Cargando…

Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis that needs better treatment modalities. Moreover, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers to predict the response and outcome of current or newly designed therapies. While several molecular markers have been proposed as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sareen, Heena, Ma, Yafeng, Becker, Therese M., Roberts, Tara L., de Souza, Paul, Powter, Branka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168835
_version_ 1784774626406039552
author Sareen, Heena
Ma, Yafeng
Becker, Therese M.
Roberts, Tara L.
de Souza, Paul
Powter, Branka
author_facet Sareen, Heena
Ma, Yafeng
Becker, Therese M.
Roberts, Tara L.
de Souza, Paul
Powter, Branka
author_sort Sareen, Heena
collection PubMed
description Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis that needs better treatment modalities. Moreover, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers to predict the response and outcome of current or newly designed therapies. While several molecular markers have been proposed as potential biomarkers for GBM, their uptake into clinical settings is slow and impeded by marker heterogeneity. Detailed assessment of prognostic and predictive value for biomarkers in well-defined clinical trial settings, if available, is scattered throughout the literature. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers in GBM patients. Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to retrieve publications from 3 databases (Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase) from January 2010 to December 2021, using specific terms. The combined hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to evaluate the association of biomarkers with overall survival (OS) in GBM patients. Results: Twenty-six out of 1831 screened articles were included in this review. Nineteen articles were included in the meta-analyses, and 7 articles were quantitatively summarised. Fourteen studies with 1231 GBM patients showed a significant association of MGMT methylation with better OS with the pooled HR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.32–2.09, p < 0.0001, random effect). Five studies including 541 GBM patients analysed for the prognostic significance of IDH1 mutation showed significantly better OS in patients with IDH1 mutation with a pooled HR of 2.37 (95% CI 1.81–3.12; p < 0.00001]. Meta-analysis performed on 5 studies including 575 GBM patients presenting with either amplification or high expression of EGFR gene did not reveal any prognostic significance with a pooled HR of 1.31 (95% CI 0.96–1.79; p = 0.08). Conclusions: MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutation are significantly associated with better OS in GBM patients. No significant associations were found between EGFR amplification or overexpression with OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9408540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94085402022-08-26 Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sareen, Heena Ma, Yafeng Becker, Therese M. Roberts, Tara L. de Souza, Paul Powter, Branka Int J Mol Sci Review Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis that needs better treatment modalities. Moreover, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers to predict the response and outcome of current or newly designed therapies. While several molecular markers have been proposed as potential biomarkers for GBM, their uptake into clinical settings is slow and impeded by marker heterogeneity. Detailed assessment of prognostic and predictive value for biomarkers in well-defined clinical trial settings, if available, is scattered throughout the literature. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers in GBM patients. Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to retrieve publications from 3 databases (Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase) from January 2010 to December 2021, using specific terms. The combined hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to evaluate the association of biomarkers with overall survival (OS) in GBM patients. Results: Twenty-six out of 1831 screened articles were included in this review. Nineteen articles were included in the meta-analyses, and 7 articles were quantitatively summarised. Fourteen studies with 1231 GBM patients showed a significant association of MGMT methylation with better OS with the pooled HR of 1.66 (95% CI 1.32–2.09, p < 0.0001, random effect). Five studies including 541 GBM patients analysed for the prognostic significance of IDH1 mutation showed significantly better OS in patients with IDH1 mutation with a pooled HR of 2.37 (95% CI 1.81–3.12; p < 0.00001]. Meta-analysis performed on 5 studies including 575 GBM patients presenting with either amplification or high expression of EGFR gene did not reveal any prognostic significance with a pooled HR of 1.31 (95% CI 0.96–1.79; p = 0.08). Conclusions: MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutation are significantly associated with better OS in GBM patients. No significant associations were found between EGFR amplification or overexpression with OS. MDPI 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9408540/ /pubmed/36012105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168835 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Sareen, Heena
Ma, Yafeng
Becker, Therese M.
Roberts, Tara L.
de Souza, Paul
Powter, Branka
Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort molecular biomarkers in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168835
work_keys_str_mv AT sareenheena molecularbiomarkersinglioblastomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mayafeng molecularbiomarkersinglioblastomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beckertheresem molecularbiomarkersinglioblastomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertstaral molecularbiomarkersinglioblastomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT desouzapaul molecularbiomarkersinglioblastomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT powterbranka molecularbiomarkersinglioblastomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis