Cargando…
Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
The crouching or prone-on-the-ground observation heights suggested by the My Jump app are not practical in some settings, so users usually hold smartphones in a standing posture. This study aimed to analyze the reliability of My Jump 2 from the standardized and standing positions. Two identical smar...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169854 |
_version_ | 1784774564468752384 |
---|---|
author | Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M. Pueo, Basilio Mossi, Jose M. Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto |
author_facet | Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M. Pueo, Basilio Mossi, Jose M. Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto |
author_sort | Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The crouching or prone-on-the-ground observation heights suggested by the My Jump app are not practical in some settings, so users usually hold smartphones in a standing posture. This study aimed to analyze the reliability of My Jump 2 from the standardized and standing positions. Two identical smartphones recorded 195 countermovement jump executions from 39 active adult athletes at heights 30 and 90 cm, which were randomly assessed by three experienced observers. The between-observer reliability was high for both observation heights separately (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.6 cm; CV~1.3%) with low systematic (0.1 cm) and random (±1.7 cm) errors. The within-observer reliability for the three observers comparing the standardized and standing positions was high (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.7 cm; CV~1.4%), showing errors of 0.3 ± 1.9 cm. Observer 2 was the least accurate out of the three, although reliability remained similar to the levels of agreement found in the literature. The reliability of the mean observations in each height also revealed high reliability (ICC = 0.993; SEM = 0.51 cm; CV = 1.05%, error 0.32 ± 1.4 cm). Therefore, the reliability in the standing position did not change with respect to the standardized position, so it can be regarded as an alternative method to using My Jump 2 with practical added benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9408288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94082882022-08-26 Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M. Pueo, Basilio Mossi, Jose M. Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The crouching or prone-on-the-ground observation heights suggested by the My Jump app are not practical in some settings, so users usually hold smartphones in a standing posture. This study aimed to analyze the reliability of My Jump 2 from the standardized and standing positions. Two identical smartphones recorded 195 countermovement jump executions from 39 active adult athletes at heights 30 and 90 cm, which were randomly assessed by three experienced observers. The between-observer reliability was high for both observation heights separately (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.6 cm; CV~1.3%) with low systematic (0.1 cm) and random (±1.7 cm) errors. The within-observer reliability for the three observers comparing the standardized and standing positions was high (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.7 cm; CV~1.4%), showing errors of 0.3 ± 1.9 cm. Observer 2 was the least accurate out of the three, although reliability remained similar to the levels of agreement found in the literature. The reliability of the mean observations in each height also revealed high reliability (ICC = 0.993; SEM = 0.51 cm; CV = 1.05%, error 0.32 ± 1.4 cm). Therefore, the reliability in the standing position did not change with respect to the standardized position, so it can be regarded as an alternative method to using My Jump 2 with practical added benefits. MDPI 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9408288/ /pubmed/36011491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169854 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M. Pueo, Basilio Mossi, Jose M. Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights |
title | Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights |
title_full | Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights |
title_fullStr | Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights |
title_short | Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights |
title_sort | reliability of my jump 2 derived from crouching and standing observation heights |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jimenezolmedojosem reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights AT pueobasilio reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights AT mossijosem reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights AT villalongaschlamberto reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights |