Cargando…
Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey
(1) Background: Orthodontists have an important role in cleft care. Over the two decades since the Eurocleft studies, a significant improvement in healthcare systems has been achieved but there has been no critical assessment regarding the establishment of proposed standard protocols. This study aim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081555 |
_version_ | 1784774648396775424 |
---|---|
author | Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco |
author_facet | Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco |
author_sort | Francisco, Inês |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: Orthodontists have an important role in cleft care. Over the two decades since the Eurocleft studies, a significant improvement in healthcare systems has been achieved but there has been no critical assessment regarding the establishment of proposed standard protocols. This study aimed to describe the current provider characteristics, orthodontic appliances, services offered, orthodontic complications, and cost analysis of cleft treatment in Europe. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional 22-question online survey, accessible from January 2021 to July 2021, was sent to 214 practitioners, pertaining to provider characteristics, orthodontic appliances, services offered, orthodontic complications, and cost analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each question. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between categorical variables. (3) Results: A total of 79 responses from 23 European countries completed the survey (response rate = 37%), with 69 surveys being assessed after the exclusion of incomplete surveys. Rapid maxillary expansion was the preferred expansion protocol (45%). Distraction osteogenesis was the most reported alternative treatment to secondary bone grafts (19%), with private practitioners being less likely to perform these treatments (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.001). Orthodontic services offered were, however, rather similar in the various locations of provision (hospital and/or university, private). Compromised oral hygiene (77%) was the most reported orthodontic complication. The National Health Services support the majority of cleft orthodontic care (67%) in Europe. (4) Conclusion: An apparent improvement in orthodontic healthcare provision has been achieved within Europe in the last two decades, but there are several discrepancies, namely regarding treatment timing and the appliances offered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9408629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94086292022-08-26 Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco Healthcare (Basel) Article (1) Background: Orthodontists have an important role in cleft care. Over the two decades since the Eurocleft studies, a significant improvement in healthcare systems has been achieved but there has been no critical assessment regarding the establishment of proposed standard protocols. This study aimed to describe the current provider characteristics, orthodontic appliances, services offered, orthodontic complications, and cost analysis of cleft treatment in Europe. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional 22-question online survey, accessible from January 2021 to July 2021, was sent to 214 practitioners, pertaining to provider characteristics, orthodontic appliances, services offered, orthodontic complications, and cost analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each question. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between categorical variables. (3) Results: A total of 79 responses from 23 European countries completed the survey (response rate = 37%), with 69 surveys being assessed after the exclusion of incomplete surveys. Rapid maxillary expansion was the preferred expansion protocol (45%). Distraction osteogenesis was the most reported alternative treatment to secondary bone grafts (19%), with private practitioners being less likely to perform these treatments (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.001). Orthodontic services offered were, however, rather similar in the various locations of provision (hospital and/or university, private). Compromised oral hygiene (77%) was the most reported orthodontic complication. The National Health Services support the majority of cleft orthodontic care (67%) in Europe. (4) Conclusion: An apparent improvement in orthodontic healthcare provision has been achieved within Europe in the last two decades, but there are several discrepancies, namely regarding treatment timing and the appliances offered. MDPI 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9408629/ /pubmed/36011212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081555 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Francisco, Inês Antonarakis, Gregory S. Caramelo, Francisco Fernandes, Maria Helena Vale, Francisco Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title | Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full | Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_fullStr | Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_short | Cleft Orthodontic Care in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey |
title_sort | cleft orthodontic care in europe: a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9408629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36011212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franciscoines cleftorthodonticcareineuropeacrosssectionalsurvey AT antonarakisgregorys cleftorthodonticcareineuropeacrosssectionalsurvey AT caramelofrancisco cleftorthodonticcareineuropeacrosssectionalsurvey AT fernandesmariahelena cleftorthodonticcareineuropeacrosssectionalsurvey AT valefrancisco cleftorthodonticcareineuropeacrosssectionalsurvey |