Cargando…
Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model
Paired stimulation of the brain and spinal cord can remodel the central nervous tissue circuitry in an animal model to induce motor neuroplasticity. The effects of simultaneous stimulation vary according to the extent and severity of spinal cord injury. Therefore, our study aimed to determine the si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169447 |
_version_ | 1784774761328410624 |
---|---|
author | Adeel, Muhammad Lin, Bor-Shing Chen, Hung-Chou Lai, Chien-Hung Liou, Jian-Chiun Wu, Chun-Wei Chan, Wing P. Peng, Chih-Wei |
author_facet | Adeel, Muhammad Lin, Bor-Shing Chen, Hung-Chou Lai, Chien-Hung Liou, Jian-Chiun Wu, Chun-Wei Chan, Wing P. Peng, Chih-Wei |
author_sort | Adeel, Muhammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Paired stimulation of the brain and spinal cord can remodel the central nervous tissue circuitry in an animal model to induce motor neuroplasticity. The effects of simultaneous stimulation vary according to the extent and severity of spinal cord injury. Therefore, our study aimed to determine the significant effects on an incomplete SCI rat brain and spinal cord through 3 min and 20 min stimulations after 4 weeks of intervention. Thirty-three Sprague Dawley rats were classified into six groups: (1) normal, (2) sham, (3) iTBS/tsDCS, (4) iTBS/ts-iTBS, (5) rTMS/tsDCS, and (6) rTMS/ts-iTBS. Paired stimulation of the brain cortex and spinal cord thoracic (T10) level was applied simultaneously for 3–20 min. The motor evoked potential (MEP) and Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scores were recorded after every week of intervention for four weeks along with wheel training for 20 min. Three-minute stimulation with the iTBS/tsDCS intervention induced a significant (p < 0.050 *) increase in MEP after week 2 and week 4 treatments, while 3 min iTBS/ts-iTBS significantly improved MEP (p < 0.050 *) only after the week 3 intervention. The 20 min rTMS/ts-iTBS intervention showed a significant change only in post_5 min after week 4. The BBB score also changed significantly in all groups except for the 20 min rTMS/tsDCS intervention. iTBS/tsDCS and rTMS/ts-iTBS interventions induce neuroplasticity in an incomplete SCI animal model by significantly changing electrophysiological (MEP) and locomotion (BBB) outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9409074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94090742022-08-26 Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model Adeel, Muhammad Lin, Bor-Shing Chen, Hung-Chou Lai, Chien-Hung Liou, Jian-Chiun Wu, Chun-Wei Chan, Wing P. Peng, Chih-Wei Int J Mol Sci Article Paired stimulation of the brain and spinal cord can remodel the central nervous tissue circuitry in an animal model to induce motor neuroplasticity. The effects of simultaneous stimulation vary according to the extent and severity of spinal cord injury. Therefore, our study aimed to determine the significant effects on an incomplete SCI rat brain and spinal cord through 3 min and 20 min stimulations after 4 weeks of intervention. Thirty-three Sprague Dawley rats were classified into six groups: (1) normal, (2) sham, (3) iTBS/tsDCS, (4) iTBS/ts-iTBS, (5) rTMS/tsDCS, and (6) rTMS/ts-iTBS. Paired stimulation of the brain cortex and spinal cord thoracic (T10) level was applied simultaneously for 3–20 min. The motor evoked potential (MEP) and Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scores were recorded after every week of intervention for four weeks along with wheel training for 20 min. Three-minute stimulation with the iTBS/tsDCS intervention induced a significant (p < 0.050 *) increase in MEP after week 2 and week 4 treatments, while 3 min iTBS/ts-iTBS significantly improved MEP (p < 0.050 *) only after the week 3 intervention. The 20 min rTMS/ts-iTBS intervention showed a significant change only in post_5 min after week 4. The BBB score also changed significantly in all groups except for the 20 min rTMS/tsDCS intervention. iTBS/tsDCS and rTMS/ts-iTBS interventions induce neuroplasticity in an incomplete SCI animal model by significantly changing electrophysiological (MEP) and locomotion (BBB) outcomes. MDPI 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9409074/ /pubmed/36012710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169447 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Adeel, Muhammad Lin, Bor-Shing Chen, Hung-Chou Lai, Chien-Hung Liou, Jian-Chiun Wu, Chun-Wei Chan, Wing P. Peng, Chih-Wei Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model |
title | Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model |
title_full | Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model |
title_fullStr | Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model |
title_short | Motor Neuroplastic Effects of a Novel Paired Stimulation Technology in an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Animal Model |
title_sort | motor neuroplastic effects of a novel paired stimulation technology in an incomplete spinal cord injury animal model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adeelmuhammad motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT linborshing motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT chenhungchou motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT laichienhung motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT lioujianchiun motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT wuchunwei motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT chanwingp motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel AT pengchihwei motorneuroplasticeffectsofanovelpairedstimulationtechnologyinanincompletespinalcordinjuryanimalmodel |