Cargando…
A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting
BackTrack is a multi-component, community-based program designed to build capacity amongst high-risk young people. The aim of this study was to conduct a benefit-cost analysis of BackTrack, which was implemented in Armidale, a rural town in New South Wales, Australia. Costs and benefits were identif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610273 |
_version_ | 1784774615930765312 |
---|---|
author | Deeming, Simon Edmunds, Kim Knight, Alice Searles, Andrew Shakeshaft, Anthony P. Doran, Christopher M. |
author_facet | Deeming, Simon Edmunds, Kim Knight, Alice Searles, Andrew Shakeshaft, Anthony P. Doran, Christopher M. |
author_sort | Deeming, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BackTrack is a multi-component, community-based program designed to build capacity amongst high-risk young people. The aim of this study was to conduct a benefit-cost analysis of BackTrack, which was implemented in Armidale, a rural town in New South Wales, Australia. Costs and benefits were identified, measured and valued in 2016 Australian dollars. Costs were estimated from program financial and administrative records. Benefits were estimated using a pre-post design and conservative economic assumptions. Benefits included education attendance or completion; employment; engagement with health service providers; reduced homelessness; economic productivity; reduced vandalism to local infrastructure; reduced youth crime; reduced engagement with the justice system; and program income generated by participants. The counterfactual baseline was zero educational outcome, based on discussions with BackTrack staff and expert informants. We tested this assumption compared to the assumption that participants had a Year 8 education. There was evidence of significant quantifiable improvements in several outcomes: high school attendance or completion, vocational education attendance or completion, unskilled or vocationally qualified employment and economic productivity. Reduced homelessness, engagement with health services and acquisition of job readiness skills, as well as reduced local infrastructure vandalism and reduced crime were further quantifiable improvements. The net social benefit of BackTrack was estimated at $3,267,967 with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.03, meaning that every dollar invested in BackTrack would return $2.03 in benefits. BackTrack represents a viable funding option for a government interested in addressing the needs of high-risk young people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9408498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94084982022-08-26 A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting Deeming, Simon Edmunds, Kim Knight, Alice Searles, Andrew Shakeshaft, Anthony P. Doran, Christopher M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article BackTrack is a multi-component, community-based program designed to build capacity amongst high-risk young people. The aim of this study was to conduct a benefit-cost analysis of BackTrack, which was implemented in Armidale, a rural town in New South Wales, Australia. Costs and benefits were identified, measured and valued in 2016 Australian dollars. Costs were estimated from program financial and administrative records. Benefits were estimated using a pre-post design and conservative economic assumptions. Benefits included education attendance or completion; employment; engagement with health service providers; reduced homelessness; economic productivity; reduced vandalism to local infrastructure; reduced youth crime; reduced engagement with the justice system; and program income generated by participants. The counterfactual baseline was zero educational outcome, based on discussions with BackTrack staff and expert informants. We tested this assumption compared to the assumption that participants had a Year 8 education. There was evidence of significant quantifiable improvements in several outcomes: high school attendance or completion, vocational education attendance or completion, unskilled or vocationally qualified employment and economic productivity. Reduced homelessness, engagement with health services and acquisition of job readiness skills, as well as reduced local infrastructure vandalism and reduced crime were further quantifiable improvements. The net social benefit of BackTrack was estimated at $3,267,967 with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.03, meaning that every dollar invested in BackTrack would return $2.03 in benefits. BackTrack represents a viable funding option for a government interested in addressing the needs of high-risk young people. MDPI 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9408498/ /pubmed/36011908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610273 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Deeming, Simon Edmunds, Kim Knight, Alice Searles, Andrew Shakeshaft, Anthony P. Doran, Christopher M. A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting |
title | A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting |
title_full | A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting |
title_fullStr | A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting |
title_short | A Benefit-Cost Analysis of BackTrack, a Multi-Component, Community-Based Intervention for High-Risk Young People in a Rural Australian Setting |
title_sort | benefit-cost analysis of backtrack, a multi-component, community-based intervention for high-risk young people in a rural australian setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deemingsimon abenefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT edmundskim abenefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT knightalice abenefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT searlesandrew abenefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT shakeshaftanthonyp abenefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT doranchristopherm abenefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT deemingsimon benefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT edmundskim benefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT knightalice benefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT searlesandrew benefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT shakeshaftanthonyp benefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting AT doranchristopherm benefitcostanalysisofbacktrackamulticomponentcommunitybasedinterventionforhighriskyoungpeopleinaruralaustraliansetting |