule endoscopy colonic images were included. Results: 1017 studies were evaluated for eligibility, of which nine were included. Two studies reported on computed bowel cleansing assessment, five studies reported on computed polyp or colorectal neoplasia detection and two studies reported on other implications. Overall, the sensitivity of the proposed artificial intelligence models were 86.5–95.5% for bowel cleansing and 47.4–98.1% for the detection of polyps and colorectal neoplasia. Two studies performed per-lesion analysis, in addition to per-frame analysis, which improved the sensitivity of polyp or colorectal neoplasia detection to 81.3–98.1%. By applying a convolutional neural network, the highest sensitivity of 98.1% for polyp detection was found. Conclusion: The use of artificial intelligence for reviewing second-generation colon capsule endoscopy images is promising. The highest sensitivity of 98.1% for polyp detection was achieved by deep learning with a convolutional neural network. Convolutional neural network algorithms should be optimized and tested with more data, possibly requiring the set-up of a large international colon capsule endoscopy database. Finally, the accuracy of the optimized convolutional neural network models need to be confirmed in a prospective setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9407289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94072892022-08-26 Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review Moen, Sarah Vuik, Fanny E. R. Kuipers, Ernst J. Spaander, Manon C. W. Diagnostics (Basel) Systematic Review Background and aims: The applicability of colon capsule endoscopy in daily practice is limited by the accompanying labor-intensive reviewing time and the risk of inter-observer variability. Automated reviewing of colon capsule endoscopy images using artificial intelligence could be timesaving while providing an objective and reproducible outcome. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the available literature on artificial intelligence for reviewing colonic mucosa by colon capsule endoscopy and to assess the necessary action points for its use in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic literature search of literature published up to January 2022 was conducted using Embase, Web of Science, OVID MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL. Studies reporting on the use of artificial intelligence to review second-generation colon capsule endoscopy colonic images were included. Results: 1017 studies were evaluated for eligibility, of which nine were included. Two studies reported on computed bowel cleansing assessment, five studies reported on computed polyp or colorectal neoplasia detection and two studies reported on other implications. Overall, the sensitivity of the proposed artificial intelligence models were 86.5–95.5% for bowel cleansing and 47.4–98.1% for the detection of polyps and colorectal neoplasia. Two studies performed per-lesion analysis, in addition to per-frame analysis, which improved the sensitivity of polyp or colorectal neoplasia detection to 81.3–98.1%. By applying a convolutional neural network, the highest sensitivity of 98.1% for polyp detection was found. Conclusion: The use of artificial intelligence for reviewing second-generation colon capsule endoscopy images is promising. The highest sensitivity of 98.1% for polyp detection was achieved by deep learning with a convolutional neural network. Convolutional neural network algorithms should be optimized and tested with more data, possibly requiring the set-up of a large international colon capsule endoscopy database. Finally, the accuracy of the optimized convolutional neural network models need to be confirmed in a prospective setting. MDPI 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9407289/ /pubmed/36010345 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081994 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Moen, Sarah
Vuik, Fanny E. R.
Kuipers, Ernst J.
Spaander, Manon C. W.
Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
title Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
title_full Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
title_short Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy—A Systematic Review
title_sort artificial intelligence in colon capsule endoscopy—a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36010345
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081994
work_keys_str_mv AT moensarah artificialintelligenceincoloncapsuleendoscopyasystematicreview
AT vuikfannyer artificialintelligenceincoloncapsuleendoscopyasystematicreview
AT kuipersernstj artificialintelligenceincoloncapsuleendoscopyasystematicreview
AT spaandermanoncw artificialintelligenceincoloncapsuleendoscopyasystematicreview