Cargando…
One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems
Since their advent in daily clinical practice, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems have been increasingly improved, leading to a high percentage of both adult and pediatric patients with diabetes now using insulin pumps. Different types of CSII systems are currently available, wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610293 |
_version_ | 1784774600070004736 |
---|---|
author | Bombaci, Bruno Passanisi, Stefano Alibrandi, Angela D’Arrigo, Giulia Patroniti, Serena Averna, Simona Salzano, Giuseppina Lombardo, Fortunato |
author_facet | Bombaci, Bruno Passanisi, Stefano Alibrandi, Angela D’Arrigo, Giulia Patroniti, Serena Averna, Simona Salzano, Giuseppina Lombardo, Fortunato |
author_sort | Bombaci, Bruno |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since their advent in daily clinical practice, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems have been increasingly improved, leading to a high percentage of both adult and pediatric patients with diabetes now using insulin pumps. Different types of CSII systems are currently available, which are characterized by different settings and technical features. This longitudinal observational study aims to evaluate real-word glycemic outcomes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using three different CSII devices: hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems, predictive low glucose (PLGS) systems, and non-automated insulin pumps. The secondary objective was to identify clinical variables that may significantly influence the achievement of therapeutic goals in our study cohort. One-hundred-and-one patients on CSII therapy attending our pediatric diabetes center were enrolled. When compared with the non-automated group, patients using HCL systems showed higher levels of time in target glucose range (p = 0.003) and lower glucose variability (p = 0.008). Similarly, we found significantly better glucose metrics in HCL users in comparison to PLGS patients (time in range p = 0.008; coefficient of variation p = 0.009; time above 250 mg/dL p = 0.007). Multiple linear regression models showed that HCL systems (time in range p < 0.001) and high daily percentage of glycemic sensor use (time in range p = 0.031) are predictors for good glycemic control. The introduction and increasing availability of novel technologies for diabetes represent a promising strategy to improve glycemic control and quality of life in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Our real-world data confirm the superiority of HCL systems in terms of improvement of time spent in the target glucose range, prevention of hypoglycemia, and reduction of glycemic variability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9408433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94084332022-08-26 One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems Bombaci, Bruno Passanisi, Stefano Alibrandi, Angela D’Arrigo, Giulia Patroniti, Serena Averna, Simona Salzano, Giuseppina Lombardo, Fortunato Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Since their advent in daily clinical practice, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems have been increasingly improved, leading to a high percentage of both adult and pediatric patients with diabetes now using insulin pumps. Different types of CSII systems are currently available, which are characterized by different settings and technical features. This longitudinal observational study aims to evaluate real-word glycemic outcomes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using three different CSII devices: hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems, predictive low glucose (PLGS) systems, and non-automated insulin pumps. The secondary objective was to identify clinical variables that may significantly influence the achievement of therapeutic goals in our study cohort. One-hundred-and-one patients on CSII therapy attending our pediatric diabetes center were enrolled. When compared with the non-automated group, patients using HCL systems showed higher levels of time in target glucose range (p = 0.003) and lower glucose variability (p = 0.008). Similarly, we found significantly better glucose metrics in HCL users in comparison to PLGS patients (time in range p = 0.008; coefficient of variation p = 0.009; time above 250 mg/dL p = 0.007). Multiple linear regression models showed that HCL systems (time in range p < 0.001) and high daily percentage of glycemic sensor use (time in range p = 0.031) are predictors for good glycemic control. The introduction and increasing availability of novel technologies for diabetes represent a promising strategy to improve glycemic control and quality of life in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Our real-world data confirm the superiority of HCL systems in terms of improvement of time spent in the target glucose range, prevention of hypoglycemia, and reduction of glycemic variability. MDPI 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9408433/ /pubmed/36011925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610293 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bombaci, Bruno Passanisi, Stefano Alibrandi, Angela D’Arrigo, Giulia Patroniti, Serena Averna, Simona Salzano, Giuseppina Lombardo, Fortunato One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems |
title | One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems |
title_full | One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems |
title_fullStr | One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems |
title_short | One-Year Real-World Study on Comparison among Different Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Devices for the Management of Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: The Supremacy of Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems |
title_sort | one-year real-world study on comparison among different continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion devices for the management of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: the supremacy of hybrid closed-loop systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bombacibruno oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT passanisistefano oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT alibrandiangela oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT darrigogiulia oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT patronitiserena oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT avernasimona oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT salzanogiuseppina oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems AT lombardofortunato oneyearrealworldstudyoncomparisonamongdifferentcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusiondevicesforthemanagementofpediatricpatientswithtype1diabetesthesupremacyofhybridclosedloopsystems |