Cargando…

Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment

Acoustical biophysical therapies, including ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves, have been shown to harbor both a destructive and regenerative potential depending on physical treatment parameters. Despite the clinical relevance of fungal biofilms, little work exits comparing the effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slezak, Cyrill, Anderson, Karaleen, Hillock, Tyson, Miller, Mariel, Dungel, Peter, Kopp, Olga, Sterflinger, Katja, Slezak, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169226
_version_ 1784774781877354496
author Slezak, Cyrill
Anderson, Karaleen
Hillock, Tyson
Miller, Mariel
Dungel, Peter
Kopp, Olga
Sterflinger, Katja
Slezak, Paul
author_facet Slezak, Cyrill
Anderson, Karaleen
Hillock, Tyson
Miller, Mariel
Dungel, Peter
Kopp, Olga
Sterflinger, Katja
Slezak, Paul
author_sort Slezak, Cyrill
collection PubMed
description Acoustical biophysical therapies, including ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves, have been shown to harbor both a destructive and regenerative potential depending on physical treatment parameters. Despite the clinical relevance of fungal biofilms, little work exits comparing the efficacy of these modalities on the destruction of fungal biofilms. This study evaluates the impact of acoustical low-frequency ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves on the viability and proliferation of in vitro Rhizopus oryzae biofilm under Amphotericin B induced apoptosis. In addition, the impact of a fibrin substrate in comparison with a traditional polystyrene well-plate one is explored. We found consistent, mechanically promoted increased Amphotericin B efficacy when treating the biofilm in conjunction with low frequency ultrasound and radial pressure waves. In contrast, shockwave induced effects of mechanotransduction results in a stronger resilience of the biofilm, which was evident by a marked increase in cellular viability, and was not observed in the other types of acoustical pressure waves. Our findings suggest that fungal biofilms not only provide another model for mechanistical investigations of the regenerative properties of shockwave therapies, but warrant future investigations into the clinical viability of the therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9409157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94091572022-08-26 Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment Slezak, Cyrill Anderson, Karaleen Hillock, Tyson Miller, Mariel Dungel, Peter Kopp, Olga Sterflinger, Katja Slezak, Paul Int J Mol Sci Article Acoustical biophysical therapies, including ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves, have been shown to harbor both a destructive and regenerative potential depending on physical treatment parameters. Despite the clinical relevance of fungal biofilms, little work exits comparing the efficacy of these modalities on the destruction of fungal biofilms. This study evaluates the impact of acoustical low-frequency ultrasound, radial pressure waves, and shockwaves on the viability and proliferation of in vitro Rhizopus oryzae biofilm under Amphotericin B induced apoptosis. In addition, the impact of a fibrin substrate in comparison with a traditional polystyrene well-plate one is explored. We found consistent, mechanically promoted increased Amphotericin B efficacy when treating the biofilm in conjunction with low frequency ultrasound and radial pressure waves. In contrast, shockwave induced effects of mechanotransduction results in a stronger resilience of the biofilm, which was evident by a marked increase in cellular viability, and was not observed in the other types of acoustical pressure waves. Our findings suggest that fungal biofilms not only provide another model for mechanistical investigations of the regenerative properties of shockwave therapies, but warrant future investigations into the clinical viability of the therapy. MDPI 2022-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9409157/ /pubmed/36012494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169226 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Slezak, Cyrill
Anderson, Karaleen
Hillock, Tyson
Miller, Mariel
Dungel, Peter
Kopp, Olga
Sterflinger, Katja
Slezak, Paul
Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
title Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
title_full Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
title_fullStr Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
title_short Shockwaves Increase In Vitro Resilience of Rhizopus oryzae Biofilm under Amphotericin B Treatment
title_sort shockwaves increase in vitro resilience of rhizopus oryzae biofilm under amphotericin b treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9409157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36012494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169226
work_keys_str_mv AT slezakcyrill shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT andersonkaraleen shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT hillocktyson shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT millermariel shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT dungelpeter shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT koppolga shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT sterflingerkatja shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment
AT slezakpaul shockwavesincreaseinvitroresilienceofrhizopusoryzaebiofilmunderamphotericinbtreatment