Cargando…

Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)

Tractor rollover is the main cause of both fatal and non-fatal injuries in agriculture. The foldable rollover protective structure (FROPS) can help to prevent these injuries. However, in many cases, the FROPS is left in a folded-down position. Human factor and rear-mounted FROPS technical characteri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vigoroso, Lucia, Caffaro, Federica, Micheletti Cremasco, Margherita, Cavallo, Eugenio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610195
_version_ 1784774549091385344
author Vigoroso, Lucia
Caffaro, Federica
Micheletti Cremasco, Margherita
Cavallo, Eugenio
author_facet Vigoroso, Lucia
Caffaro, Federica
Micheletti Cremasco, Margherita
Cavallo, Eugenio
author_sort Vigoroso, Lucia
collection PubMed
description Tractor rollover is the main cause of both fatal and non-fatal injuries in agriculture. The foldable rollover protective structure (FROPS) can help to prevent these injuries. However, in many cases, the FROPS is left in a folded-down position. Human factor and rear-mounted FROPS technical characteristics influence operators’ behavior in roll-bar handling. To improve the FROPS’s comfortable use, the prototype of an enhanced handling system was developed, and its usability was tested and compared with a conventional FROPS. Usability was assessed with 93 novice tractor users through an ad hoc questionnaire (investigating perceived effort, time demand, the posture adopted and satisfaction) and observations (investigating effectiveness and efficiency) during lowering and raising tasks. For both tasks, the participants perceived significantly less effort, less physical discomfort, a higher level of satisfaction and less time demand while operating the enhanced FROPS. Observations showed that the critical issues that emerged for the conventional FROPS were eliminated by adopting the developed and implemented handling system. The developed handling system showed itself to be usable and effective in making the FROPS easier and safer to be operated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9408200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94082002022-08-26 Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS) Vigoroso, Lucia Caffaro, Federica Micheletti Cremasco, Margherita Cavallo, Eugenio Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Tractor rollover is the main cause of both fatal and non-fatal injuries in agriculture. The foldable rollover protective structure (FROPS) can help to prevent these injuries. However, in many cases, the FROPS is left in a folded-down position. Human factor and rear-mounted FROPS technical characteristics influence operators’ behavior in roll-bar handling. To improve the FROPS’s comfortable use, the prototype of an enhanced handling system was developed, and its usability was tested and compared with a conventional FROPS. Usability was assessed with 93 novice tractor users through an ad hoc questionnaire (investigating perceived effort, time demand, the posture adopted and satisfaction) and observations (investigating effectiveness and efficiency) during lowering and raising tasks. For both tasks, the participants perceived significantly less effort, less physical discomfort, a higher level of satisfaction and less time demand while operating the enhanced FROPS. Observations showed that the critical issues that emerged for the conventional FROPS were eliminated by adopting the developed and implemented handling system. The developed handling system showed itself to be usable and effective in making the FROPS easier and safer to be operated. MDPI 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9408200/ /pubmed/36011826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vigoroso, Lucia
Caffaro, Federica
Micheletti Cremasco, Margherita
Cavallo, Eugenio
Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)
title Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)
title_full Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)
title_fullStr Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)
title_full_unstemmed Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)
title_short Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)
title_sort improving tractor safety: a comparison between the usability of a conventional and enhanced rear-mounted foldable rops (frops)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610195
work_keys_str_mv AT vigorosolucia improvingtractorsafetyacomparisonbetweentheusabilityofaconventionalandenhancedrearmountedfoldableropsfrops
AT caffarofederica improvingtractorsafetyacomparisonbetweentheusabilityofaconventionalandenhancedrearmountedfoldableropsfrops
AT micheletticremascomargherita improvingtractorsafetyacomparisonbetweentheusabilityofaconventionalandenhancedrearmountedfoldableropsfrops
AT cavalloeugenio improvingtractorsafetyacomparisonbetweentheusabilityofaconventionalandenhancedrearmountedfoldableropsfrops