Cargando…
Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
Acoustical biophysical therapies, including ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves, have been shown to harbor both a destructive and regenerative potential depending on physical treatment parameters. Despite the clinical relevance of fungal biofilms, little work exits comparing the effica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169226 |
_version_ | 1784774781877354496 |
---|---|
author | Slezak, Cyrill Anderson, Karaleen Hillock, Tyson Miller, Mariel Dungel, Peter Kopp, Olga Sterflinger, Katja Slezak, Paul |
author_facet | Slezak, Cyrill Anderson, Karaleen Hillock, Tyson Miller, Mariel Dungel, Peter Kopp, Olga Sterflinger, Katja Slezak, Paul |
author_sort | Slezak, Cyrill |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acoustical biophysical therapies, including ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves, have been shown to harbor both a destructive and regenerative potential depending on physical treatment parameters. Despite the clinical relevance of fungal biofilms, little work exits comparing the efficacy of these modalities on the destruction of fungal biofilms. This study evaluates the impact of acoustical low-frequency ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves on the viability and proliferation of in vitro Rhizopus oryzae biofilm under Amphotericin B induced apoptosis. In addition, the impact of a fibrin substrate in comparison with a traditional polystyrene well-plate one is explored. We found consistent, mechanically promoted increased Amphotericin B efficacy when treating the biofilm in conjunction with low frequency ultrasound and radial pressure waves. In contrast, shockwave induced effects of mechanotransduction results in a stronger resilience of the biofilm, which was evident by a marked increase in cellular viability, and was not observed in the other types of acoustical pressure waves. Our findings suggest that fungal biofilms not only provide another model for mechanistical investigations of the regenerative properties of shockwave therapies, but warrant future investigations into the clinical viability of the therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9409157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94091572022-08-26 Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment Slezak, Cyrill Anderson, Karaleen Hillock, Tyson Miller, Mariel Dungel, Peter Kopp, Olga Sterflinger, Katja Slezak, Paul Int J Mol Sci Article Acoustical biophysical therapies, including ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves, have been shown to harbor both a destructive and regenerative potential depending on physical treatment parameters. Despite the clinical relevance of fungal biofilms, little work exits comparing the efficacy of these modalities on the destruction of fungal biofilms. This study evaluates the impact of acoustical low-frequency ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves on the viability and proliferation of in vitro Rhizopus oryzae biofilm under Amphotericin B induced apoptosis. In addition, the impact of a fibrin substrate in comparison with a traditional polystyrene well-plate one is explored. We found consistent, mechanically promoted increased Amphotericin B efficacy when treating the biofilm in conjunction with low frequency ultrasound and radial pressure waves. In contrast, shockwave induced effects of mechanotransduction results in a stronger resilience of the biofilm, which was evident by a marked increase in cellular viability, and was not observed in the other types of acoustical pressure waves. Our findings suggest that fungal biofilms not only provide another model for mechanistical investigations of the regenerative properties of shockwave therapies, but warrant future investigations into the clinical viability of the therapy. MDPI 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9409157/ /pubmed/36012494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169226 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Slezak, Cyrill Anderson, Karaleen Hillock, Tyson Miller, Mariel Dungel, Peter Kopp, Olga Sterflinger, Katja Slezak, Paul Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment |
title | Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment |
title_full | Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment |
title_fullStr | Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment |
title_short | Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment |
title_sort | shockwaves increase in vitro resilience of rhizopus oryzae biofilm under amphotericin b treatment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slezakcyrill shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT andersonkaraleen shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT hillocktyson shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT millermariel shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT dungelpeter shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT koppolga shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT sterflingerkatja shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment AT slezakpaul shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment |