Cargando…
Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma
The G105G SNP (rs11554137) in the IDH1 gene is observed in about 10–15% of patients with a diffuse glioma. Data regarding its impact on gliomas are poor and partially conflicting, possibly due to the evolving classification of CNS tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the G105G SNP progno...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13081439 |
_version_ | 1784774640498900992 |
---|---|
author | Saaid, Ayoub Monticelli, Matteo Ricci, Alessia Andrea Orlando, Giulia Botta, Cristina Zeppa, Pietro Bianconi, Andrea Osella-Abate, Simona Bruno, Francesco Pellerino, Alessia Rudà, Roberta Cassoni, Paola Garbossa, Diego Cofano, Fabio Bertero, Luca |
author_facet | Saaid, Ayoub Monticelli, Matteo Ricci, Alessia Andrea Orlando, Giulia Botta, Cristina Zeppa, Pietro Bianconi, Andrea Osella-Abate, Simona Bruno, Francesco Pellerino, Alessia Rudà, Roberta Cassoni, Paola Garbossa, Diego Cofano, Fabio Bertero, Luca |
author_sort | Saaid, Ayoub |
collection | PubMed |
description | The G105G SNP (rs11554137) in the IDH1 gene is observed in about 10–15% of patients with a diffuse glioma. Data regarding its impact on gliomas are poor and partially conflicting, possibly due to the evolving classification of CNS tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the G105G SNP prognostic significance in a homogenous cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, in agreement with the 2021 WHO classification. The study analyzed 211 patients by collecting several clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics, including the age, lesion localization, number of involved lobes, type of surgical treatment, disease outcome and MGMT promoter methylation status. PFS and DSS curves were plotted according to the Kaplan–Meier method and statistical analyses were performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. A total of 32 patients out of 211 (15.2%) were found to be G105G SNP carriers. No significant impact of the IDH1 G105G SNP on patients’ outcomes was observed in terms of PFS and DSS, while MGMT promoter methylation and gross total resection resulted as key prognostic factors in our cohort as expected. No prognostic impact of the IDH1 G105G SNP was detected in this strict cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Analysis of larger cohorts is warranted to address the sample size limitations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9408597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94085972022-08-26 Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma Saaid, Ayoub Monticelli, Matteo Ricci, Alessia Andrea Orlando, Giulia Botta, Cristina Zeppa, Pietro Bianconi, Andrea Osella-Abate, Simona Bruno, Francesco Pellerino, Alessia Rudà, Roberta Cassoni, Paola Garbossa, Diego Cofano, Fabio Bertero, Luca Genes (Basel) Article The G105G SNP (rs11554137) in the IDH1 gene is observed in about 10–15% of patients with a diffuse glioma. Data regarding its impact on gliomas are poor and partially conflicting, possibly due to the evolving classification of CNS tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the G105G SNP prognostic significance in a homogenous cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, in agreement with the 2021 WHO classification. The study analyzed 211 patients by collecting several clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics, including the age, lesion localization, number of involved lobes, type of surgical treatment, disease outcome and MGMT promoter methylation status. PFS and DSS curves were plotted according to the Kaplan–Meier method and statistical analyses were performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. A total of 32 patients out of 211 (15.2%) were found to be G105G SNP carriers. No significant impact of the IDH1 G105G SNP on patients’ outcomes was observed in terms of PFS and DSS, while MGMT promoter methylation and gross total resection resulted as key prognostic factors in our cohort as expected. No prognostic impact of the IDH1 G105G SNP was detected in this strict cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Analysis of larger cohorts is warranted to address the sample size limitations. MDPI 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9408597/ /pubmed/36011350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13081439 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Saaid, Ayoub Monticelli, Matteo Ricci, Alessia Andrea Orlando, Giulia Botta, Cristina Zeppa, Pietro Bianconi, Andrea Osella-Abate, Simona Bruno, Francesco Pellerino, Alessia Rudà, Roberta Cassoni, Paola Garbossa, Diego Cofano, Fabio Bertero, Luca Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma |
title | Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma |
title_full | Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma |
title_short | Prognostic Analysis of the IDH1 G105G (rs11554137) SNP in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma |
title_sort | prognostic analysis of the idh1 g105g (rs11554137) snp in idh-wildtype glioblastoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011350 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13081439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saaidayoub prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT monticellimatteo prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT riccialessiaandrea prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT orlandogiulia prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT bottacristina prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT zeppapietro prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT bianconiandrea prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT osellaabatesimona prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT brunofrancesco prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT pellerinoalessia prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT rudaroberta prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT cassonipaola prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT garbossadiego prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT cofanofabio prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma AT berteroluca prognosticanalysisoftheidh1g105grs11554137snpinidhwildtypeglioblastoma |