Cargando…

Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights

The crouching or prone-on-the-ground observation heights suggested by the My Jump app are not practical in some settings, so users usually hold smartphones in a standing posture. This study aimed to analyze the reliability of My Jump 2 from the standardized and standing positions. Two identical smar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M., Pueo, Basilio, Mossi, Jose M., Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169854
_version_ 1784774564468752384
author Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M.
Pueo, Basilio
Mossi, Jose M.
Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto
author_facet Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M.
Pueo, Basilio
Mossi, Jose M.
Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto
author_sort Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M.
collection PubMed
description The crouching or prone-on-the-ground observation heights suggested by the My Jump app are not practical in some settings, so users usually hold smartphones in a standing posture. This study aimed to analyze the reliability of My Jump 2 from the standardized and standing positions. Two identical smartphones recorded 195 countermovement jump executions from 39 active adult athletes at heights 30 and 90 cm, which were randomly assessed by three experienced observers. The between-observer reliability was high for both observation heights separately (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.6 cm; CV~1.3%) with low systematic (0.1 cm) and random (±1.7 cm) errors. The within-observer reliability for the three observers comparing the standardized and standing positions was high (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.7 cm; CV~1.4%), showing errors of 0.3 ± 1.9 cm. Observer 2 was the least accurate out of the three, although reliability remained similar to the levels of agreement found in the literature. The reliability of the mean observations in each height also revealed high reliability (ICC = 0.993; SEM = 0.51 cm; CV = 1.05%, error 0.32 ± 1.4 cm). Therefore, the reliability in the standing position did not change with respect to the standardized position, so it can be regarded as an alternative method to using My Jump 2 with practical added benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9408288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94082882022-08-26 Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M. Pueo, Basilio Mossi, Jose M. Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The crouching or prone-on-the-ground observation heights suggested by the My Jump app are not practical in some settings, so users usually hold smartphones in a standing posture. This study aimed to analyze the reliability of My Jump 2 from the standardized and standing positions. Two identical smartphones recorded 195 countermovement jump executions from 39 active adult athletes at heights 30 and 90 cm, which were randomly assessed by three experienced observers. The between-observer reliability was high for both observation heights separately (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.6 cm; CV~1.3%) with low systematic (0.1 cm) and random (±1.7 cm) errors. The within-observer reliability for the three observers comparing the standardized and standing positions was high (ICC~0.99; SEM~0.7 cm; CV~1.4%), showing errors of 0.3 ± 1.9 cm. Observer 2 was the least accurate out of the three, although reliability remained similar to the levels of agreement found in the literature. The reliability of the mean observations in each height also revealed high reliability (ICC = 0.993; SEM = 0.51 cm; CV = 1.05%, error 0.32 ± 1.4 cm). Therefore, the reliability in the standing position did not change with respect to the standardized position, so it can be regarded as an alternative method to using My Jump 2 with practical added benefits. MDPI 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9408288/ /pubmed/36011491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169854 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jimenez-Olmedo, Jose M.
Pueo, Basilio
Mossi, Jose M.
Villalon-Gasch, Lamberto
Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
title Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
title_full Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
title_fullStr Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
title_short Reliability of My Jump 2 Derived from Crouching and Standing Observation Heights
title_sort reliability of my jump 2 derived from crouching and standing observation heights
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169854
work_keys_str_mv AT jimenezolmedojosem reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights
AT pueobasilio reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights
AT mossijosem reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights
AT villalongaschlamberto reliabilityofmyjump2derivedfromcrouchingandstandingobservationheights