Cargando…

Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?

In recent years, the debate on environmental issues has become a hot topic. Fiscal decentralization is believed to be a crucial driver of environmental sustainability. However, the discussion on the effect of fiscal decentralization (FD) on environmental sustainability has not reached a unanimous co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiao, Guitao, Yang, Dan, Ahmad, Mahmood, Ahmed, Zahoor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610146
_version_ 1784774578291081216
author Qiao, Guitao
Yang, Dan
Ahmad, Mahmood
Ahmed, Zahoor
author_facet Qiao, Guitao
Yang, Dan
Ahmad, Mahmood
Ahmed, Zahoor
author_sort Qiao, Guitao
collection PubMed
description In recent years, the debate on environmental issues has become a hot topic. Fiscal decentralization is believed to be a crucial driver of environmental sustainability. However, the discussion on the effect of fiscal decentralization (FD) on environmental sustainability has not reached a unanimous conclusion. In this study, we inspect the effect of fiscal decentralization, economic development, technological innovation, economic globalization, and energy use on environmental quality in eight Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) member countries. In addition, we analyze the mechanisms through which fiscal decentralization influences the ecological footprint (EF) through the channels of technological innovation and economic growth. Using the STIRPAT framework, this study employed the CS-ARDL method for short-run and long-run analyses that deal with slope heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The empirical results show that fiscal decentralization and technological innovation mitigate ecological footprint, while economic development, energy consumption, and urbanization negatively affect environmental quality. However, economic globalization is not related to the EF in the sample economies. The results further reveal that FD enhances environmental quality through the channel of technological innovation, while it does not affect the EF through the channel of economic growth. Finally, it is recommended to make a reasoned division between the rights and responsibilities of local government and central government in environmental pollution management, and optimize the environmental system. At the same time, policymakers should encourage technological innovation to reduce the adverse impacts of economic development and energy consumption on the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9408344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94083442022-08-26 Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint? Qiao, Guitao Yang, Dan Ahmad, Mahmood Ahmed, Zahoor Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In recent years, the debate on environmental issues has become a hot topic. Fiscal decentralization is believed to be a crucial driver of environmental sustainability. However, the discussion on the effect of fiscal decentralization (FD) on environmental sustainability has not reached a unanimous conclusion. In this study, we inspect the effect of fiscal decentralization, economic development, technological innovation, economic globalization, and energy use on environmental quality in eight Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) member countries. In addition, we analyze the mechanisms through which fiscal decentralization influences the ecological footprint (EF) through the channels of technological innovation and economic growth. Using the STIRPAT framework, this study employed the CS-ARDL method for short-run and long-run analyses that deal with slope heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. The empirical results show that fiscal decentralization and technological innovation mitigate ecological footprint, while economic development, energy consumption, and urbanization negatively affect environmental quality. However, economic globalization is not related to the EF in the sample economies. The results further reveal that FD enhances environmental quality through the channel of technological innovation, while it does not affect the EF through the channel of economic growth. Finally, it is recommended to make a reasoned division between the rights and responsibilities of local government and central government in environmental pollution management, and optimize the environmental system. At the same time, policymakers should encourage technological innovation to reduce the adverse impacts of economic development and energy consumption on the environment. MDPI 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9408344/ /pubmed/36011790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610146 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Qiao, Guitao
Yang, Dan
Ahmad, Mahmood
Ahmed, Zahoor
Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?
title Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?
title_full Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?
title_fullStr Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?
title_full_unstemmed Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?
title_short Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?
title_sort modeling for insights: does fiscal decentralization impede ecological footprint?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610146
work_keys_str_mv AT qiaoguitao modelingforinsightsdoesfiscaldecentralizationimpedeecologicalfootprint
AT yangdan modelingforinsightsdoesfiscaldecentralizationimpedeecologicalfootprint
AT ahmadmahmood modelingforinsightsdoesfiscaldecentralizationimpedeecologicalfootprint
AT ahmedzahoor modelingforinsightsdoesfiscaldecentralizationimpedeecologicalfootprint